Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1923 Cases
351 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.
HEYER, DOING BUSINESS AS T. A. HEYER DUPLICATOR COMPANY, v. DUPLICATOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 75. Argued October 15, 16, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. The sale, by t
New Orleans Land Co. v. Brott
NEW ORLEANS LAND COMPANY v. BROTT ET AL. BROTT ET AL. v. NEW ORLEANS LAND COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 64 and 86. Argued October 10, 11, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. 1. The act of state officials i
United States v. Slaymaker
UNITED STATES v. SLAYMAKER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 87. Argued October 18, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. The provision of the Act of August 29, 1916, that when any member of the Naval Reserve Force severs his connection with
Schwab v. Richardson
SCHWAB v. RICHARDSON, AS TREASURER OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 81. Submitted October 15, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. 1. A State may tax the franchise of a corporation of its ow
Brown v. United States
BROWN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. BROWN ET AL. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OP IDAHO. Nos. 97 and 98. Argued October 19, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. 1. Where establishment of a reservo
Myers v. International Trust Co.
MYERS ET AL., COPARTNERS AS S. A. & H. MYERS, v. INTERNATIONAL TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OP SUFFOLK, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 89. Argued October 18, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. A judgment in bank
Woodbridge v. United States
WOODBRIDGE ET AL., EXECUTORS OF WOODBRIDGE, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 51. Argued October 5, 8, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. 1. Any practice of an inventor and applicant for patent through which he, deliberat
McConaughey v. Morrow
McCONAUGHEY, FOR HIMSELF AND OTHERS, EMPLOYEES OF THE PANAMA CANAL AND OF THE PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY, v. MORROW, GOVERNOR OF THE PANAMA CANAL, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 48. Submitted October
Denby v. Berry
DENBY, SECRETARY OF THE NAVY OF THE UNITED STATES, v. BERRY. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP • COLUMBIA. No. 47. Argued October 5, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. 1. The act establishing the Naval Reserve Force, (August 29
Director General of Railroads v. Kastenbaum
DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS v. KASTENBAUM. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 39. Argued October 3, 4, 1923. Decided November 12, 1923. Under § 10 of the Federal Control Act, an action for false imprisonment may
Stephenson v. Kratke
No. 614. Homer I. Stephenson v. Frank Kratke, Warden of the Common Jail of the City and County of Denver. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Colorado. October 22, 1923. No appearance for appellant.
Rumely v. United States
No. 579. Edward A. Rumely et al. v. United States. October 22, 1923. Mr. Walter C. Noyes, Mr. William L. Wemple, Mr. Arthur G. Hays and Mr. Henry B. Johnson for petitioners. Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mr. LeRoy L. Hight for the United S
Kluchinsky v. Zernosky
No. 566. Adam Kluchinsky et al., etc. v. John Zernosky, etc. October 22, 1923. Mr. Roscoe R. Koch for petitioners. Mr. Daniel C. Donoghue and Mr. M. J. Ryan for respondent.
Mitchel v. Manila Railroad
No. 548. Asuncion Mitchel v. Manila Railroad Company. October 22, 1923. Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. F. W. Clements and Mr. L. H. Cake for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.- ■
Mount Vernon Car Manufacturing Co. v. Pressed Steel Manufacturing Co.
No. 536. Mount Vernon Car Manufacturing Company v. Pressed Steel Manufacturing Company et al. October 22, 1923. Mr. Henry Love Clarke for petitioner. Mr. George T. Buckingham and Mr. George L. Wilkinson for respondents.
Dierickx v. Davis
No. 523. Joseph F. Dierickx v. James C. Davis, Federal Agent, etc. October 22, 1923. Mr. David K. Tone for petitioner. Mr. Silas II. Strawn, Mr. J. Walter Dohany, Mr. John D. Black, Mr. John A. Gavit and Mr. Frank E. Robson for respondent
Gates v. Maryland Casualty Co.
No. 510. Sue Phillips Gates v. Maryland Casualty Company. October 22, 1923. Mr. Dallas V. Halverstadt for petitioner. Mr. William C. Prentiss and Mr. Walter L. Clark for respondent.
Meek v. Centre County Banking Co.
No. 590. No. 591. No. 592. George R. Meek v. Centre County Banking Company et al.; Florence F. Dale v. Centre County Banking Company et al., etc.; and Andrew Breeze v. Centre County Banking Company et al. October 22, 1923. Mr. Mortimer C. R
United States v. Ninety-five Barrels
No. 559. United States v. Ninety-five Barrels, more or less, Alleged Apple Cider Vinegar, etc. October 22, 1923. Mr. Solicitor General Beck for petitioner. Mr. John G. White and Mr. Austin V. Cannon for respondent.
Ebert v. Poston
No. 512. Edmund L. Ebert et al. v. Harry P. Poston. October 22, 1923. Mr. P. J. M. Hally for petitioners. Mr. Louis Cohane for respondent.
Walser v. City of Sioux Falls
No. 80. Matt Walser v. City of Sioux Falls. Error to the Municipal Court of the City of Sioux Falls, State of South Dakota. Submitted October 15, 1923. Decided October 22, 1923. Mr. Joe Kirby for plaintiff in error. Mr. Joe H. Kirby and Mr.
Davis v. Wechsler
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, ETC. v. WECHSLER. CERTIORARI TO THE KANSAS CITY COURT OF APPEALS, STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 70. Argued October 12, 1923. Decided October 22, 1923. 1. A decision of a state court denying an objection to jur
American Railway Express Co. v. Levee
AMERICAN RAILWAY EXPRESS COMPANY v. LEVEE. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT, OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 54. Argued October 8, 1923. Decided October 22, 1923. 1. When by the constitution of a State the jurisdiction of its
United States v. Walter
UNITED STATES v. WALTER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE. UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. ' - No. 20. Argued October 3, 1923. Decided October 22, 1923. 1. The Act of October 23, 1918, so amending § 35 oí the Criminal
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.