Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1919 Cases
301 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Barrett v. Virginian Railway Co.
BARRETT v. VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 275. Submitted March 21,1919. Decided June 9, 1919. The right to take a voluntary nonsuit, is substantial, and when and how it may
Erie Railroad v. Shuart
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. SHUART ET AL., DOING BUSINESS UNDER THE NAME OF JOHN R. SHUART & SONS. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 342. Submitted April 25, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. In a contract governing an in
American Manufacturing Co. v. City of St. Louis
AMERICAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CITY OF ST. LOUIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 365. Argued April 30, 1919. Decided June 9,1919. The question whether a state law or tax deprives á party of constitutional rights
Hancock v. City of Muskogee
HANCOCK ET AL. v. CITY OF MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 360. Submitted April 30, 1919. Decided June. 9, 1919. Due process of law does not require that the owners of property to be assess
Arizona Employers' Liability Cases
ARIZONA EMPLOYERS’ LIABILITY CASES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA AND TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA. Nos. 20, 21, 232, 332, 334. Argued January 25, 28, 1918; April 24, 25, 1919.
City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.
CITY OF PAWHUSKA v. PAWHUSKA OIL & GAS COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA. No. 281. Argued March 25, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. As respects grants to municipalities of governmental authority — and such is th
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. McComas
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. McCOMAS. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OREGON. No. 172. Argued January 22, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. Lands constituting parts of odd-numbered sections within the primary limits
T. H. Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.
T. H. SYMINGTON COMPANY v. NATIONAL MALLEABLE CASTINGS COMPANY ET AL. MINER v. T. H. SYMINGTON COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the FIRST CIRCUIT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT jOF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. N
DeGanay v. Lederer
DeGANAY v. LEDERER, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 319. Argued April 23, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. Stocks and bonds issued by domestic corporations, and mortgages se
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Minds
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MINDS, SURVIVING AND LIQUIDATING PARTNER OF MINDS ET AL., LATELY TRADING AS BULAH COAL COMPANY. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MINDS ET AL., TRADING AS BULAH COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APP
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUir COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COU
Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson
COMMERCIAL CABLE COMPANY v. BURLESON ET AL. COMMERCIAL PACIFIC CABLE COMPANY v. BURLESON ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 815, 816. Argued March 7, 1919. Decided June 9,
F. Vitelli & Son v. United States
F. VITELLI & SON v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OP CUSTOMS APPEALS. Nos. 67, 68. Argued April 24, 1919. Decided June 9, 1919. The Act of June 22, 1874, 18 Stat. 190, § 21, provides that whenever duties have been liq
Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Butte & Superior Mining Co.
MINERALS SEPARATION, LIMITED, ET AL. v. BUTTE & SUPERIOR MINING COMPANY, DESIGNATED AS BUTTE & SUPERIOR COPPER COMPANY, LIMITED. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 599. Argued March 19, 1919. Decided June
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Puget Sound & Willapa Harbor Railway Co.
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. PUGET SOUND & WILLAPA HARBOR RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 327. Argued April 28, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. A railroad company by constructing its roa
United States v. Babcock
UNITED STATES v. BABCOCK. UNITED STATES v. HAYDEN. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. Nos. 708, 915. Argued April 15, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. The Act of March 3,1885, c. 335, 23 Stat. 350, authorizing payment, after examination and deter
Benedict v. City of New York
BENEDICT v. CITY OF NEW YORK APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 315. Argued April 22, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. A suit against a city to enforce, as upon an express trust, an accounting of an improvement
Camp v. Gress
CAMP ET AL. v. GRESS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP . APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 279. Argued . March 24, 25, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. Under § 51 of the Judicial Code (Act of 1887-1888, § 1), when an action for damáges is br
United States v. Colgate & Co.
UNITED STATES v. COLGATE & COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VIRGINIA. No. 828. Argued March 10, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. On a writ of error under the Criminal Appeals Act, this court m
Williams v. Vreeland
WILLIAMS, AS RECEIVER OF THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BAYONNE, NEW JERSEY, v. VREELAND. ERROR to the circuit court of appeals for the third CIRCUIT. No. 318. Submitted April 23, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. Where both parties without more requ
Washington Post Co. v. Chaloner
WASHINGTON POST COMPANY v. CHALONER. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 316. Argued April 22, 23, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. A news statement that C shot and killed G while G was abusing his wife who had ta
Rumely v. McCarthy
RUMELY v. McCARTHY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 874. Submitted April 16, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. Unde
Blair v. United States
BLAIR v. UNITED STATES. TEMPLETON v. UNITED STATES. PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES. BLAIR v. UNITED STATES ET AL. TEMPLETON v. UNITED STATES ET AL. PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHER
The Scow "6-S."
THE SCOW “6-S.” APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 301. Argued April 24, 1919. Decided June 2, 1919. The Act of June 29, 1888, c. 496,25 Stat. 209, as. amended, regulating dumping
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.