Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1910 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Mason
UNITED STATES v. MASON. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 510, 511, 512. Argued October 18, 19, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Clerks of the Federal courts
Eagle Mining & Improvement Co. v. Hamilton
EAGLE MINING & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. HAMILTON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 51. Submitted November 7, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Under the Territorial Practice Act of April 7, 1874, c. 80, 18 Stat
United States ex rel. Hine v. Morse
UNITED STATES TO THE USE OF HINE v. MORSE AND OTHERS, EXECUTORS OF CLARKE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 25. Argued November 1, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Even if the bill seeking a sale of infant’s pr
Richardson v. McChesney
RICHARDSON v. McCHESNEY, SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 23. Argued October 31, November 1, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. The duty of this court is limited t
Chantangco v. Abaroa
CHANTANGCO v. ABAROA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 2. Submitted October 24, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. The general rule of the common law is that a judgment in a criminal proceeding cannot be read in evide
United States v. Ansonia Brass & Copper Co.
UNITED STATES v. ANSONIA BRASS AND COPPER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 458. Argued October 18, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Where the United States claimed in an action in the state court
Harlan v. McGourin
HARLAN v. McGOURIN, MARSHAL. GALLAGHER v. THE SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Nos. 378, 379. Argued October 11, 12, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. The writ of habeas corpus c
Fisher v. City of New Orleans
FISHER v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 43. Argued November 9, 10, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. The jurisdiction of this court, under the contract clause of the Federal Constitution, exte
Arkansas Southern Railway Co. v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co.
ARKANSAS SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. LOUISIANA AND ARKANSAS RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA. No. 38. Argued November 4, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. This court must satisfy itself whether or not the party claimi
Moore Printing Typewriter Co. v. National Savings & Trust Co.
MOORE PRINTING TYPEWRITER COMPANY v. NATIONAL SAVINGS AND TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 21. Argued October 27, 28, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Where the prayer of a bill by a trustee i
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Commercial Milling Co.
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. COMMERCIAL MILLING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 15. Argued October 26, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Intercourse between the States by telegraph is interstate commer
Moffitt v. Kelly
MOFFITT v. KELLY, TREASURER OF ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 37. Argued November 4, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. The Constitution, of- the United States does, not, as a general ru
Roura v. Government of the Philippine Islands
ROURA v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 35. Argued November 3, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Jurisdiction as to amount in controversy sustained on the facts disclosed in af
Montezuma Canal Co. v. Smithville Canal Co.
MONTEZUMA CANAL COMPANY v. SMITHVILLE CANAL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 1. Argued October 21, 24, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Where the trial court makes findings of facts and states conclusi
Wetmore v. Tennessee Copper Co.
WETMORE v. TENNESSEE COPPER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 500. Motion to dismiss appeal. Submitted October 11, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Ladew v. Tennessee Copp
Ladew v. Tennessee Copper Co.
LADEW v. TENNESSEE COPPER COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 495. Argued October 19, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Plaintiffs, citizens of States other than that of the
National Bank of Commerce v. Downie
NATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE v. DOWNIE, TRUSTEE. SEATTLE NATIONAL BANK v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 31, 32. Argued November 3, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. The prohibition of §3477, Rev. St
Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railway Co. v. City of Connersville
CINCINNATI, INDIANAPOLIS AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CITY OF CONNERSVILLE. ERROR TO-THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 19. Submitted October 25, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. A. railway corporation accepts its franchise fr
Hooe v. United States
HOOE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 13. Argued October 25, 26, 1910. Decided November 28, 1910. Congress, proceeding under the Constitution, declares what amount shall be drawn from the Treasury in pursuance of an ap
Brown v. Horr
No. 126. William M. Brown, Appellant, v. John F. Horr, Marshal of the United States, etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Florida. November 14, 1910. Mr. Frederick C. Bryan and Mr. George M.
Eidman v. Shepard
No. 764. Ferdinand Eidman, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. Henry B. Shepard, Executor, etc. November 14, 1910. The Attorney General for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Wabash Railroad v. Pollitz
No. 719. The Wabash Railroad Company et al., Petitioners, v. James Pollitz. November 14, 1910. Mr. Lawrence Greer, Mr. Rush Taggart and Mr. F. C. Nicodemus, Jr., for petitioners. Mr. Stephen M. Yeaman and Mr. J. Aspinwall Hodge for responde
In re Metropolitan Trust Co. of New York
IN RE METROPOLITAN TRUST COMPANY OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK. APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR MANDAMUS. No. 12. Original. Submitted May 16, 1910. Restored to the docket for oral argument May 31, 1910. Argued October 11, 1910. Decided N
Ling Su Fan v. United States
LING SU FAN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 20. Argued October 27, 1910. Decided November 14, 1910. On writ of error the errors considered must be only those of law, and this court eaftnot conside
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.