Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
State v. State
STATE OF OKLAHOMA v. STATE OF TEXAS. UNITED STATES, intervener. IN EQUITY. No. 13, Original. Argued November 17, 1924. Decided November 18, 1924 1. A receiver appointed by this Court to conserve and operate private oil wells as an incident
Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of World v. Shelton
No. 623. Sovereign Camp of the Woodmen of the World v. Alice C. Shelton. November 17, 1924. Mr. Rufus S. Day, Mr. Harry J. Gerrity and Mr. Charles H. Bates for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Sovereign Camp Woodmen of World v. O'Neill
SOVEREIGN CAMP WOODMEN OF THE WORLD v. O’NEILL ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 58. Submitted October 9, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. A decree of the District Court di
Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Smith
ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORPORATION v. SMITH ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, No. 64. Argued. October 13, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. Decided upon the authority of Endicott Johnson Corporation v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc.,
Endicott Johnson Corp. v. Encyclopedia Press, Inc.
ENDICOTT JOHNSON CORPORATION v. ENCYCLOPEDIA PRESS, INC. ERROR to the supreme court op the state op new YORK. No. 41. Submitted October 7, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. Due process of law does not require that a judgment debtor, who h
Bass, Ratcliff & Gretton, Ltd. v. State Tax Commission
BASS, RATCLIFF & GRETTON, LIMITED, v. STATE TAX COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 10. Argued April 21, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. The tax imposed on foreign corporations by Art. 9-A of the Tax Law
Gorham Manufacturing Co. v. State Tax Commission
GORHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. STATE TAX COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 5. Argued April 21, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. A t
Ferries Co. v. United States
THE FERRIES COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 46. Argued October 8, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. A ten year lease of ferry property provided that, at its termination, the property leased, including any addit
Miller v. Robertson
MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL. v. ROBERTSON. ROBERTSON v. MILLER, AS ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT Nos. 35 and 145. Argued May 1, 2, 1924. Decided November 17,
United States v. Moser
UNITED STATES v. MOSER. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 99. Argued October 21, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. While the doctrine of res judicata does not apply to unmixed questions of law, a fact or right distinctly adjudged canno
Sunderland v. United States
SUNDERLAND v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 79. Argued October 16, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. The United States is not bound by a decree of a state court, to which it was not a
Silberschein v. United States
SILBERSCHEIN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 66. Argued October 13, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. The War Risk Insurance Act, as amended, commits to the Dire
Savage Arms Corp. v. United States
SAVAGE ARMS CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 13. Argued October 6, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. Claimant, having been requested to suspend operations as to a large number of articles it was manufacturin
Panama Railroad v. Rock
PANAMA RAILROAD COMPANY v. ROCK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE PIPTH CIRCUIT. No. 4. Submitted October 6, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. At common law no private cause of action arises from the death of a human being, a
State ex rel. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co. v. Taylor
STATE OF MISSOURI EX REL. ST. LOUIS, BROWNSVILLE & MEXICO RAILWAY COMPANY v. TAYLOR, JUDGE OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 89. Argued October 17, 1924. D
United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. Pennsylvania Railroad
UNITED STATES AND INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 68. Argued October 13, 14, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924.
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Western Crawford Road Improvement District
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY ET AL. v. WESTERN CRAWFORD ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 67. Submitted October 10, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. Where a special road improvement
Erie Railroad v. Kirkendall
ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY v. KIRKENDALL. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 51. Argued October 8, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. A petition for certiorari must give adequate inform
Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Hanna
MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. HANNA. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 54. Submitted October 8, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. A writ of certiorari to a state court will be dismissed when the record fail
Davis v. Currie
DAVIS, AGENT APPOINTED BY THE PRESIDENT UNDER THE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1920, v. CURRIE. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 60. Argued October 10, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. A writ of certiorari will b
Crouch v. United States
CROUCH, LEGAL GUARDIAN OF KONSTOVICH, WIDOW, v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, TRANSFERRED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 61. Argued Octob
Southern Railway Co. v. City of Durham
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL. v. CITY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 71. Argued October 14, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. The right of jury trial in a state court is determi
House v. Road Improvement District No. 2
HOUSE v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 2, OF CONWAY COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. HOUSE v. ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 5, OF CONWAY COUNTY, ARKANSAS, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. Nos. 92 and 93. Argued October 17
Biddle v. Luvisch
BIDDLE, WARDEN OF THE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY AT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS, v. LUVISCH. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 96. Argued October 21, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. A certificate from the Ci
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.