Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1914 Cases
315 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Carondelet Canal & Navigation Co. v. Louisiana
CARONDELET CANAL AND NAVIGATION COMPANY v. STATE OF LOUISIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 78. Argued March 16, 17, 1914. Decided April 20, 1914. As the judgment of the state court disposed of, and ordered the
Ex parte Evans
No. -. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Henry H. Evans, Petitioner. Submitted April 6, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. Mr. Albert J. Hopkins for the petitioner.
Synnott v. Tombstone Consolidated Mines Co.
No. 879. Thomas W. Synnott, etc., Appellant, v. The Tombstone Consolidated Mines Company, Limited, etc. Appeal from the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted April 6, 1914. Decid
Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. George
TENNESSEE COAL, IRON & RAILROAD COMPANY v. GEORGE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 299. Argued March 17, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. While the courts of a State are bound to give full faith and credit to all sub
Farrugia v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
FARRUGIA v. PHILADELPHIA & READING RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ' THE EASTERN . DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 823. Argued March 2, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. The provision in § 238, Judicial Code,
White v. Island Transportation Co.
WHITE v. ISLAND TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 206. Submitted January 26, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. The jurisdiction of a district court in a proce
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Iowa
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF IOWA. EEEOE TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP IOWA. No. 176. Argued March 3, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. Whether commerce is interstate or intrastate must be determined by the
Hammond Packing Co. v. Montana
HAMMOND PACKING COMPANY v. STATE OF MONTANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA. No. 278. Submitted March 11, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. So long as it .does not interfere with interstate commerce, a State may restrict the
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Anderson
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. ANDERSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 319. Argued March 20, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. A State may impose double damages and an attorney’s fee on railway companies for
O'Sullivan v. Felix
O’SULLIVAN v. FELIX. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 249. Submitted March 9, 1914. Decided April 13, 1914. That an action depends upon, or arises under, the laws of the United States, does not preclude the a
Clinchfield Coal Corp. v. Maness
No. 887. Clinchfield Coal Corporation, Plaintiff in Error, v. R. L. Maness. In error to the Supreme' Court of the State of Tennessee. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted March 23, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Mr. John W. Price and Mr. J.
Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. Brickell
SINGER SEWING MACHINE COMPANY v. BRICKELL, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 458. Argued January 12, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Where or
Lewis v. Frick
LEWIS v. FRICK, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION INSPECTOR. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 208. Argued January 28, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Where an alien enters this country more than once, the period of
Tevis v. Ryan
TEVIS v. RYAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 189. Argued January 23, 26, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Covenants in a contract between individuals who control a corporation, in regard to disposition of its outst
Franklin v. Lynch
FRANKLIN v. LYNCH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 553. Submitted February 25, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. The act of April 2Í, 1904, c. 1402, 33 Stat. 189, 204, removing restrictions on alienation of lands of non-
American Iron & Steel Manufacturing Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway
AMERICAN IRON AND STEEL MANUFACTURING CO. v. SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 233. Argued March. 6, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Whatever may have been the English and earl
El Paso Brick Co. v. McKnight
EL PASO BRICK COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. JOHN H. McKnight. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 185. Argued January 22, 23, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Locators of mining claims have the exclusive right of possessi
Diamond Coal & Coke Co. v. United States
DIAMOND COAL AND COKE CO. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF,APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 192. Argued January 28, 29, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. A patent for mineral lands secured under a non-mineral-land law by fra
United States v. Birdsall
UNITED STATES v. BIRDSALL. UNITED STATES v. BRENTS. UNITED STATES v. VAN WERT. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. Nos. 727, 728, 729. Submitted and argued January 8, 9, 1914. Restored to dock
Union Lime Co. v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
UNION LIME COMPANY v. CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 529. Argued March 2, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. In determining its constitutionality a state statute must be read in
Russell v. Sebastian
RUSSELL v. SEBASTIAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 415. Argued January 6, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. In determining the question of impairment under the contract clause of the Constitution it is the duty of t
Myers v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.
MYERS v. PITTSBURGH COAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 816. Argued February 27, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. The duty of the master to use reasonable diligence to provide a safe place for the
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Moore
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. MOORE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 451. Argued February 26, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Decided on authority of the preceding case. The facts are stated in the opi
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Robinson
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. ROBINSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 450. Argued February 26, 1914. Decided April 6, 1914. Where the state court by its ruling denies the carrier the benefit of th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.