Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1909 Cases
264 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Larabee Flour Mills Co.
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. LARABEE FLOUR MILLS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP KANSAS. No. 16. Argued November 11, 12, 1908. Decided January 11, 1909. No one can be compelled to engage in the business of a commo
Magon v. United States
No. 378. R. Flores Magon et al., Appellants, v. The United States.
Montgomery v. Chatfield
No. 641. John F. Montgomery, Managing Owner, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. C. W. Chatfield, Master, etc. January 4, 1909.
Chicago & Alton Railway Co. v. United States
CHICAGO & ALTON RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. FAITHORN v. SAME. WANN v. SAME. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE ¡SEVENTH CIRCUIT.. Nos. 238, 239, 240. Argued October 21, 22, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. This co.urt by
Wilcox v. Consolidated Gas Co.
WILLCOX et al., CONSTITUTING THE PUBLIC SERVIGE COMMISSION OF NEW YORK, v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY. CITY OF NEW YORK v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF NEW YORK. JACKSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY.
City of Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.
CITY OF KNOXVILLE v. KNOXVILLE WATER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT'COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN. DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 17. Argued April 28, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Rate making is a legislative function whether e
El Paso & Southwestern Railroad v. Vizard
EL PASO AND SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. VIZARD. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 31. Argued November 30, December 1, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. In this case held that the court below co
Southern Realty Investment Co. v. Walker
SOUTHERN REALTY INVESTMENT COMPANY v. WALKER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 43. Argued December 7, 8, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. A corporation organized by citizens of one Stat
Green County v. Thomas' Executor
GREEN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, v. THOMAS' EXECUTOR. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 352. Argued December 18, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Green County v. Quinlan, ante, p. 582, followed as to t
Green County v. Quinlan
GREEN COUNTY, KENTUCKY, v. QUINLAN. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 351. Argued December 17, 18, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Findings of fact made by the Circuit Court which were not ob
Page v. Rogers
PAGE v. ROGERS, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS ' POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 39. Argued December 3, 4, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Where two courts have concurred in findings of fact in a sui
Murphy v. John Hofman Co.
EDWARD MURPHY, 2d, v. JOHN HOFMAN COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 33. Argued December 1, 2, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Where the bankruptcy court has the actual possession of property, the ' title
Hardaway v. National Surety Co.
HARDAWAY v. NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 44. Argued December 8, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. One who furnishes money and superintends the completion of work und
McLean v. Arkansas
McLEAN v. STATE OF ARKANSAS. ERROR TO .THE .SUPREME COURT OP THE SjTATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 29. Submitted November 30, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Liberty of contract which. W protected against hostile state legislation is not universal, bu
Reid v. United States
REID v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 552. Argued December 11, 14, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Suits can. be maintained against the sovereign power only by its
Rusch v. John Duncan Land & Mining Co.
RUSCH v. JOHN DUNCAN LAND AND MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 53. Argued December 14, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. The decision of the highest court of the State that a statutory notice complies wi
United States v. Freeman
UNITED STATES v. FREEMAN. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 288. Argued December 16, 17, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Decided on the authority of United States v. Biggs, ante, p. 507. The f
United States v. Sullenberger
UNITED STATES v. SULLENBERGER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 290. Argued December 16, 17, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Decided On the authority of United States v. Biggs, ante, p. 507.
United States v. Biggs
UNITED STATES v. BIGGS. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ■ DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 289. Argued December 16, 17, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. United States v. Keitel, arde, p. 370, followed as to the power of this
Miller v. New Orleans Acid & Fertilizer Co.
MILLER v. NEW ORLEANS ACID & FERTILIZER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 32. Argued December 1, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Where the átate court decides that a trustee in bankruptcy can avoid a preferen
Lemieux v. Young
LEMIEUX v. YOUNG, TRUSTEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 48. Argued December 9, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. It is within the police power of the State to regulate sales of entire stocks in trade of
Knop v. Monongahela River Consolidated Coal & Coke Co.
KNOP v. MONONGAHELA RIVER CONSOLIDATED COAL AND COKE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 449. Argued December 18, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. The mere construction of a s
Beers v. Glynn
BEERS v. GLYNN, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SURROGATES’ COURT OP THE COUNTY OP NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 45. Argued December 9, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. So far as the Federal Constitution is concerned, th
New York ex rel. Kopel v. Bingham
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. KOPEL v. BINGHAM, POLICE COMMISSIONER OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 167. Argued October 26, 1908. Decided January 4, 1909. Under § 17 of the act of
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.