Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Branson v. Bush
BRANSON, SHERIFF AND COLLECTOR OF CRAWFORD COUNTY, ET AL. v. BUSH, RECEIVER OF THE ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 82. Argued November 14, 1919. — Dec
Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal
GODCHAUX COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. ESTOPINAL, SHERIFF OF THE PARISH OF ST. BERNARD, ET AL. ERROR TÓ THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 101. Argued November 17, 18, 1919. — Decided December 22, 1919. A writ of error will not li
Hardin-Wyandot Lighting Co. v. Village of Upper Sandusky
HARDIN-WYANDOT LIGHTING COMPANY v. VILLAGE OF UPPER SANDUSKY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 10. Argued October 13, 1918. — Decided December 15, 1919. The law of Ohio providing that the mode of use of village streets b
Sullivan v. City of Shreveport
SULLIVAN v. CITY OF SHREVEPORT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 89. Submitted November 17, 1919. — Decided December 15, 1919. The enforcement of a city ordinance requiring each street car to be operated by a motor-
Hamilton v. Kentucky Distilleries & Warehouse Co.
HAMILTON, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE-FOR THE COLLECTION DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY, v. KENTUCKY DISTILLERIES & WAREHOUSE COMPANY. DRYFOOS ET AL. v. EDWARDS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE FOR THE SECOND COLLECTION DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL P
Bone v. Commissioners
BONE v. COMMISSIONERS OF MARION COUNTY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 63. Argued November 11, 1919. — Decided December 15, 1919. Patent No. 705,732, (claims 1, 3, 5, 16 and 17,) to Frank A. Bone, fo
United States v. Board of County Commissioners
UNITED STATES v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF OSAGE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. . No. 309. Argued April 16, 1919. — Decided December 15, 1919. As the guardian of non-compete
Briggs v. Union Pacific Railroad
No. 116. Sarah J. Briggs, Administratrix, etc., v. Union Pacific Railroad Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Submitted November 20, 1919. Decided December 8, 1919.
New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. United States
NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF "CLAIMS. No. 74. Argued May 2, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. Semble, that under Rev. Stats., § 4002, as amended, the Postmaster General may fix t
Peters v. Veasey
PETERS ET AL. v. VEASEY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF VEASEY. error to the supreme court of the state of LOUISIANA. No. 77. Argued November 14, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. Prior to the Act of October 6,1917, c. 97, 40 Stat. 395, amending Jud. Co
Evans v. National Bank
EVANS, SOLE SURVIVING RECEIVER OF THE CITIZENS & SCREVEN COUNTY BANK, v. NATIONAL BANK OF SAVANNAH. certiorari to the court of appeals op the state OF GEORGIA. No. 67. Argued November 11, 12, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. Whether a tran
Oklahoma Railway Co. v. Severns Paving Co.
OKLAHOMA RAILWAY COMPANY v. SEVERNS PAVING COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO-THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OKLAHOMA. No. 106. Argued November 19, 20, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. A decree of a state court directing an assessment of land to p
Wagner v. City of Covington
WAGNER ET AL., PARTNERS, DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF W. T. WAGNER’S SONS, v. CITY OF COVINGTON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 61. Argued November 10, 11, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. Where a manufactu
Corsicana National Bank v. Johnson
CORSICANA NATIONAL BANK OF CORSICANA v. JOHNSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 23. Argued January 16, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. A loan made by a national bank to two persons jointly, or in form one
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Williams
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. WILLIAMS ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 66. Argued'November 11, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. A railroad company in defense of an action for penalti
Bragg v. Weaver
BRAGG v. WEAVER ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 22. Argued October 13, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. The necessity or expediency of taking property for public use are legislative questions upon
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Cole
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. COLE, ADMINISTRATRIX OF ROBERTS, ETC. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 290. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 17, 1919.— Decided December 8, 1919. • The
Liverpool, Brazil & River Plate Steam Navigation Co. v. Brooklyn Eastern District Terminal
LIVERPOOL, BRAZIL & RIVER PLATE STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY v. BROOKLYN EASTERN DISTRICT TERMINAL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 81. Argued November 14, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. A steam tug, pr
Ervien v. United States
ERVIEN, COMMISSIONER OF PUBLIC LANDS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 72. Submitted November 11, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. The Enabling Act of June 20
City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES ET AL. v. LOS ANGELES GAS & ELECTRIC CORPORATION. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 50. Argued October 23, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. A distinction is
Postal Telegraph-Cable Co. v. Warren-Godwin Lumber Co.
POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY v. WARREN-GODWIN LUMBER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE' STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 91. Argued November 17, 1919. — Decided December 8, 1919. Under the Act of June 18, 1910, c. 309, 36 Stat. 539
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Police Court
PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY v. POLICE COURT OF THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 31. Submitted October 9, 1919. — Decided
Southern Pacific Co. v. D'Utassy
No. 334. Southern Pacific Company v. Leo L. D’Utassy. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Motion to dismiss submitted November 17, 1919. Decided November 24, 1919.
Stroud v. United States
STROUD v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 276. Argued October 22, 1919. Decided November 24, 1919. A verdict of guilty as charged'in the indictment, under an indictment chargin
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.