Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1911 Cases
217 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mackenzie v. Woods
No. 154. R. M. Mackenzie, Trustee, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Lawrence C. Woods. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Pennsylvania. April 25, 1911. Mr. Lowrie C. Barton for the plaintiff in error. Mr. A. Leo Weil for the defendant i
Day v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
No. 996. W. T. Day, Petitioner, v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company. April 24, 1911. Mr. Frederick S. Tyler and Mr. A. J. Montague for the petitioner. Mr. William B. Mcllwaine for the respondent.
Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Co. v. Boise City
No. 970. The Boise Artesian Hot & Cold Water Company, Limited, Petitioner, v. Boise City, Idaho. April 24, 1911. Mr. W. B. Heyburn and Mr. Richard H. Johnson for the petitioner. Mr. Oliver O. Haga for the respondent.
Ripley v. United States
RIPLEY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. RIPLEY. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Nos. 887, 888. Submitted March 10, 1911. Decided April 24, 1911. This court may not draw an inference of bad faith on the part of a government inspector unl
Sac & Fox Indians of Mississippi in Iowa v. Sac & Fox Indians of Mississippi in Oklahoma
SAC AND FOX INDIANS OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN IOWA v. SAC AND FOX INDIANS OF THE MISSISSIPPI IN OKLAHOMA, AND THE UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 614. Argued December 14, 15, 1910. Decided April 24, 1911. The provision in th
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Tamer
No. 168. The Western Union Telegraph Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. George J. Tamer. Error to the Circuit Court of Wise County, State of Virginia. April 18, 1911. Mr. George H. Fearons, Mr. Rush Taggart, Mr. Francis Raymond Stark and Mr. H
United States v. Brooke
No. 830. The United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Fred A. Brooke et al., etc. Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. April 17, 1911. The Attorney General for the plaintiff in error. Mr. W. W
Eagle White Lead Co. v. Pflugh
No. 976. The Eagle White Lead Company, Petitioner, v. Albert Pflugh et al. April 17, 1911. Mr. William H. Singleton and Mr. Charles E. Biordon for the petitioner. Mr. Clifton V. Edwards and Mr. Robert Watson for the respondent.
Rat Portage Lumber Co. v. State of Minnesota
No. 120. Rat Portage Lumber Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Minnesota; Lesure Lumber Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Minnesota. and No. 121. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Argued April 11, 19
Devou v. Cincinnati, Covington & Erlanger Railway Co.
No. 123. William P. Devou, Executor of Sarah O. Devou, Deceased, Plaintiff in Error, v. Cincinnati, Covington & Erlanger Railway Company. Error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky. Argued for the plaintiff in error April 12, 19
J. W. Perry Co. v. City of Norfolk
J. W. PERRY COMPANY v. CITY OF NORFOLK. H. WHITE v. CITY OF NORFOLK. ERROR to the supreme court op appeals op the STATE OP VIRGINIA. Nos. 103, 104. Argued March 16, 1911. Decided April 17, 1911. Whether a municipality may list and tax its o
Wilson v. United States
WILSON v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO, AND APPEALS FROM, THE CIRCUIT COURT OF "THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN. DISTRICT OF • NEW YORK. Nos. 759, 760, 788. Argued .March 2, 3, 1911. Decided April 15, 1911. Hale v.
Worth, Maison La Ferriere & Guillot & Cie v. Chase
No. 966. Worth, Maison La Ferriere and Guillot & Cie, Petitioners, v. Charles A. Chase, Trustee, etc. April 10, 1911. 'Mr. Samuel W. Cooper- for the petitioners. No appearance for the respondent.
Bird v. Ashton
No. 328. George Bird et al., Individually and as Trustees, etc., Appellants, v. James M. Ashton et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Washington. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 3,
Shawnee Sewerage & Drainage Co. v. Stearns
SHAWNEE SEWERAGE AND DRAINAGE COMPANY v. STEARNS, AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF SHAWNEE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP OKLAHOMA. No. 109. Submitted March 14, 1911. Decided April 10, 1911. A simple
Standard Paint Co. v. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co.
STANDARD PAINT COMPANY v. TRINIDAD ASPHALT MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 106. Argued March 16, 1911. Decided April 10, 1911. No sign or form of words can be appropriated as a val
Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.
DIAMOND RUBBER COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. CONSOLIDATED RUBBER TIRE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 36. Argued February 28, March 1, 1911. Decided April 10, 1911. Where a device possesses such amou
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co. v. Willard
CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILWAY COMPANY v. WILLARD. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 105. Submitted March 17, 1911. Decided April 10, 1911. On. every writ of error or appeal the first and fundam
Corp. of St. Anthony in New Bedford v. Houlihan
No. 924. The Corporation of St. Anthony in New Bedford, Petitioner, v. Michael J. Houlihan. April 3, 1911. Mr. James E. Cotter for the petitioner. Mr. Franklin T. Hammond for the respondent.
Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co.
DR. MILES MEDICAL COMPANY v. JOHN D. PARK & SONS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 72. Argued January 4, 5, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. An actionable wrong is committed by one who maliciously in
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Crovo
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. CROVO. ERROR TO THE LAW AND EQUITY COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, STATE OF VIRGINIA, AND THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. Nos. 81, 87. Argued March 6, 7, 1911. Decided. April 3, 1911.
Vilas v. City of Manila
VILAS v. CITY OF MANILA. TRIGAS v. SAME. AGUADO v. SAME. ERROR TO AND APPEALS PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. Nos. 53, 54, 207. Argued February 24; 27, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. Even if there is no remedy adequate to th
Gavieres v. United States
GAVIERES v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 102. Submitted March 13, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. Protection against double jeopardy was by § 5 of the act of July 1, 1902, c. 1369, 32 Stat. 691, carr
Hills & Co. v. Hoover
HILLS & COMPANY, LIMITED, v. HOOVER. CERTIFICATE from the circuit court of appeals for THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 101. Argued March 15, 16, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. The copyright statutes of the United States afford all the relief to which
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.