Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kryger v. Wilson
KRYGER v. WILSON ET AL., ADMINISTRATORS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH DAKOTA. No. 99. Submitted November 13, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Whether the cancellation of a land contract is governed by the law of the situs
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Whitacre
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. WHITACRE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 71. Argued November 7, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. In the absence of clear and palpable error,,this court will not disturb the co
Kane v. New Jersey
KANE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 51. Argued October 31, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. In- regulating the use of motor vehicles upon its highways, (Hendrick v. Maryland,
Hutchinson Ice Cream Co. v. Iowa
HUTCHINSON ICE CREAM COMPANY ET AL. v. STATE OF IOWA. CROWL v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE IOWA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 40, 50. Argued November 13, 1916. De
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Beaham
NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY v. BEAHAM. BEROB TO THE KANSAS CITY COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 118. Argued November 16, 1916 Decided December 4, 1916. 'When a passenger claims damages from a carrier for the lo
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Capital Trust Co.
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CAPITAL TRUST COMPANY, ADMINISTRATOR OF WARD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MINNESOTA. No. 107. Submitted November 15,1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Such pain and suffering as are substantiall
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McLaughlin
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. McLAUGHLIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT . OF POCAHONTAS COUNTY, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 100. Argued November 14, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. A stipulation in a “uniform live stock contract” signed
McIntyre v. Kavanaugh
McINTYRE v. KAVANAUGH. error to the supreme court of the state of new YORK. No. 88. Argued November 10, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Partners are individually responsible for torts committed by their firm while acting within the general
Alder v. Edenborn
ALDER v. EDENBORN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 9. Argued May 5, 1915; restored to docket for reargument April 3, 1916; reargued October 23, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Decided on authority of S
Sim v. Edenborn
SIM v. EDENBORN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 8. Argued May 5, 1915; restored to docket for reargument April 3, 1916; reargued October 23, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Respondent induced petition
Stewart v. Ramsay
STEWART v. RAMSAY. ERROR to the district court oe the united states FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. • No. 105. Argued November 15, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. A direct writ of error lies, under Judicial Code, § 238, to test the j
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Sonman Shaft Coal Co.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. SONMAN SHAFT COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 10. Argued May 14,1915; restored to docket for reargument June 14, 1915; reargued October 25, 1915. Decided December 4,
Kansas City, Memphis & Birmingham Railroad v. Stiles
KANSAS CITY, MEMPHIS & BIRMINGHAM RAILROAD COMPANY v. STILES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 212. Submitted October 17, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Three corporations, formed, and ■ operating railways, in Alabam
Swift & Co. v. Hoover
SWIFT & COMPANY ET AL. v. HOOVER. ERROR TO AND APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 101. Submitted November 14, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. A decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia refusing to
Seton Hall College v. Village of South Orange
SETON HALL COLLEGE v. VILLAGE OF SOUTH ORANGE ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW JERSEY. No. 74. Submitted November 3, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Nine years after the incorporation and establishment of a college unde
Pennsylvania Railroad v. W. F. Jacoby & Co.
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. W. F. JACOBY & COMPANY. ON CERTIFICATE FROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued October 20, 1915; affirmed by divided court November 15, 1915; restored to doc
United States v. Oppenheimer
UNITED STATES v. OPPENHEIMER ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT'OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 412. Argued October 19, 20, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. A “motion to quash” an indictment, based upon a form
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. United States
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE -DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 290. Argued October 13, 16, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Und
Atlantic City Railroad v. Parker
ATLANTIC CITY RAILROAD COMPANY v. PARKER. ERROR TO THE COURT OP ERRORS AND APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW JERSEY. No. 111. Argued November 16, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Iu this action for personal injury, governed by the Safety Appliance
Lehon v. City of Atlanta
LEHON v. CITY OF ATLANTA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 103. Submitted November 14, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Ordinances of a city which subject the business of private detectives and detective agencies to
Ex parte United States
EX PARTE UNITED STATES, PETITIONER. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 11, Original. Argued January 10, 11, 1916. Decided December 4, 1916. Mandamus, out of this court,-is a proper repedy for enforcing a crim- ■ inal sentence where the Dist
O'Neil v. Northern Colorado Irrigation Co.
O’NEIL v. NORTHERN COLORADO IRRIGATION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 68. Argued November 6, 1916. Decided November 20, 1916. Under the laws of Colorado here applicable, as construed by her highest court,
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. City of Raleigh
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. CITY OF RALEIGH. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 59. Argued November 1, 1916. Decided November 20, 1916. Herein the action of the Board of Alde
Illinois Surety Co. v. Miller
No. 82. Illinois Surety Company, Appellant, v. Frank Miller et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York. Argued for appellees and submitted for appellant November 9, 1916. Decided November
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.