Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co.
UNITED STATES v. NEW YORK & CUBA MAIL STEAMSHIP COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 65. Argued October 20, 1925. Decided December 14, 1925. 1. The Act of December -26, 1920, providing, inter alia,
Ex parte Gruber
EX PARTE GRUBER. No. —. Original. Motion for leave to file petition for mandamus, November 23, 1925. Decided December 14, 1925. The provision of the Constitution granting this Court original juris- • diction “ in all cases affecting Ambassa
White v. Mechanics Securities Corp.
WHITE, TREASURER, et al. v. MECHANICS SECURITIES CORPORATION. UNITED STATES v. SECURITIES CORPORATION GENERAL. WHITE, TREASURER, et al. v. SECURITIES CORPORATION GENERAL. UNITED STATES v. EQUITABLE TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK. HICKS, ALIEN PR
Henderson Water Co. v. Corporation Commission
HENDERSON WATER COMPANY v. CORPORATION COMMISSION OF NORTH CAROLINA et al. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 249. Argued November 18, 1925. Decided December 14, 1925. Where a
Ex parte Wood
No. ■ — , original. Ex Parte In the matter of James A. Wood. December 7, 1925. Motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of habeas corpus herein denied. James A. Wood, pro se.
Pacific American Fisheries v. Alaska
PACIFIC AMERICAN FISHERIES v. ALASKA. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 246. Argued November 24, 1925. Decided December 7, 1925. 1. A graduated surtax on salmon 'canneries of five cents per case of the pr
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. United States
ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RY. CO. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 273. Argued Nov. 19, 20, 1925. Decided November 30, 1925. The provision of the Hours of Service Act, “ that no ope
Matthews v. Huwe
MARIANNA MATTHEWS v. HUWE, TREASURER. MORTIMOR MATTHEWS v. HUWE, TREASURER. error to the court op appeals por the first judicial DISTRICT OP OHIO. Nos. 39, 40. Submitted October 12, 1925. Decided November 30, 1925. 1. A decision of a state
Rowe v. Sartain
No. 276. Hattie Rowe v. Robert L. Sartain et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma, Motion to dismiss submitted November 16, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. Messrs. C. B. Ames, John Sander, E. T. Noble, A. D. Cochran and
Work v. Louisiana
WORK, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. LOUISIANA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 5. Argued October 6, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. 1. A suit by a State to restrain the Secretary of the'Interior' from reje
New York ex rel. Woodhaven Gas Light Co. v. Public Service Commission
NEW YORK ex rel. WOODHAVEN GAS LIGHT COMPANY v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION. error to the supreme court op new york. No. 33. Argued October 12, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. 1. A case involving the validity of an order requiring a gas comp
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. SLOSS-SHEFFIELD STEEL & IRON COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 25. Argued April 23, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. 1. The case is properly here on writ of erro
Edwards v. Douglas
EDWARDS, COLLECTOR, v. DOUGLAS et al., EXECUTORS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF. APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 129. Argued April 17, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. Section 31 (b), added by the Revenue Act of 1917 to the Revenue
United States v. Boston Insurance
UNITED STATES v. BOSTON INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 29. Argued October 9, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. The Revenue Act of 1916, § 12, Par. “First,” subdiv. (c), in defining deductions from gross income allowa
Central Union Telephone Co. v. City of Edwardsville
CENTRAL UNION TELEPHONE CO. v. CITY OF EDWARDSVILLE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 37. Argued October 13, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. 1. A system of state appellate practice (as in Illinois) which allows revi
Southern Electric Co. v. Stoddard
SOUTHERN ELECTRIC COMPANY v. STODDARD, SUPERINTENDENT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 42. Submitted October 14, 1925. Decided November 23, 1925. In proceedings brought by the New York Superintendent of Insurance to
Oklahoma v. Texas
No. 13. Original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, United States, Intervener. In Equity. Order entered November 16, 1925.
Concrete Appliances Co. v. Gomery
CONCRETE APPLIANCES COMPANY et al. v. GOMERY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE circuit 'COURT OF APPEALS FOR , THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 44. Argued October 14, 15, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. Concurrent findings of the District Court and Circui
Arkansas ex rel. Utley v. St. Louis-san Francisco Railway Co.
ARKANSAS ex rel. UTLEY, ATTORNEY GENERAL, FOR THE USE OF CRAIGHEAD COUNTY, v. ST. LOUIS-SAN FRANCISCO RAILWAY COMPANY et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 74. Argued October 22, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1.
Beazell v. Ohio
BEAZELL v. OHIO et al. CHATFIELD v. OHIO et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. Nos. 247, 248. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 5, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. The constitutional provision (Art. I. Sec.
Stephenson v. Kirtley
STEPHENSON et al. v. KIRTLEY et al. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT CF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 58. Submitted October 16, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. An attachment affidavit stating generally
Davis v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.
DAVIS, DIRECTOR GENERAL, v. JOHN L. ROPER LUMBER COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP VIRGINIA. No. 79. Submitted October 21, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. A loss due to misdelivery of a shipment by the carrier is no
Arkansas v. Tennessee
ARKANSAS v. TENNESSEE. No. 2, Original. Argued October 5, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. Commissioners appointed in this case to run, locate and designate part of the boundary between Arkansas and Tennessee along the middle of the main
Kansas City Structural Steel Co. v. Arkansas
KANSAS CITY STRUCTURAL STEEL COMPANY v. ARKANSAS, FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF ASHLEY COUNTY. • ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS, No. 54. Submitted October 15, 1925. Decided November 16, 1925. 1. As to what constitutes doin
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.