Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Salkovich ex rel. Unkovich v. Industrial Accident Commission of California
No. 595. Fata Salkovich, by Kosto Unkovich, Attorney in Fact, v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California. December 10, 1923. Mr. William M. Williams for petitioner. Mr. Warren H. Pillsbury for-respondent.
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Chinn
No. 390. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Company v. Eva Chinn et al. December 10, 1923. Mr. O. W. Dynes and Mr. H. H. Field for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Australia v. McLean
No. 623. Commonwealth of Australia et al. v. John L. McLean, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc. December 10, 1923. Mr. Corwin S. Shank for petitioners. Mr. Ira Bronson and Mr. H. B. Jones for respondent.
Salinger v. Loisel
Nos. 341 and 342. B. I. Salinger, Jr. v. Victor Loisel, U. S. Marshal, etc. Appeal from the'District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Order entered December 10, 1923.
United States v. California Midway Oil Co.
No. 62. United States v. California Midway Oil Company et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals -for the Ninth Circuit. Argued December 3, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. Mr. H. L. Underwood, Special Assistant to the Attorney Genera
Arnold v. United States ex rel. W. B. Guimarin & Co.
ARNOLD, DOING BUSINESS AS R. H. ARNOLD COMPANY, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES FOR THE USE OF W. B. GUIMARIN & COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 31. Argued February 27, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. A ju
Cudahy Packing Co. v. Parramore
CUDAHY PACKING COMPANY OF NEBRASKA v. PARRAMORE, AS WIDOW AND GUARDIAN, ETC., ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP UTAH. No. 107. Argued November 14, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. 1. Agreeably to the principles sustaining st
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
ROOKER ET AL. v. FIDELITY TRUST COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 295. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 26, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. 1. Where a judgment
National Ass'n of Window Glass Manufacturers v. United States
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WINDOW GLASS MANUFACTURERS ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 353. Argued November 22, 23, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. 1. Whether
Diaz v. Patterson
DOMINGO DIAZ A., ET AL. v. PATTERSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS' FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 113. Argued November 28, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. 1. Owners of a registered title to land in the Canal Zone who are in posses
Lehmann v. State Board of Public Accountancy
LEHMANN v. STATE BOARD OF PUBLIC ACCOUNTANCY ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ALABAMA. No. 170. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted November 26, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. A state statute authorizing a board to gran
Ex parte United States
EX PARTE IN THE MATTER OF THE UNITED STATES, AS OWNER OF NINETEEN BARGES AND FOUR TOWBOATS, PETITIONER. PETITION POR A WRIT OF PROHIBITION. No. 23, Original. Argued on return to rule to show cause November 19, 20, 1923. Decided December 10,
North Dakota v. Minessota
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA v. STATE OF MINNESOTA. IN EQUITY. No. 10, Original. Argued January 3, 4, 1921; restored to docket and ordered that supplemental proofs be taken, April 18, 1921; Argued March 12, 13, 1923. Decided December 10, 1923. 1.
Heintz v. United States
No. 599. No. 600. No. 601. No. 602. Joseph G. Heintz v. United States; Max Smithberger v. United States; Joliet Citizens’ Brewing Company v. United States; and Oscar Weinbrod v. United States. December 3, 1923. Mr. Frank J: J ones and Mr. T
King County v. Seattle School District No. 1
KING COUNTY, WASHINGTON, v. SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS. FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 30. Argued April 13, 1923. Decided December 3, 1923. 1. A suit is withm the jurisdiction of the District Court a
Hightower v. American National Bank of Macon
HIGHTOWER ET AL. v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK OF MACON, GEORGIA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF; APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 25. Argued January 25, 1923. Decided December 3, 1923. 1. A contract between two national banks under which t
Pennsylvania v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. STATE OF OHIO v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. OUT REHEARING. Nos. 15 and 16, Orig., October Term, 1922. Reargued November 20, 1923. Decided December 3, 1923. Decree heretofore made in these
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 15, Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, United States, intervener. Submitted November 19, 1923. Decided November 26, 1923. Mr. Cordenio A. Severance and Mr.,. Edward P. Keech, Jr., for petitioner. Mr. Solicitor Geni eral Beck
Brosnan v. Brosnan
BROSNAN, JR., ET AL. v. BROSNAN. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 56. Argued October 8, 1923. Decided November 26, 1923. In the District of Columbia, under a caveat to a will, whether filed before or
Clallam County v. United States
CLALLAM COUNTY, WASHINGTON, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES AND UNITED STATES SPRUCE PRODUCTION CORPORATION. ON CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 255. Argued November 15, 1923. Decided November 26, 1923. 1. A
Street v. Shipowners' Ass'n of the Pacific Coast
STREET, SUING ON BEHALF OF HIMSELF AND ALL OTHER SEAMEN ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE AND FOREIGN COMMERCE BY SEA, ETC. v. SHIPOWNERS’ ASSOCIATION OF THE PACIFIC COAST ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DIST
United States v. Wood
No. 314. United States v. Roger B. Wood, Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 22, 1923. Decided November 19, 1923. Mr. Godfrey Goldmark, f
Frick v. Webb
FRICK ET AL. v. WEBB, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES ' FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.' No. 111. Argued April 23, 24, 1923. Decided November 19, 1923. Section
Webb v. O'Brien
WEBB, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. v. O’BRIEN ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED '.STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 26. Argued April 23, 24, 1923. Decided November 19, 1923. 1. A ci
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.