Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1925 Cases
289 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Arkansas River Gas Co. v. Board of County Commissioners
No. 197. The Arkansas River Gas Company v. Board of County Commissioners of Sedgwick County, Kansas, et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Kansas. Motion to. dismiss submitted October- 5, 1925. Decided October 12, 1925. Messrs.
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Janney
No. 144. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company v. Mrs. Abi Janney. Error, to the Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, of the State of Louisiana. Motion to dismiss or' affirm submitted October 5, 1925.. Decided October 12, 1925. Messrs.
Ex parte of the City of Monterey
No. — , original. Ex Parte in the Matter of the City of Monterey, October 12, 1925. Motion for leave to file petition for a writ of mandamus denied by the court in the exercise of its discretion, without prejudice to the petitioner’s other
Agnello v. United States
AGNELLO et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 6. Argued April 23, 1925. Decided October 12, 1925. 1. The right without a search warrant contemporaneously to search persons lawfully a
United States ex rel. Kennedy v. Tyler
UNITED STATES, EX REL. KENNEDY et al. v. TYLER, SHERIFF, et al. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW TORE. No. 125. Argued April 21, 22,1925. Decided October 12, 1925. 1. The power of a Distric
Patterson v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
PATTERSON et al. v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. et al. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 221. Argued April 23, 24, 1925. Decided October 12, 1925. 1. The power given the Interstate Commerce Commission
Chaprales v. Biddle
No. 1201. George Chaprales v. W. I. Biddle, Warden, Etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Kansas. June 8, 1925. Mr. Albert S. Marley for appellant. The Solicitor General and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for ap
Gitlow v. New York
GITLOW v. PEOPLE OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 19. Argued April 12, 1923; reargued November 23, 1923. Decided June 8, 1925. 1. Assumed, for the purposes of the case, that freedom of speech and of the
New York ex rel. Rosevale Realty Co. v. Kleinert
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK EX REL. ROSEVALE REALTY COMPANY v. KLEINERT, SUPERINTENDENT, ET AL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 350. Argued April 29, 1925. Decided June 8, 1925. Under a law authorizing an admini
Lee v. Osceola & Little River Road Improvement District No. 1
LEE ET AL. v. OSCEOLA & LITTLE RIVER ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 OF MISSISSIPPI COUNTY, ARKANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 336. Argued April 21, 27, 1925. Decided June 8, 1925. 1. A decree of a state supr
Davis v. L. L. Cohen & Co.
DAVIS, AGENT, v. L. L. COHEN & COMPANY, INC. -ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF BRISTOL COUNTY, STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 331. Argued April 21, 1925. Decided June 8, 1925. 1. A judgment entered in- the Superior Court in Massachusetts in acco
William Danzer & Co. v. Gulf & Ship Island Railroad
WILLIAM DANZER & COMPANY, INC. v. GULF & SHIP ISLAND RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF. THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 346. Argued April 28, 1925. Decided June 8, 1925. 1. The right of a shipp
Edwards v. Cuba Railroad
EDWARDS, FORMER COLLECTOR, v. CUBA RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR to the district court of the united states for THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 324. Argued April 15, 1925. Decided June 8, 1925. 1. The meaning of “income,” as used in § 38 o
Robertson v. Railroad Labor Board
ROBERTSON v. RAILROAD LABOR BOARD. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 739. Argued March 17, 18, 1925. Decided June 8, 1925. 1. ' Section 310, par. b, of the Transportation Act, 192
United States v. Noce
UNITED STATES v. NOCE. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 360. Argued April 30, 1925. Decided June 8, 1925. 1. An army officer held not entitled to count for longevity pay Iris service as a cadet in the Military Academy. P. 616. 2. The pr
United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corp.
No. 1261. The United States v. Butterworth-Judson Corporation. June 1, 1925. The Solicitor- General for the United States. Messrs. Eldon Bisbee and Bertram, F. Shipman for respondent.
Duffy v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
No. 1203. Charles V. Duffy, Former Collector of Internal Revenue, v. The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company. June 1, 1925. The Solicitor General for petitioner. Mr, John O, H, Pitney for respondent.
Bass v. City of Clifton
No. 1089. R. O. Bass v. The City of Clifton. Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Tenth Supreme Judicial District of the State of Texas. Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted May 11, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. Mr. W. A. Keeling for
United States v. Fish
UNITED STATES v. FISH. CERTORARI TO THE COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS. No. 653. Argued April 23, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. Under Jud. Code §§ 195, 198, the Court of Customs Appeals has jurisdiction to review a decision of a board of general
Cement Manufacturers Protective Ass'n v. United States
CEMENT MANUFACTURERS PROTECTIVE ASSOCIATION ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 551. Argued March 3, 5, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. Dissemination of info
Maple Flooring Manufacturers Ass'n v. United States
MAPLE FLOORING MANUFACTURERS ASSN. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 342. Argued December 1, 2, 1924; reargued March 3, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. In a
Second Russian Insurance v. Miller
SECOND RUSSIAN INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLER, ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, ET AL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 362. Argued April 30, May 1, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. After promulgation, in the earlier ye
United States v. Gulf Refining Co.
UNITED STATES v. GULF REFINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 40. Argued April 15, 16, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. 1. Under Jud. Code § 240, certiorari may be granted by this Court, at the in
Marr v. United States
MARR v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 236. Argued November 19, 1924; restored to docket for reargument January 5, 1925; reargued March 12, 1925. Decided June 1, 1925. A Delaware corporation, organized for the purpose,-
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.