Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1908 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bennett v. Bennett
BENNETT v. BENNETT. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE ' TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 98. Argued January 9, 10, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Under pars. 3983, 3984, §§ 105, 106, Code of Civil Procedure of Oklahoma Territory
Jetton v. University of the South
JETTON, REVENUE AGENT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE, v. UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE.MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 488. Argued January 28, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Although all
Ughbanks v. Armstrong
UGHBANKS v. ARMSTRONG, WARDEN OF THE MICHIGAN STATE PRISON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 435. Submitted January 20, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. The indeterminate sentence law of Michigan of 1903, as. constru
Richard v. City of Mobile
RICHARD v. CITY OF MOBILE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 112. Argued January 17, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Decided on the authority of Phillips v. City of Mobile, ante, p
Phillips v. City of Mobile
PHILLIPS v. CITY OF MOBILE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ALABAMA. No. 113. Argued January 17, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. An ordinance imposing a license on persons selling beer by the barrel is an exercise of the police
Great Northern Railway Co. v. United States
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT: ' ^ No. 491. Argued January 7, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. The provisions of § 13, Rev. Stat., that the repe
Calvo v. De Gutierrez
CALVO v. De GUTIERREZ. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 80. Argued December 17, 1907. Decided February 24, 1908. An agreement made between the owners of a half interest in property in Manilla, who were ultimate h
Notley v. Brown
NOTLEY v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE» TERRITORY OP HAWAII. No. 68. Argued January 24, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Harrison v. Magoon,205 U. S.'501, followed to effect that the act of March 3, 1905; c. 1465, 33 Stat. 1035,
Bien v. Robinson
BIEN v. ROBINSON, RECEIVER OF HAIGHT & FREESE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR "THE SOUTHERN; DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 135. Submitted January 27, 1908. Decided February 24. 1908. Where the jurisdiction of the Ci
Muller v. Oregon
MULLER, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE STATE OF OREGON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE -STATE OF OREGON. No. 107. Argued January 15, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. The peculiar value of a written constitution is that it places, in unchangi
Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
HENNINGSEN v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY COMPANY OF BALTIMORE, MARYLAND. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH ' CIRCUIT. • No. 78. Argued December 16, 17, 1907. Decided February 24, 1908. Although diversity of cit
United States v. Bitty
UNITED STATES v. BITTY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK^. No. 503. Submitted January 27, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. It is within the power of Congress to determine the regulations
Bassing v. Cady
BASSING v. CADY. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT O.F THE STATE OF RHODE ISLAND. No. 426. Argued January 8, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. On appeal or writ of error to this -'court, - papers or documents used in the court below cannot in .str
Cosmopolitan Club v. Virginia
COSMOPOLITAN CLUB v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. ' No. 130. Argued January 23, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. The charter of a private corporation may be forfeited or annulled
Atlantic Trust Co. v. Chapman
ATLANTIC TRUST COMPANY v. CHAPMAN, RECEIVER OF THE WOODBRIDGE CANAL AND IRRIGATION COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 109. Argued January 15, 16, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. ■A receiver, as
Dick v. United States
DICK v. UNITED STATES. RROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO. No. 62. Submitted December 3, 1907. Decided February 24, 1908. 'While a, State, upon, its admission to the Union, is on an equal footing with
United States v. Larkin
UNITED STATES v. LARKIN, INTERVENOR AND CLAIMANT. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 356. Argued January 7, 8, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Where the Circuit Court of Appeals has alre
Armstrong v. Fernandez
ARMSTRONG, AS LIQUIDATOR OF BOYSEN & COMPANY, v. FERNANDEZ. APPEAL FROM 'THE. DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 114. Submitted January 17, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. The power of the bankruptcy court over amendme
The Troy
THE TROY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 232. Submitted December 20, 1907. Decided February 24, 1908. Cleveland Terminal Co. v. Steamship Co., ante, p. 316, followed to effect
Cleveland Terminal & Valley Railroad Co. v. Cleveland Steamship Co.
CLEVELAND TERMINAL AND VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. CLEVELAND STEAMSHIP COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 84. Argued December 17, 18, 1907. Decided February 24, 1908. The admir
Lewis v. Herrera
LEWIS v. HERRERA, RECEIVER OF THE INTERNATIONAL BANK IN NOGALES. APPEAL FROM. THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 79. Submitted December 13, 1907. Decided February 24, 1908. The construction of the statute of a Territory by t
Loewe v. Lawlor
LOEWE v. LAWLOR. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE . SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 389. Argued December 4, 5, 1907. Decided February 3, 1908. After the Circuit Court of Appeals has certified questions to this court and .this court ha
Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co.
DONNELL v. HERRING-HALL-MARVIN SAFE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 106. Argued January 14, 15, 1908. Decided February 3, 1908. A stockholder, even though also an officer, of a corporation be
United Dictionary Co. v. G. & C. Merriam Co.
UNITED DICTIONARY COMPANY v. G. & C. MERRIAM COMPANY. J APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT} OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 129. Argued January 23, 1908. Decided February 3, 1908. The requirement of the Copyright Act of'June 18, 1874, c.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.