Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1920 Cases
281 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Spitzer v. Board of Trustees
No. 637. Adelbert L. Spitzer et al., as Spitzer-Rorick & Company v. Board of Trustees for the Regina Public School District No. 4 of Saskatchewan.
Casey v. Eikland
No. 615. W. W. Casey et al. v. A. Eikland et al.
United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
No. 1. United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad Company et al.
Marshall v. New York
MARSHALL, AS RECEIVER OF ALL PACKAGE GROCERY STORES COMPANY, v. PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 294. Submitted October 12, 1920. Decided December 20, 1920. 1. At common
Arndstein v. McCarthy
ARNDSTEIN v. McCARTHY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 575. Petition of trustee in bankruptcy for leave to intervene, for certification of the entire record, and for reargument, submitted November 22, 1920.
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. C. L. Merrick Co.
MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY v. C. L. MERRICK COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, . OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 15. Argued January 29, 1920. Decided December 20, 1920. A decree of
Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Washburn Lignite Coal Co.
MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL & SAULT STE. MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY v. WASHBURN LIGNITE COAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT, SIXTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 55. Argued January 29, 1920. Decided December 20, 1920. A jud
Thornton v. Duffy
THORNTON ET AL. v. DUFFY ET AL., MEMBERS OF AND COMPOSING THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 76. Argued November 8, 1920. Decided December 20, 1920. 1. The construction placed on the cons
Bryne v. Martell
No. 402. Willard B. Bryne v. Helen F. Martell, Administratrix, etc.
Lasiter v. Ferguson
No. 589. Fred Lasiter, Administrator, etc. v. Walter Ferguson.
Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. McGinn
No. 617. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company v. J. B. McGinn.
Lamar v. United States
No. 140. David Lamar et al. v. United States.
Calveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Woodbury
GALVESTON, HARRISBURG & SAN ANTONIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. WOODBURY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CIVIL' APPEALS, EIGHTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 100. Submitted November 15, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920. 1. T
Vallely v. Northern Fire & Marine Insurance
VALLELY, AS TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF NORTHERN FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, v. NORTHERN FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ■ EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 96. Submitted November 17, 1920. Decided
United States ex rel. Hall v. Payne
UNITED STATES ON THE RELATION OF HALL v. PAYNE, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 95. Argued November 17, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920. Whether a homestead right can be initiated by
Gilbert v. Minnesota
GILBERT v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 79. Argued November 10, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920. . 1. The law of Minnesota declaring it a misdemeanor for any person to teach or advocate by an
Walls v. Midland Carbon Co.
WALLS, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WYOMING, ET AL. v. MIDLAND CARBON COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT CÓURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WYOMING. No. 219. Argued October 13, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920. 1. As app
United States v. Wheeler
UNITED STATES v. WHEELER ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No. 68. Argued April 28, 1920. Decided December 13, 1920. 1. 'In all the States, from the beginning down to the' establishment of
Wunder v. United States
No. 197. Louis Wunder v. United States.
Oklahoma v. Texas
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS, UNITED STATES, INTERVENER. IN EQUITY. No. 23. Original. Motion for order on receiver submitted November 15, 1920. Order entered December 6, 1920. Order directing receiver to return certain lands, etc. Up
Haupt v. United States
HAUPT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 85. Argued November 10, 1920. Decided December 6, 1920. Appellant sued to recover a large som of money for the use which Le claimed the Government had made’ óf his patented improv
United States v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
UNITED STATES v. LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 1. Argued October 12, 13, 1916; restored to docket for reargument May 21, 1917; reargued N
United States v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.' No. 88. Argued November 11, 12, 1920. Decided December 6, 1920. The requirement' of the Safety Appliance Acts that all tr
Ana Maria Sugar Co. v. Quinones
ANA MARIA SUGAR COMPANY, INC., v. QUINONES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 54. Argued October 21, 1920. Decided December 6, 1920. 1. The rule that errors in rulings of law committed in a trial court ca
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.