Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1924 Cases
322 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gonsalves v. Morse Dry Dock & Repair Co.
GONSALVES v. MORSE DRY DOCK & REPAIR COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 3. Argued October 6, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. An action by an employee for personal injuries
Work v. United States ex rel. Lynn
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. UNITED STATES EX REL. LYNN, GUARDIAN OF LASLEY, AN INCOMPETENT OSAGE INDIAN ALLOTTEE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 17. Argued January 16, 17, 1924. Decided November 17, 1
Commonwealth Trust Co. v. Smith
COMMONWEALTH TRUST COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH v. SMITH ET AL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE , NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued February 29, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. On appeal from a decree dismissing a bill because of r
A. W. Duckett & Co. v. United States
A. W. DUCKETT & COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 108. Argued October 23, 24, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. Possession of terminal property, including a pier on which the claimant had a lease from the o
Davis v. Kennedy
DAVIS, AGENT, v. KENNEDY, ADMINISTRATRIX OF KENNEDY, DECEASED. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TENNESSEE. No. 85. Argued October 17, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. Where a railway collision, killing an engineer, was direct
Fernandez v. Ojeda
B. FERNANDEZ & BROS., SUCCESSORS, ET AL. v. AYLLON Y OJEDA, IN HER OWN RIGHT AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM, ETC. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 82. Argued October 16, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. Spe
Mackenzie v. A. Engelhard & Sons Co.
MACKENZIE v. A. ENGELHARD & SONS COMPANY. A. ENGELHARD & SONS COMPANY v. MACKENZIE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 55 and 59. Argued October 9, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. An appeal is a proce
Avent v. United States
AVENT v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 52. Argued October 9, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. Where the constitutional grounds for bringing a case to this Court fro
Mellon v. Orinoco Iron Co.
MELLON, SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL. v. ORINOCO IRON COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 491. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 13, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924
Tod v. Waldman
TOD, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, v. WALDMAN ET AL. CERTIORARI' TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND. CIRCUIT. No. 95. Argued October 20, 21, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. When it is found, in habeas 'corpus, that aliens, re
James Shewan & Sons, Inc. v. United States
JAMES SHEWAN & SONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 42. Argued October 7, 8, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. The Suits in Admiralty Act of 1920, c. 95,
Nassau Smelting & Refining Works, Ltd. v. United States
NASSAU SMELTING & REFINING WORKS, LTD. v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 37. Argued October 7, 1924. Decided November 17, 1924. 1. The question whether- the Distric
Chicago Great Western Railway Co. v. Kendall
CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. KENDALL, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF IOWA, ET AL. CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. KENDALL, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF IOWA, ET AL. APPEALS PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FO
Harrison v. Chamberlain
No. 635. George Harrison, Trustee, etc. v. Anna B. Chamberlain. October 27, 1924. Mr. Samuel A. Mitchell and Mr. Philip Kates for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Southern Oil Corp. v. Yale Natural Gas Co.
No. 90. Southern Oil Corporation v. Yale Natural Gas Company. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Argued October 17, 1924. Decided October 27, 1924. Mr. Henry M. Gray and Mr. Rollin E. Gish, with whom Mr. Randolph Shirk, Mr
Davis v. Henderson
DAVIS, AGENT, v. HENDERSON. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 44. Submitted October 8, 1924. Decided October 27, 1924. 1. A judgment of a state court rendered against an interstate carrier, when under f
Twin Falls Salmon River Land & Water Co. v. Caldwell
TWIN FALLS SALMON RIVER LAND & WATER COMPANY ET AL. v. CALDWELL ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 8. Argued March 3, 1924. Decided October 27, 1924. 1. Where the existence and merits of a controversy
Armour & Co. v. Fort Morgan Steamship Co.
No. 537. Armour & Company v. Fort Morgan Steamship Company, Limited, et al. October 20, 1924. Mr. John D. Grace for petitioner. No appearance for respondents.
Ex parte Cardigan
No. —. Original. Ex parte: In the matter of Frank W. Cardigan, petitioner. October 20, 1924.
Air-Way Electric Appliance Corp. v. Day
AIR-WAY ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CORPORATION v. DAY, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF OHIO, ET AL. DAY, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF OHIO, ET AL. v. AIR-WAY ELECTRIC APPLIANCE CORPORATION. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHE
Michaelson v. United States ex rel. Chicago
MICHAELSON ET AL. v. UNITED STATES EX REL. CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY. SANDEFUR v. CANOE CREEK COAL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT
McCarthy v. Arndstein
McCARTHY, UNITED STATES MARSHAL FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK v. ARNDSTEIN. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 404, October Term, 1922. Petition for rehearing granted Octob
Love v. Griffith
LOVE ET AL. v. GRIFFITH ET AL. ERROR TO THE COURT OP CIVIL APPEALS, FIRST SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT, OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 12. Argued October 6, 1924. Decided October 20, 1924. 1. A party who plainly asserted a federal right in a state
Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of America
No. 435. Independent Wireless Telegraph Company v. Radio Corporation of America. October 13, 1924. Mr. William H. Davis for petitioner. Mr. L. F. H. Betts for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.