Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1914 Cases
315 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Holt v. Henley
HOLT v. HENLEY, TRUSTEE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 229. Argued March 5, 1914. Decided March 16, 1914. The amendment to the Bankruptcy Act of June 25, 1910, giving the trustees, as to all property c
Curriden v. Middleton
CURRIDEN v. MIDDLETON. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 152. Submitted March 4, 1914. Decided March 16, 1914. The proper remedy for damages caused by fraud and deception is an action at law.. Buzará v. Houst
Porto Rico v. Ramos
PEOPLE OF PORTO RICO v. RAMOS. ■ ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR PORTO RICO. No. 390. Submitted February 25, 1914. Decided March 16, 1914. Immunity of sovereignty from suit without consent does not permit the sovereign
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Kennedy
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. KENNEDY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 246. Submitted March 9, 1914. Decided March 16, 1914. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. v. Polt, ante, p. 165, follow
de Galard de Brassac de Bearn v. Winans
No. 557. Louis Elie Joseph Henry de Galard de Brassac de Bearn, Count and Prince of Bearn and Chalais, Plaintiff in Error, v. Ross R. Winans and Ferdinand C. Latrobe, Trustees, et al. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Marylan
Williamson v. Osenton
WILLIAMSON v. OSENTON. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 634. Submitted February 24, 1914. Decided March 9, 1914. The essential fact that raises change of abode to change of domicil is the absence of
Priest v. Trustees of Las Vegas
PRIEST v. TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF LAS VEGAS, NEW MEXICO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 218. Submitted January 28, 1914. Decided March 9, 1914. A judgment in a suit to quiet title to real property in New M
Young v. Central Railroad
YOUNG, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF NEW JERSEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 389. Argued February 26, 1914. Decided March 9, 1914. The Circuit Court of Appeals having, pursuant to the st
United States ex rel. Brown v. Lane
UNITED STATES EX REL. BROWN v. LANE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. APPLICATION FOB ALLOWANCE OF WBIT OF EBEOB. No. Submitted February 24, 1914. Decided March 2, 1914. Although, on the face of the record, this court may have jurisdiction to rev
Paine v. Copper Belle Mining Co.
PAINE v. COPPER BELLE MINING COMPANY OF ARIZONA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT. OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 181. Submitted January 21, 1914. Decided March 2, 1914. The meaning of the arrangement between the parties having been matter f
Ohio River & Western Railway Co. v. Dittey
OHIO TAX CASES. OHIO RIVER AND WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. DITTEY ET AL., AS THE TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO. MARIETTA, COLUMBUS AND CLEVELAND RAILROAD COMPANY v. CREAMER ET AL., AS THE TAX COMMISSION OF OHIO. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF T
Weinman v. de Palma
WEINMAN v. de PALMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. No. 173. Argued January 20, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. Where the owner of demised premises makes a contract with an adjoining owner for construction of a
Wilson v. United States
WILSON, ALIAS CHARLES WILLARD, v. UNITED STATES. WILSON, ALIAS ZOE WILLARD, v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 168, 169. Submitted October 23, 1913. Decided Februar
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. City of Goldsboro
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CITY OF GOLDSBORO, NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 112. Argued December 10, 1913. Decided February 24, 1914. Whether a municipal ordinance is within the
Plymouth Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania
PLYMOUTH COAL COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 102. Argued January 15, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. The business of mining coal is so attended with danger as to render
Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. Minnesota
FARMERS AND MECHANICS SAVINGS BANK OF MINNEAPOLIS v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 39. Argued May 8, 1913. Decided February 24, 1914. A question though novel itself may be solved by the applic
Great Northern Railway Co. v. O'Connor
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. O’CONNOR. ERROR TO ' THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 473. Submitted January 6, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. The rule that carriers are not concerned with questions of title but must tre
D. E. Foote & Co. v. Stanley
D. E. FOOTE & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. STANLEY, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. EEEOE TO THE COUET OF .APPEALS OF THE STATE OF ' MAEYLAND, No. 159. Argued January 16, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. The Federal Constitution prohibit
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cramer
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CRAMER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 156. Submitted January 16, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. The Hepburn Act of 1906, amending the Interstate Commerce Act, establ
Pronovost v. United States
PRONOVOST v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP MONTANA. - No. 128. Submitted January 15, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. Under tbe act of January 30,1897, 29 Stat. 506, it is an offense aga
Perrin v. United States
PERRIN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 707. Submitted January 13, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. Congress bas power to prohibit the introduction of intoxicating liqu
Thurston v. United States
THURSTON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 605. Submitted December 22, 1913. Decided February 24, 1914. The Court of Claims has no general jurisdiction over claims against the United States and can take cognizance only
United States v. Beatty
UNITED STATES v. BEATTY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 555. Argued January 12, 13, 1914. Decided February 24, 1914. A judgment of the- Circuit Court of Appeals, reversing a judgment of the District Court
Gauthier v. Morrison
GAUTHIER v. MORRISON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 157. Argued December 19, 1913. Decided February 24, 1914. Where one specially asserts in the state court a right predicated on the statutes of the United State
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.