Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1916 Cases
296 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Mims
SUPREME LODGE, KNIGHTS OF PYTHIAS v. MIMS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 345. Argued May 1, 2, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. Where the case necessarily turns on the con
Brown v. Pacific Coast Coal Co.
BROWN v. PACIFIC COAST COAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 303. Argued March 14, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. In a case where its jurisdiction rests on diverse citizenship, it is the duty of t
Ohio ex rel. Davis v. Hildebrant
STATE OF OHIO ON RELATION OF DAVIS v. HILDEBRANT, SECRETARY OF STATE OF OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. No. 987. Submitted May 22, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. Whether the guarantee of a republican form of government
New York ex rel. Kennedy v. Becker
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ON THE RELATION OF KENNEDY v. BECKER, AS SHERIFF OF ERIE COUNTY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 666. Argued April 7, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. Power to preserve fish and game with
Lancaster v. Kathleen Oil Co.
LANCASTER v. KATHLEEN OIL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA. No. 336. Submitted April 26, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. As one not in possession may not maintain an action to qu
Reid v. Fargo
REID v. FARGO, AS PRESIDENT OF THE AMERICAN EXPRESS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 279. Argued March 13, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. In the Second Circuit, the practice is well established t
Missouri v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad
STATE OF MISSOURI v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON & QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY. MOTION TO STRIKE A DEFENSE PROM THE ANSWER. No. 16, Original. Argued May 2, 3, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. In exerting the public rate-making power a State cannot, without
Virginia v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. PETITION FOR A WRIT OF EXECUTION. No. 2, Original. Submitted June 5, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. A State should be given an opportunity to accept and abide by the decision of this court;
Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. Campbell
SPOKANE & INLAND EMPIRE RAILROAD COMPANY v. CAMPBELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 325. Argued April 26, 1916. Decided June 12, 1916. la an action under the Employers’ Liability Act brought by an engineer
Lewis v. International Steam Pump Co.
No. 1015. William I. Lewis, etc., Petitioner, v. International Steam Pump Company et al. June 5, 1916. Mr. Merritt Lane and Mr. W. Bourke Cochran for the petitioner. Mr. Charles H. Bussell, Mr. Paul D. Cravath and Mr. William W. Green for t
H. B. Hollins & Co. v. Everett
No. 985. H. B. Hollins & Company, Petitioner, v. A. Leo Everett, as Receiver, etc. June 5, 1916. Mr. Charles K. Beekman and Mr. William C. Armstrong for the petitioners. Mr. Leonard B. Smith for the respondent.
Ex parte Robinson
No.-. Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Elbert R. Robinson, Petitioner. Submitted May 22, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. Mr. Richard E. Westbrooks for the petitioner.
Duel v. Hollins
DUEL v. HOLLINS. WIENER, LEVY & CO. v. HOLLINS. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 352, 353. Argued May 4, 5, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. A bankrupt firm of brokers having, prior to bankruptcy carried on
New York Life Insurance v. Dunlevy
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. DUNLEVY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 290. Argued May 14, 15, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. A party to an action does Hot after final judgment still remain in court'
Bingham v. Bradley
BINGHAM v. BRADLEY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN. DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 592. Submitted April 4, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. This court
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Gainey
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. GAINEY, ADMINISTRATOR OF DWYER. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP KENTUCKY. No. 453. Submitted April 19, 20, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. v. Bombolis, ante, p. 21
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kelly
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. KELLY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF KELLY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 321. Argued April 19, 20, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. Minneapolis & St. Louis R. R. v. Bombolis, ante, p. 211,
San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Wagner
SAN ANTONIO & ARANSAS PASS RAILWAY COMPANY v. WAGNER. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 311. Submitted April 14, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. Where the highest court of th
Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. Bower
CHICAGO AND NORTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOWER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. No. 301. Argued March 16, 17, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. While the employer is under a duty to exercise ordinary care to supply machine
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Proffitt
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. PROFFITT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 273. Argued March 10, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. The danger to a brakeman at work in switching at one end of a “ manifest ” tr
Montelibano y Ramos v. La Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas
MONTELIBANO Y RAMOS v. LA COMPANIA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 217. Submitted March 8, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. In an action of an equitable nature the proper
Pacific Live Stock Co. v. Lewis
PACIFIC LIVE STOCK COMPANY v. LEWIS, ET AL., CONSTITUTING THE STATE WATER BOARD OF THE STATE OF OREGON. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 300. Argued March 16, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. No
Levindale Lead & Zinc Mining Co. v. Coleman
LEVINDALE LEAD AND ZINC MINING COMPANY v. COLEMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT 'OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 322. Argued April 25, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. A statute should, if possible, be construed in the light of its obvious policy; a
St. Louis & Kansas City Land Co. v. Kansas City
ST. LOUIS AND KANSAS CITY LAND COMPANY v. KANSAS CITY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 261. Argued March 7, 1916. Decided June 5, 1916. The extent of the authority conferred upon a city by its charter, the construct
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.