Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1909 Cases
264 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Thomas v. Iowa
THOMAS v. IOWA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IOWA. No. 448. Argued December 13, 1909. Decided December 20, 1909. A writ of error to review a judgment of the highest court of .a State, dismissed for want of jurisdiction without
Scott County Macadamized Road Co. v. Missouri ex rel. Hines
SCOTT COUNTY MACADAMIZED ROAD COMPANY v. STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. HINES, PROSECUTING ATTORNEY OF CAPE GIRARDEAU COUNTY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI; No. 52. Argued December 7, 8, 1909. Decided December 20, 1909. Fol
Graves v. Ashburn
GRAVES v. ASHBURN. CERTIORARI to the circuit court oe appeals for the FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued December 7, 1909. Decided December 20, 1909. Where the remedy at law is of doubtful adequacy and the policy of the State is clearly indicate
Illinois Central Railroad v. Sheegog
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. SHEEGOG. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 41. Argued December 12, 1909. Decided December 20, 1909. Where the joinder of the resident and the non-resident defendants prevents re
Commissioners of Santa Fé County v. Territory of New Mexico ex rel. Coler
COMMISSIONERS OF SANTA FÉ COUNTY v. TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. COLER. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE. TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICÓ. Nos. 42, 43. Submitted November 29, 1909. Decided December 20, 1909. Although a defense
United States v. Sutton
UNITED STATES v. SUTTON. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 312. Submitted October 15, 1909. Decided December 20, 1909. United States v. Celestine, ante, p. 278, followed, as to cont
King v. West Virginia
No. 444. Henry C. King, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of West Virginia et al. December 14, 1909. Mr. Maynard F. Stiles and Mr. John G: Carlisle for plaintiff in error. Mr. John F. Dillon, Mr. Harry Hubbard, Mr. Edward C. Lyon, Mrt Willia
Mills v. Johnson
MILLS v. JOHNSON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 36. Argued November 12, 1909. Decided December 13, 1909. Writ of error to review a judgment of the state court dismisse
United States v. Celestine
UNITED STATES v. CELESTINE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 235. Argued October 14, 1909. Decided December 13, 1909. Although an Indian may be made a citizen of the United States .
Rio Grande Dam & Irrigation Co. v. United States
RIO GRANDE DAM AND IRRIGATION COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. No. 49. Argued December 3, 1909. Decided December 13, 1909. Where a case is opened that further evidence may be produced,
Keiper v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States
No. 673. Nellie F. Keiper, Administratrix, etc., Petitioner, v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. December 6, 1909. Mr. J. Claude Bedford for petitioner. Mr. Thomas De Witt Cuyler for respondent..
Prame v. Ferrell
No. 666. Frank J. Prame, Petitioner, v. Albert T. Ferrell. December 6, 1909. Mr. Jesse A. Fenner for petitioner. Mr. William, Howell for respondent.
Kansas City Star Co. v. Julian
KANSAS CITY STAR COMPANY v. JULIAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 85. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 29, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. Where the Federal question is first raised in the petition t
Snyder v. Rosenbaum
SNYDER v. ROSENBAUM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA.' No. 25. Argued November 8, 9, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. In this , case the judgment of the Supreme Court of the Territory- of Oklahoma, involving contract
Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Kirven
VIRGINIA-CAROLINA CHEMICAL COMPANY v. KIRVEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME. COURT OF THE STATE OP SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 18. Argued November 2, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. The claim of plaintiff in error that proper and full credit was not given t
Lathrop, Shea & Henwood Co. v. Interior Construction & Improvement Co.
LATHROP, SHEA & HENWOOD COMPANY v. INTERIOR CONSTRUCTION AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. .ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK No. 2. Argued October 22, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. Where plaintif
United States v. Corbett
UNITED STATES v. CORBETT. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP WISCONSIN. No. 236. Argued October 14, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. Whether the person decéived by false entries is the person intende
Yordi v. Nolte
YORDI v. NOLTE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 382. Submitted October 22, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. In foreign extradition proceedings the complaint is
Southern Pacific Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. CERTIFICATE OF THE JUDGES OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 275. Argued October 12, 13, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. On auth
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Interstate Commerce Commission
BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 339. Argued October 15, 18, 1909. Decided December 6, 1909. Only distinct po
Helvetia-Swiss Fire Insurance v. Brandenstein
HELVETIA-SWISS FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BRANDENSTEIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 481. Motion to dismiss submitted November 15, 1909. Decided November 29, 1909. A writ of error to the Circuit Court of
Everett v. Everett
EVERETT v. EVERETT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 1. Argued October 22, 1909. Decided November 29, 1909. Where the fundamental fact in issue in a suit by a wife for separate- ' maintenance is whether there was a m
United States v. Stevenson
UNITED STATES v. STEVENSON (NO. 2). ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 293. Argued October 14, 15, 1909. Decided November 29, 1909. Where Congress has made an act'a crime and indictable i
United States v. Stevenson
UNITED STATES v. STEVENSON ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 292. Argued October 14, 15, 1909. Decided November 29, 1909. On writ of error taken by the United States under the Criminal A
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.