Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Chicago Junction Case
THE CHICAGO JUNCTION CASE. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 489. Argued January 24, 1924. Decided March 3, 1924. 1. An order of the Interstate Commerce Commission permitting one
Manufacturers' Land & Improvement Co. v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp.
MANUFACTURERS’ LAND & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES SHIPPING BOARD EMERGENCY FLEET CORPORATION AND PUBLIC SERVICE RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 181. Argued January 21, 1924. Decided
Erickson v. United States
ERICKSON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES AND UNITED STATES SPRUCE PRODUCTION CORPORATION. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP WASHINGTON. No. 125. Argued February 20, 1924. Decided March 3, 1924. 1. A suit b
Smith v. Greenebaum
No. 199. C. Henry Smith v. Alfred Greenebaum. February 25, 1924. Dismissed with costs, on authority of counsel for plaintiff in error. Mr. Samuel Knight for plaintiff in error. Mr. William Denman for defendant in error.
Wheeler v. United States
No. 758. Thomas R. Wheeler v. United States. February 25, 1924. Mr. Niel P. Sterne for petitioner. Mr. Solicitor General Beck and Mrs. Mabel Walker Willebrandt, Assistant Attorney General, for the United States.
Steamer "Spokane" v. Steiner
No. 748. Steamer “Spokane”, Her Engines, etc. v. Charles Steiner et al. February 25, 1924. Mr. Ray M. Stanley for petitioner. Mr. Joseph A. Wechter for respondents.
Ex parte DeForest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co.
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of DeForest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Company, Petitioner. Mr. A. Leo Everett and Mr. Samuel E. Darby, Jr., for petitioner. Submitted February 18, 1924. Decided February 25, 1924.
Matthew Addy Co. v. United States
MATTHEW ADDY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. FORD v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 84 and 85. Argued October 17, 18, 1923. Decided February 25, 1924. 1. In a prosecution for violation of an
Washington v. W. C. Dawson & Co.
STATE OF WASHINGTON v. W. C. DAWSON & COMPANY. INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ET AL. v. JAMES ROLPH COMPANY ET AL. ERROR TO SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALI
McLean v. Australia
No. 744. John L. McLean, as Trustee, etc. v. Commonwealth of Australia et al. February 18, 1924. Mr. Ira Bronson and Mr. H. B. Jones for petitioner. Mr. Corwin S. Shank for respondents.
Pennsylvania Railroad v. McDonald
No. 733. Pennsylvania Railroad Company v. Clark T. McDonald. February 18, 1924. Mr. J. H. Goeke for petitioner. Mr. D. J. Cable and Mr. John L. Cable for respondeht.
Yadkin Railroad v. Sigmon
No. 718. Yadkin Railroad Company et al. v. Ada Sigmon, Administratrix, etc. February 18, 1924. Mr. H. O’B. Cooper, Mr. S. B. Prince, Mr. B. S. Womble and Mr. L. E. Jeffries for petitioners. Mr. T. D. Maness for respondent.
Ex parte Rotax Co.
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the Matter of Rotax Company, Inc., Petitioner. Submitted January 28, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. Mr. Frederick P. Warfield, Mr. Holland S. Duell and Mr. Leonard A. Watson for petitioner.
Perkins-Campbell Co. v. United States
THE PERKINS-CAMPBELL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 183. Argued January 21, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. Where an award, made under the Dent Act for expenses incurred under a war contract, was accepted
United States v. State Investment Co.
UNITED STATES v. STATE INVESTMENT COMPANY ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 195. Argued January 25, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. The questions where the line run by a survey lies upon the gro
Guaranty Title & Trust Corp. v. United States
GUARANTY TITLE & TRUST CORPORATION, RECEIVER OF VUE DE L'EAU COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 109. Argued November 14, 1923. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. Under the Virginia Code, 1919, § 5805, providing that
Salem Trust Co. v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.
SALEM TRUST COMPANY v. MANUFACTURERS’ FINANCE COMPANY ET AL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 74. Argued October 15, 1923. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. In a suit between citizens of different States to
Jones v. Union Guano Co.
JONES v. UNION GUANO COMPANY, INCORPORATED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 73. Argued October 15, 1923. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. In exercising its right to impose reasonable conditions upon the bringing
Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. Malloy
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND v. MALLOY ET AL., TRADING AS MALLOY BROTHERS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 553. Argued January 9, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. Generally, as held in Exchange Natl.
Raley v. Richardson
J. E. RALEY & BROTHERS, ET AL. v. RICHARDSON, TAX COLLECTOR OF FULTON COUNTY, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 152. Submitted January 11, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. The validity of a flat tax imposed b
Texas Transport & Terminal Co. v. City of New Orleans
TEXAS TRANSPORT & TERMINAL COMPANY, INCORPORATED, v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP LOUISIANA. No. 141. Argued January 4, 7, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. A state license tax cannot be laid upon the busin
Sanguinetti v. United States
SANGUINETTI v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 130. Argued January 3, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. A canal, constructed by the Government to improve navigation, overflowed intermittently, flooding the claimant’s land
Packard v. Banton
PACKARD v. BANTON, AS DISTRICT ATTORNEY IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 126. Argued January 2, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. 1. The
Pierce Oil Corp. v. Hopkins
PIERCE OIL CORPORATION v. HOPKINS, COUNTY CLERK OF SEBASTIAN COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 151. Argued January 11, 1924. Decided February 18, 1924. A state law requiring retail
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.