Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1911 Cases
217 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. O'Brien
UNITED STATES v. O’BRIEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS A MEMBER OF THE FIRM OF PERKINS & O’BRIEN. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 108. Argued March 17, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. The word “ annul ” a
Arnett v. Reade
ARNETT v. READE. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. ■ No. 98. Argued March 14, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. Under the law of New Mexico of 1901, providing that both husband and wife must join in conveyances of rea
Enriquez v. Go-Tiongco
ENRIQUEZ v. GO-TIONGCO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 95. Argued March 13, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. The Supreme Court of the Philippine Islands having held that on the death of the wife the husband, if sur
Oklahoma ex rel. West v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA ON THE RELATION OF WEST, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 96. Argued March 13,. 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. Oklahoma v. Atchis
Oklahoma ex rel. West, Attorney General v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, ON THE RELATION OF WEST, ATTORNEY GENERAL, v. GULF, COLORADO & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. BILL IN EQUITY. No. 14, Original. Argued February 23; 24, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. C
Oklahoma v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. BILL IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Argued February 23, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. While the territorial condition lasts the governmental power of Congress over a Territory
United States v. Erie Railroad
UNITED STATES v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY. SAME v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY. SAME v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 537, 538, 539.
United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
UNITED STATES v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 536. Argued January 5, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. The rule that the allowance of amendments
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western Railroad
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. DELAWARE, LACKAWANNA & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 325. Argued February 25, 28, 1910. Decided April 3, 1911. The c
Blanco v. Hubbard, United States Marshal for Porto Rico
BLANCO v. HUBBARD, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR PORTO RICO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 111. Argued March 17, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. A demurrer in this case having been sustained, and the bill
Fernandez v. Perez
PEREZ y FERNANDEZ v. FERNANDEZ y PEREZ. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 110. Argued March 17, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. Where the District Court of the United States for Porto Rico has general juri
Martinez v. International Banking Corp.
MARTINEZ v. INTERNATIONAL BANKING CORPORATION. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. Nos. 79, 80. Argued March 3, 6, 1911. Decided April 3, 1911. The value of the matter in dispute in this court is the test
Ex parte Oklahoma
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA (No. 2). No. 10. Original. Argued April 4, 5, 1910; ordered for reargument before full bench May 31, 1910; reargued February 23,1911. Decided April 3, 1911. Writs of prohibition refused on au
Ex parte Oklahoma
EX PARTE: IN THE MATTER OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, BY CHARLES N. HASKELL, GOVERNOR, ETC., PETITIONER. No. 9, Original. Argued April 4, 5, 1910; ordered for reargument before full bench May 31, 1910; reargued February 23, 1911. Decided April
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. United States
BALTIMORE AND OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH ' CIRCUIT. Nos. 7, 8. Argued March 4, 1910; restored to docket for reargument April 4, 1910; reargued January 5; 6, 1911.
Taylor v. Leesnitzer
TAYLOR v. LEESNITZER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT • OF COLUMBIA. No. 45. Argued March 8, 1911. Decided March 20, 1911. Although generally slow to overrule decisions of courts other than .those of the -United States on q
In re Eastern Cherokees
MATTER OF EASTERN CHEROKEES, PETITIONERS. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 15, Original. Argued February 20, 1911. Decided March 20, 1911. Mandamus to Court of Claims to require it to modify its decree to conform to a decree of this court
Box Elder Power & Light Co. v. Brigham City
No. 94. Box Elder Power & Light Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Brigham City. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Utah. Argued for the plaintiff in error and submitted for the défendant in error March 10, 1911. Decided March 13, 1911
Perryman v. Coleman
No. 90. Ira Perryman, by O. H. Perryman, his Next Friend, Plaintiff in Error, v. Thomas W. Coleman, Jr., Judge, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama. Submitted for the plaintiff in error March 10, 1911. Decided March 13,
Zonne v. Minneapolis Syndicate
ZONNE v. MINNEAPOLIS SYNDICATE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP MINNESOTA. No. 627. Argued January 19, 1911. Decided March 13, 1911. A corporation, the sole purpose whereof is to hold title to a single
Eliot v. Freeman
ELIOT v. FREEMAN. MAINE BAPTIST MISSIONARY CONVENTION v. COTTING. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 448, 496. Argued January 19, 1911. Decided March 13, 1911. It was the intention of
Flint v. Stone Tracy Co.
FLINT v. STONE TRACY COMPANY. VAN DERHOEFF v. CONEY ISLAND AND BROOKLYN RAILROAD COMPANY. HINE v. HOME LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. SMITH v. NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY. MINER v. CORN EXCHANGE NATIONAL BANK. CEDAR STREET COMPANY v. PARK REALTY COMPAN
Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.
LINDSLEY v. NATURAL CARBONIC GAS COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED. STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 260. Argued January 3, 4, 1911. Decided March 13, 1911. Courts of the United States must accept the con
Hipolite Egg Co. v. United States
HIPOLITE EGG COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 519. Submitted January 5, 1911. Decided March 13, 1911. The object of the Pure Pood and Drug
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.