Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1922 Cases
268 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Heitler v. United States
No. 185. No. 186. No. 187. No. 188. No. 189. Michael Heitler v. United States; Nathaniel Perlman v. United States; Mandel Greenberg v. United States; Frank McCann v. United States; and George F. Quinn v. United States. Error to the District
United States v. Oregon Lumber Co.
UNITED STATES v. OREGON LUMBER COMPANY ET AL. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 40. Argued October 9, 1922. Decided November 27, 1922. Where the Government sued to annul land patents upon the ground of
General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.
GENERAL INVESTMENT COMPANY v. LAKE SHORE & MICHIGAN SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 34. Argued October 6, 1922. Decided November 27, 1922. 1. A motion by a defendant to qua
Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.
HEISLER v. THOMAS COLLIERY COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF' THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 541. Argued November 14, 15, 1922. Decided November 27, 1922. 1. In view of the differences: between anthracite and bituminous coals in
Liberty Oil Co. v. Condon National Bank
LIBERTY OIL COMPANY v. CONDON NATIONAL BANK ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ' . EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 98. Argued November.15, 16, 1922. Decided November 27, 1922. 1. Where a defendant, sued- at law in the District Co
Jones v. Taylor
No. 689. John Hall Jones et al. v. Ellen H. Phinney Taylor. November 20, 1922. Mr. Robert G. Dodge and Mr. Harold S. Davis for petitioners. ■ Mr. Roland Gray for respondent.
Feigin v. United States
No. 649. Joseph Feigin v. United States. November 20, 1922. Mr. Charles T. Hughes. for petitioner. Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Assistant Attorney General, for the United States.
Arenz v. Astoria Savings Bank
No. 636. Theodore Arenz, Bankrupt, v. Astoria Savings Bank. November 20, 1922. Mr. Alfred A. Hampson for petitioner. No appearance for respondent. .
Moore v. Georgia
No. 133. Bill Moore v. State of Georgia. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Georgia. Argued November 14, 1922. Decided November 20, 1922. Mr. Max Isaac for plaintiff in error. Mr. George M. Napier, for defendant in error, submitted.
Kline v. Burke Construction Co.
KLINE ET AL., AS THE BOARD OF IMPROVEMENT OF PAVING IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 20, OF THE CITY OF TEXARKANA, ARKANSAS, v. BURKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 81. Argued October 19
United States v. Atkins
UNITED STATES v. MINNIE ATKINS ET AL. NANCY ATKINS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES, MINNIE FOLK, NÉE ATKINS, ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 45, 46. Argued October 11, 12, 1922. Decided November 20, 192
Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Louisiana Public Service Commission
CUMBERLAND TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 650. Argued on return to rulo to show cause why supersedea
United States v. Milanese
No. 140. United States v. Charles Milanese. Error, to the District Court of the United States for the Southern- District of New I’ork. November 13, 1922. No appearance for defendant in errpf.
United States v. Lippmann
No. 578. United States v. Lippmann, Spier & Hahn. November 13, 1922. Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. William C. Herron for the United States. Mr. George J. Puckhafer for respondent. [See post, 742.]
Trusts & Guarantee Co. v. Hoosier Veneer Co.
No. 631. Trusts & Guarantee Company, Limited, Executor, etc., v. Hoosier Veneer Company. November 13, 1922. Mr. George T. Buckingham and Mr. Marquis Eaton for petitioner. Mr. H. P. Young for respondent.
American Merchant Marine Insurance v. Liberty Sand & Gravel Co.
No. 609. American Merchant Marine Insurance Company of New York v. Liberty Sand & Gravel Company, Inc. November 13, 1922. Mr. T. Catesby Jones, Mr. D. Roger Englar and Mr. James D. Carpenter for petitioner. Mr,’Robert S. Erskine for respond
Harden v. Rodriguez
No. 599. Fred M. Harden v. Manuel Arias Rodriguez et al. November 13, 1922. Mr. Clement L. Bouvé for petitioner. Mr'. Alexander Britton and Mr. Lawrence H. Cake for respondents.
Bacon Brothers Co. v. Grable
No. 586. Bacon Brothers Company v. E. Frank Grable, Individually, etc. November 13, 1922. Mr. George D. Welles and Mr. Thomas H. Tracy fair petitioner. Mr. George E. Brand, Mr. Harold W. Fraser and Mr. U. S. 'Bratton for respondent.
Grossman v. United States
No. 559. Samuel M. Grossman v. United States. November 13, 1922. Mr. Benjamin C. Bachrach and Mr. David D. Starisbury for petitioner. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. Robert P. Reeder and Mr. W. Marvin Smith for the .United States. .
Standard Oil Co. v. Henry
No. 544. Standard Oil Company (Indiana) v. James R. Henry. November 13, 1922. Mr. Samuel D. Miller, Mr. Frank C. Dailey, Mr. William H. Thompson and Mr. C. C. LeForgee for petitioner. Mr. Edward M. White for respondent.
Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.
No. 589. Thomson Spot Welder Company v. Ford Motor Company. November 13, 1922. Mr. Frederick P. Fish for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.-
Davis v. Portland Seed Co.
No. 573. James C. Davis, as Agent, etc., v. Portland Seed Company. November 13, 1922. Mr. Arthur C. Spencer, Mr. Charles E. Cochran and Mr. John F. Finerty for petitioner. Mr. James G. Wilson for respondent.
United States v. Sischo
No. 76. United States v. Wesley L. Sischo. On writ .of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. November 13, 1922. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Assistant Attorney General, and Mr. John
Southern Pacific Co. v. Olympian Dredging Co.
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY Et AL. v. OLYMPIAN DREDGING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 78. Argued October 19, 1922. Decided November 13, 1922. 1. By the Act of September 19, 1890, c. 907, 26 Stat
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.