Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1920 Cases
281 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain
UNDERWOOD TYPEWRITER COMPANY v. CHAMBERLAIN, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP THE STATE OP CONNECTICUT. No. 215. Argued October 13, 14, 1920. — Decided November 15, 1920. 1. A state tax upon the proporti
Harris v. Bell
HARRIS, FORMERLY FRANCIS, ET AL. v. BELL ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 51. Argued January 26,1920. Decided November 15, 1920. 1. Lands representing the distributive share of a Creek Indian who d
Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. Johnson
NORTHWESTERN MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. JOHNSON. NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MONTPELIER, VERMONT, v. MILLER, ADMINISTRATOR OF JOHNSON. CERTIFICATES FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 70, 71. Submitte
Tachin v. New Jersey
No. 220. Tony Tachin et al. v. State of New Jersey.
Chichagoff Mining Co. v. Tuppela
No. 568. Chichagoff Mining Company v. John Tuppela.
Leman v. Eastman
No. 306. Sheldon Dole Leman et al., Excutors, etc. v. Sidney C. Eastman, Trustee, etc., et al.
Midland Linseed Co. v. American Liquid Fireproofing Co.
No. 60. Midland Linseed Company v. American Liquid Fireproofing Company et al.
Street v. Lincoln Safe Deposit Co.
STREET v. LINCOLN SAFE DEPOSIT COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM-THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW TORE. No. 278. Argued April 26, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. The owner of intoxicating liquors, lawfully a
Wells Bros. v. United States
WELLS BROTHERS COMPANY OF NEW YORK v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 75. Submitted April 30, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Where a contract for the construction of a public building, giving the United States a broad p
Niles-Bement-Pond Co. v. Iron Moulders Union Local No. 68
NILES-BEMENT-POND COMPANY v. IRON MOULDERS UNION LOCAL NO. 68 ET AL. APPEAL FROM AND CERTIORARI. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 69. Argued October 22, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920.- In a suit by a corporation,
United States v. National Surety Co.
UNITED STATES v. NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO . THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE. EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 271, 272. Submitted October 13, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Revised Statutes, § 3468, which gives a surety, who pays to
Arndstein v. McCarthy
ARNDSTEIN v. McCARTHY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 575. Argued October 21, 22, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. U
Turner v. Wade
TURNER ET AL., EXECUTORS OF MORTON, v. WADE, SHERIFF OF BROOKS COUNTY, GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 29. Argued' November 14, 1919; restored to docket for reargument January 5,1920; reargued October 11,192
Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. v. United States
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP VIRGINIA. No. 27. Argued October 8, 11, 1920. — Decided November 8, 1920. A diserimmatioii betw
Johnson v. Maryland
JOHNSON v. STATE OF MARYLAND. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP FREDERICK COUNTY, STATE OP MARYLAND.* No. 289. Argued October 18, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. A law of a State penalizing those who operate motor trucks on highways without hav
New York ex rel. Troy Union Railroad v. Mealy
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ON THE RELATION OF THE TROY UNION RAILROAD COMPANY v. MEALY ET AL., AS ASSESSORS, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 63. Submitted October 21, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. In d
Pryor v. Williams
PRYOR ET AL., RECEIVERS OF THE WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY, v. WILLIAMS. certiorari to the supreme court of the state of MISSOURI. No. 26. Argued October 8, 1920. Decided November 8,1920. . Assumption of risk’is a bar to the action, in a case g
United States v. Butt
UNITED STATES v. BUTT, ALIAS WONG SING. ERROR to the district court of the united states for . THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 275. Submitted October 18, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. An indictment for unlawfully bringing Chinese
New York Scaffolding Co. v. Chain Belt Co.
NEW YORK SCAFFOLDING COMPANY v. CHAIN BELT COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTE CIRCUIT. No. 23. Argued October 7, 8, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. Patent No. 959,008, claims 1 and 3, to Elias H. Hende
New York Scaffolding Co. v. Liebel-Binney Construction Co.
NEW YORK SCAFFOLDING COMPANY v. LIEBEL-BINNEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court op appeals por the THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued October 7, 8, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. The court notices the earlier forms of scaffo
Heald v. District of Columbia
HEALD ET AL., COMMITTEE OF THE PERSON AND ESTATE OF PETERS, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 300. Argued October 18, 1920. Decided November 8, 1920. The Court of Appeals of the
Prentiss v. Eisner
No. 569. Elizabeth S. Prentiss v. Mark Eisner, Collector of Internal Revenue, etc.
Southern Railway Co. v. Miller
No. 561. Southern Railway Company v. Alma R. Miller, Administratrix, etc.
Hamilton v. United States
No. 565. E. Hamilton et al. v. United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.