Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1908 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Rickey Land & Cattle Co. v. Miller & Lux
No. 646. No. 653. Rickey Land & Cattle Company, Petitioner, v. Miller and Lux; and Rickey Land & Cattle Company, Petitioner, v. Henry Wood et al. March 9, 1908. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for petitioner. Mr. W. B. Treadwell for respondent in
United States v. Thayer
UNITED STATES v. THAYER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 390. Argued February 25, 1908. Decided March 9, 1908. A man may sometimes be punished in person where he has brought consequen
Wabash Railroad v. Adelbert College of the Western Reserve University
WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY v. ADELBERT COLLEGE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 40. Petition for rehearing and motion to modify judgment. Submitted January 31, 1908. Decided March 9, 1908.
Sixto v. Sarria
No. 186. Adolfo Sixto, Plaintiff in Error, v. Laureano Sarria. March 2, 1908. Mr. N. B. K. Pettingill for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney for defendant in error.
Seeley v. Seeley
No. 612. Franklin H. Seeley, Petitioner, v. Blanche Lowe Seeley. March 2, 1908. Mr. Barry Mohun and Mr. H. Prescott Gatley for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Cook v. Foley
No. 590. Wallace P. Cook et al., Petitioners, v. Timothy Foley et al. March 2, 1908. Mr. George P. Wilson for petitioners. Mr. Harris Richardson for respondents.
United States Life Insurance v. Spinks
No. 445. The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York, Plaintiff in Error, v. Harry Spinks. Motion to dismiss submitted-February 24, 1908. Decided March 2, 1908. Mr. William Marshall Bullitt, Mr. Charles E. Patterson and
Battle v. United States
BATTLE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT- OP GEORGIA. No. 438. Submitted January 28, 1908. Decided March 2, 1908. Under Article I, § 8, cl. 17, of the Federal Constitution, Congress
Venner v. Great Northern Railway Co.
VENNER v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 485. Submitted January 20, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Where the question of jurisdiction is certif
Dun v. Lumbermen's Credit Ass'n
DUN v. LUMBERMEN’S CREDIT ASSOCIATION. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 138. Argued January 31, 1908, Decided February 24, 1908. Findings of fact in a suit in equity made by both the Circuit Court and th
White-Smith Music Publishing Co. v. Apollo Co.
WHITE-SMITH MUSIC PUBLISHING COMPANY v. APOLLO COMPANY. APPEALS PROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 110, 111. Argued January 16, 17, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. While this court is not bound
Smith v. United States
No. 597. Charles M. Smith, Sr., et al., Petitioners, v. The United States. February 24, 1908. Petition for a writ of- certiorari- to the United States Circuit .Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied. Mr. A. S. Worthington and Mr. B.
Paolucci v. United States
No. 578. Joseph Paolucci, Petitioner, v. The United States. February 24, 1908. Petition for a .writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia denied. Mr. Wilton J. Lambert fpr petitioner. The Attorney General and The
United Land Ass'n v. Abrahams
Nos. 5 and 4. United Land Association et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lewis Abrahams et al. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. Argued January 29, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Mr. Charles A. Keigwin and Mr. John G.
Hairston v. Danville & Western Railway Co.
HAIRSTON v. DANVILLE AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 6. Argued January 10, 13, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. "Where the condemnation of land has been held by the state cour
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Minnesota ex rel. City of Duluth
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA ex rel. THE CITY OF DULUTH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 92. Argued December 20, 23, 1907. Decided February 24, 1908. In cases arising under the contract cl
Disconto Gesellschaft v. Umbreit
DISCONTO GESELLSCHAFT v. UMBREIT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY (BRANCH NO. 1), STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 63. Argued December 10, 11, 1907 Decided February 24, 1908. It is too late to raise the Federal question on motion for
United States v. Sisseton & Wahpeton Bands
UNITED STATES v. SISSETON AND WAHPETON BANDS OF SIOUX INDIANS. SISSETON AND WAHPETON BANDS OF SIOUX INDIANS v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT1 OF CLAIMS. Nos. 338, 339. Argued January 7, 8, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. While ther
Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.
HERRING-HALL-MARVIN SAFE COMPANY v. HALL’S SAFE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE'SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 136. Argued January 30, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. Donnell v. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co., ante, pi 267, f
First National Bank v. Albright
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALBUQUERQUE v. ALBRIGHT. • APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY 05 NEW MEXICO. No. 123. Argued January 22, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. A county treasurer accepting that part-of the tax which a party ass
Rankin v. City National Bank
RANKIN, RECEIVER OF THE CAPITOL NATIONAL BANK OF GUTHRIE, OKLAHOMA, v. CITY NATIONAL BANK OF KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI. ■ ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued November 12, 13, 1907. Decided February 24, 1
Drumm-Flato Commission Co. v. Edmisson
DRUMM-FLATO COMMISSION COMPANY v. EDMISSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. No. 139. Submitted January 27, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. In this casé this court finds that the evidence was so , far conflicting as
Starr v. Campbell
STARR v. CAMPBELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR-THE ' WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 132. Argued January 23, 24, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. The restrictions on the right of alienation óf lands to be allotted
Crary v. Dye
CRARY v. DYE. ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY QF NEW MEXICO. ' ' , No. 103. Argued January 13, 14, 1908. Decided February 24, 1908. The views of the territorial courts are very persuasive on this court as to the construction of
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.