Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Southern Express Co. v. Terry Packing Co.
No. 123. Southern Express Company v. Terry Packing Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. Argued November 24, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. Mr. J. Nelson Frierson, with whom Mr. Douglas McKay was on the brief
United States v. Bancroft
No. 151. United States v. Arthur John Bancroft. Appeal from the Court of Claims. Argued December 5, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. Mr. George A. King, with whom Mr. William B. King and Mr. George R. Shields were on the brief, for appellee
Cox v. Hart
COX v. HART. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT; No. 71. Argued November 16, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. 1. What will constitute possession of a tract of land depends largely upon its character and condition
Kirby v. United States
KIRBY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CROW TRIBE OF INDIANS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 126. Argued November 27, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. A lease .of Indian land for cattle gra
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon
PENNSYLVANIA COAL COMPANY v. MAHON ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 549. Argued November 14, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. 1. One consideration in deciding whether limitations on private property, to be
Regal Drug Corp. v. Wardell
REGAL DRUG CORPORATION v. WARDELL, UNITED STATES COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE OF THE FIRST DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 108. Submitted November 28, 1922. Decided December 11,
United States v. Lanza
UNITED STATES v. LANZA ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP WASHINGTON. No. 39. Argued November 23, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. 1. The second section of the Eighteenth Amendment, declaring
Champlain Realty Co. v. Town of Brattleboro
CHAMPLAIN REALTY COMPANY v. TOWN OF BRATTLEBORO. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF VERMONT. No. 128. Argued November 27, 28, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. Logs, under control of their owner, which are being floated in a riv
American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.
AMERICAN MILLS COMPANY v. AMERICAN SURETY COMPANY OF NEW YORK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 118. Argued November 24, 1922. Decided December 11, 1922. 1. In a suit to cancel a written guaranty for fr
Mittle v. South Carolina
No. 674. Edward N. Mittle v. State of South Carolina. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of South Carolina. Motion to dismiss submitted November 27, 1922. Decided December 4, 1922. Mr. Charles A. Douglas, Mr. Hugh H. Obear and Mr. Cole
Board of Trade v. Clyne
No. 701. Board of Trade of the City of Chicago et al. v. Charles F. Clyne, United States District Attorney, etc., et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois. Motion to advance and for or
McKelvey v. United States
McKELVEY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 106. Argued November 21, 1922. Decided December 4, 1922. 1. An indictment founded on a general statutory provision defining the offensé
Davis v. Green
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, AND AGENT UNDER SECTION 206 OF TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1920, v. GREEN, ADMINISTRATRIX OF GREEN. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 132. Argued November 28, 1922. Decided Dece
St. Louis Cotton Compress Co. v. Arkansas
ST. LOUIS COTTON COMPRESS COMPANY v. STATE OF ARKANSAS. ERROR TO TIIE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 120, Argued November 23, 24, 1922. Decided December 4, 1922. 1. In determining the constitutionality of a pecuniary exaction m
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Kinney
NEW YORK CENTRAL & HUDSON RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY v. KINNEY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 110. Argued November 21, 1922. Decided December 4, 1922. Where a complaint in an action for personal injuries alleges
Portsmouth Harbor Land & Hotel Co. v. United States
PORTSMOUTH HARBOR LAND & HOTEL COMPANY ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 97. Argued November 15, 1922. Decided December 4, 1922. 1. The petition alleged that the United States, after having several times in the p
United States v. Northeastern Construction Co.
UNITED STATES v. NORTHEASTERN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 122. Argued November 24, 1922. Decided December 4, 1922. Decided on the authority of United States v. Mason & Hanger Co., ante, 323. 56 Ct. Clms. 492,
United States v. Mason & Hanger Co.
UNITED STATES v. MASON & HANGER COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 121. Argued November 24, 1922. Decided December 4, 1922. A building contract, made through the War Department, provided that the contractor should be reimbursed f
Southern Railway Co. v. Clift
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CLIFT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 107. Argued November 21, 1922 Decided December 4, 1922. 1. A law.declaring that “either party” may file a petition ior rehearing within a stated time
City of Boston v. Jackson
CITY OF BOSTON v. JACKSON, TREASURER AND RECEIVER GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL. .ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE STATE OP MASSACHUSETTS. No. 141. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 13, 1922. Dec
Robinson v. Illinois
No. 289. Elbert R. Robinson v. People of the State of Illinois. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. November 27, 1922. Mr. Andrew Jackson for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendant in error.
Armour & Co. v. Louisville Provision Co.
No. 695. Armour & Company v. Louisville Provision Company. November 27, 1922. Mr. George P. Fisher and Mr. Helm, Bruce -for petitioner. Mr. Edward P. Humphrey, Mr. Alexander P. Humphrey and Mr. William W. Crawford for respondent.
Abeles v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
No. 630. Robert Abeles et al. v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Company et al. November 27, 1922. Mr. Paul D. Cra-vath, Mr. Perry D. Trafford, Mr. Robert H. "Neilson and Mr. Carl A. de Gersdorff for respondents.’ Mr. Jesse W. B
Davis v. Wechsler
No. 692. James C. Davis, Director General of Railroads, etc., v. Samuel Wechsler. November 27, 1922. Mr. O. H. Dean, Mr. H. M. Langworthy and Mr. Boy B. Thomson for petitioner. Mr. William S. Hogsett, Mr. Murat Boyle and Mr. Mont T. Prewitt
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.