Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Higgins
No. —, Original. Ex parte: In the matter of William A. Higgins, et al., Petitioners. Submitted April 7, 1924. Decided April 14, 1924. Mr. Mark St ear-man and Mr. Emanuel J. Myers for petitioners. Mr. Wolcott H. Pitkin and Mr. Samuel J. Rose
Jay Burns Baking Co. v. Bryan
JAY BURNS BAKING COMPANY ET AL. v. BRYAN, AS GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. No. 94. Argued October 19, 1923. Decided April 14, 1924. 1. The power of a State to protect the publ
David A. Manville & Co. v. Francis Oil & Refining Co.
No. 851. David A. Manville & Company, Inc. v. Francis Oil & Refining Company. April 7, 1924. Mr. Joseph G. M. Browne for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Cooke v. United States
No. 864. Clay Cooke v. United States. April 7, 1924. Mr. J. A. Temple-ton, Mr. E. C. Brandenburg, Mr. Charles A. Boynton and Mr. E. Howard McCaleb for petitioner. No brief filed for the United States.
Meek v. Centre County Banking Co.
MEEK v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL., BANKRUPTS. DALE v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL., BANKRUPTS. BREEZE v. CENTRE COUNTY BANKING COMPANY ET AL., BANKRUPTS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. N
Sperry Oil & Gas Co. v. Chisholm
SPERRY OIL & GAS COMPANY ET AL. v. CHISHOLM ET AL. APPEAL EROM AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS EOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 164. Argued January 16, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. A final decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals
McCurdy v. United States
McCURDY, COUNTY TREASURER, OSAGE COUNTY, OKLAHOMA, ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 135. Argued January 4, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. Lands in Oklahoma allotted in severalty
Georgia v. City of Chattanooga
STATE OF GEORGIA v. CITY OF CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE. IN EQUITY. No. 21, Original. Argued on motion to dismiss December 3, 1923. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. Land acquired and held for railway purposes by one State within the borders of another
Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co.
WEBSTER ELECTRIC COMPANY v. SPLITDORF ELECTRICAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 93. Argued March 6, 7, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. Upon a review by certiorari, the Court is not called up
E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Davis
E. I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY v. DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, AGENT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 517. Argued March. 14, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. In a complaint showing by apt al
First National Bank of Greeley v. Board of County Commissioners
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF GREELEY v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 180. Argued January 18, 21, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. An action by
United States v. Payne
UNITED STATES v. PAYNE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 240. Argued February 25, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. The United States, as guardian of tribal Indians, is bound to discharge its trust with good
Fook v. White
CHUNG FOOK v. WHITE, AS COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION FOR THE PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 299. Argued February 26, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. The proviso of § 22 of the Immigr
Oliver American Trading Co. v. Government of Mexico
OLIVER AMERICAN TRADING COMPANY, INC. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF MEXICO AND NATIONAL RAILWAYS OF MEXICO. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 662. Argued March 13, 1924. Deci
Nyanza Steamship Co. v. Jahncke Dry Dock No. 1
NYANZA STEAMSHIP COMPANY, LTD. v. JAHNCKE DRY DOCK No. 1, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 307. Argued March 6, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. The rule confining the jurisdi
Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. Fox
TAUBEL-SCOTT-KITZMILLER COMPANY, INC. v. FOX, ET AL., TRUSTEES IN BANKRUPTCY OF COWEN HOSIERY COMPANY, INC., BANKRUPT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 188. Argued January 22, 23, 1924. Decided April 7,
Davis v. Portland Seed Co.
DAVIS, AS AGENT, ETC. v. PORTLAND SEED COMPANY. SAN FRANCISCO & PORTLAND STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. PARRINGTON. DAVIS, AGENT UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION, v. PARRINGTON. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. McCAULL-DINSMORE COMPANY. CERTIOR
Rodman v. Pothier
RODMAN, UNITED STATES MARSHAL, v. POTHIER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 546. Argued March 14, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. Where a person was held for removal under an indictment charging murder on a
Louisiana Public Service Commission v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co.
LOUISIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ET AL. v. MORGAN’S LOUISIANA & TEXAS RAILROAD & STEAMSHIP COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 421. Argued March 5, 6, 1924. Decided Apr
Panama Railroad v. Johnson
PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY v. JOHNSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 369. Argued December 7, 1923. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. As a general rule, where existing legislation on a particular subject has been sys
Dillingham v. McLaughlin
DILLINGHAM, AS PRESIDENT, ET AL. v. McLAUGHLIN, AS SUPERINTENDENT OF BANKS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. McLAUGHLIN, AS SUPERINTEDED OF BANKS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v. DILLINGHAM, AS PRESIDENT, ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT
Prestonettes, Inc. v. Coty
PRESTONETTES, INC. v. COTY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 197. Argued February 18, 19, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. 1. The ownership of a registered trade mark consisting of a name designating the ow
United States v. Gay
UNITED STATES v. GAY. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 205. Argued March 11, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. Section 3 of the Act of March 2, 1907, 34 Stat. 1228, in providing that when any naturalized citizen shall have resided for two ye
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Nichols
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. NICHOLS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 268. Argued February 26, 1924. Decided April 7, 1924. A statute of New Mexico (Anno. Stats., 1915, § 1820) provide
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.