Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1910 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Minnesota ex rel. Larsen v. Scott
No. 586. The State of Minnesota ex rel. Jalmer M. Larsen, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hugh R. Scott, as Auditor of the County of Hennepin. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Motion to dismiss submitted December 12, 1910. De
Herencia v. Guzman
HERENCIA v. GUZMAN. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATÉS FOR PORTO RICO. . No. 46. Submitted November 29, 1910. Decided December 19, 1910. It is not the province of this court on'writ of error to reverse if dissatisfied with the
Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. Turnipseed
MOBILE, JACKSON & KANSAS CITY RAILROAD COMPANY v. TURNIPSEED, ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. • No. 59. Submitted November 30, 1910. Decided December 19, 1910. A general classification in a state statu
Title Guaranty & Trust Co. of Scranton v. Crane Co.
TITLE GUARANTY & TRUST COMPANY OF SCRANTON, PENNSYLVANIA, v. CRANE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 67. Argued December 6, 7, 1910. Decided December 19, 1910. A vessel being constructed under contrac
Atlantic, Gulf & Pacific Co. v. Government of the Philippine Islands
THE ATLANTIC, GULF AND PACIFIC COMPANY, v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. APPEAL PROM AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 64. Argued December 6, 1910. Decided December 19, 1910. A Government contract for bui
Ex parte William W. Bierce, Ltd.
No. 4, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of William W. Bierce, Limited, Petitioner. December 12, 1910. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. Charles H. Aldrich and Mr. Henry W. Prouty for petitioner. Mr. Aldis B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton fo
National Surety Co. v. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co.
No. 782. National Surety Company, Petitioner, v. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Company. December 12, 1910. Mr. Frank Hagerman for petitioner. Mr. James S. Botsford for respondent.
City of Columbus v. Mercantile Trust & Deposit Co.
CITY OF COLUMBUS v. MERCANTILE TRUST AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF BALTIMORE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 41. Argued November 7, 8, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. To furnish an amp
City of Memphis v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
CITY OF MEMPHIS v. CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 42. Argued November 8, 9, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. The right of the Circuit
Thompson v. Thompson
THOMPSON v. THOMPSON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 17. Argued October 27, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. At common law husband and wife were regarded as one, the legal existence of the latter during cover
United States v. Kissel
UNITED STATES v. KISSEL and HARNED. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 390. Argued November 10, 11, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. Under the Criminal Appeals Act of .March 2, 1907, c
Calder v. Michigan ex rel. Attorney General
CALDER v. THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Ex rel. ATTORNEY GENERAL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 58. Argued November 29, 30, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. This court does not inquire into the knowledge, negligence, met
Hunter v. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance
HUNTER v. MUTUAL RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 39. Argued November 7, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. A few separate and disconnected transactions by a foreign corporation after, i
Griffith v. Connecticut
GRIFFITH, alias GRIFFIN v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 515. Motion to dismiss or affirm. Submitted November 28, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. Decided on authority of Griffit
Griffith v. Connecticut
GRIFFITH v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 514. Motion to dismiss or affirm. Submitted November 28, 1910. Decided December 12, 1910. Fixing maximum rates of interest on money loan
Foster v. Boulo
No. 797. Amanda C. Foster, Petitioner, v. Luciano F. Boulo, Executrix, etc. December 5, 1910. Mr. J. Blocker Thornton and Mr. Frederick G. Bromberg for petitioner. Mr. Harry Pillans for respondent.
Trimble v. Klugh
No. 61. Mary R. Trimble et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Ida V. Klugh et al. In error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of South Carolina. Argued December 2, 1910. Decided December 5, 1910. Mr. William A. Gunter for
Ex parte Bradford
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of H. A. Bradford, Petitioner. Submitted November 28, 1910. Decided December 5, 1910. Mr. George P. Hoover and Mr. William E. Borah for petitioner. No one opposing.
Illinois Central Railroad v. Kentucky
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 16. Argued October 26, 27, 1910. Decided December 5, 1910. If the law of the State permits it, the fact that the maki
United States v. Heinze
UNITED STATES v. HEINZE, NO. 2. No. 671. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued November 3, 1910. Decided December 5, 1910. United States v. Heinze, ante, p. 532, followed as to suffici
United States v. Heinze
UNITED STATES v. HEINZE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 380. Argued November 3, 1910. Decided December 5, 1910. Where the Circuit Court held the indictment insufficient because the
J. M. Guffey Petroleum Co. v. Coastwise Transportation Co.
Nos. 773 and 774. The J. M. Guffey Petroleum Company, Petitioner, v. The Coastwise Transportation Company. November 28, 1910. Mr. D. T. Watson, Mr. C. C. Burlingham and Mr. James H. Beal for petitioner. Mr. Edward E. Blodgett and Mr. J. Par
Willcox v. Jones
No. 747. P. A. Willcox, Receiver, etc., Petitioner, v. Leila A. Jones, Administratrix, etc. November 28, 1910. Mr. Henry E. Davis for petitioner. Mr. Walter Hazard for respondent.
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Blachley
No. 34. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. J. B. Blachley. In error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fifth Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas. Submitted November 2, 1910. Decided November 28,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.