Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. WESTINGHOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & CO., INC. MELLON, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF RAILROADS, v. WESTINGHOUSE, CHURCH, KERR & CO., INC. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. Nos. 170 and 1
Armour & Co. v. Fort Morgan Steamship Co.
ARMOUR & COMPANY v. FORT MORGAN STEAMSHIP COMPANY, LIMITED, et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. . No. 135. Argued January 14, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. The liability of a ship as surety for damage
Midland Land & Improvement Co. v. United States
MIDLAND LAND & IMPROVEMENT COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 105. Argued January 8, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. Where a contractor, though not in default, abandons-the work and refuses to complete the contract,
Iselin v. United States
ISELIN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 119. Argued January 12, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. Par. 3 of § 800(a) of Revenue Act of 1918, laying taxes on theater and opera tickets sold at newstands, hotels, etc., for
First Moon v. White Tail
FIRST MOON v. WHITE TAIL AND UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT QP OKLAHOMA. No. 191. Argued January 29, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1 A decision of the Secretary of the Interior det
Schlesinger v. Wisconsin
SCHLESINGER et al., EXECUTORS, etc., v. WISCONSIN et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 146. Argued January 18, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. A conclusive statutory presumption that all gifts of a material part
Sanchez v. Deering
SANCHEZ et al. v. DEERING. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 134. Argued January 14, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. Confirmation by Congress of a Spanish grant in Florida, (Acts of March 3, 1823, February
L. Littlejohn & Co. v. United States
L. LITTLEJOHN & CO., INC., et al. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 94. Argued January 7, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. Damages are not recoverable from the Un
United States v. Minnesota
UNITED STATES v. MINNESOTA. No. 17, Original. Argued January 4, 5, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. A suit against a State brought by the United States as guardian of tribal Indians to recover the title, or money proceeds, of lands alleged t
White v. United States
WHITE v. UNITED STATES et al. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 177. Argued January 26, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. The Act of March 5, 1925, giving appellate jurisdiction to t
Girard Trust Co. v. United States
GIRARD TRUST COMPANY, GEORGE STEVENSON, WILLIAM R. VERNER et al. v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 137. Argued January 14, 15, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. Where interest on tax refunds is allowed by statute, a suit
Rogers v. United States
ROGERS v. UNITED STATES APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS No. 153. Argued January 20, 21, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. The Army Reorganization Act of June 4, 1920, should be liberally construed to avoid unnecessary technical limitation upo
Morse v. United States
MORSE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 201. Motion to dismiss submitted February 1, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. Under Rule 90 of the Court- of Claims, after a motion, for new trial has been overruled another can no
United States v. Swift & Co.
UNITED STATES v. SWIFT & COMPANY. SWIFT & COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS Nos. 288 and 289. Submitted November 24, 1925. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. A finding by the Court of Claims that a general who signed a contr
Goldsmith v. United States Board of Tax Appeals
H. ELY GOLDSMITH, CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT, v. UNITED STATES BOARD OF TAX APPEALS. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 320. Argued November 30, 1925. Decided March 1, 1926. I. Power of the United States Board o
Cincinnati, Indianapolis & Western Railroad v. Indianapolis Union Railway Co.
CINCINNATI, INDIANAPOLIS & WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. INDIANAPOLIS UNION RAILWAY COMPANY, THE CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY, AND THE PITTSBURGH, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE
Southern Pacific Co. v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 805. Motion to dismiss appeal submitted February 1, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. This Court has-no jurisdiction to consider an appeal from a judgment of the
Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Washington
OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION COMPANY v. STATE OF WASHINGTON. . ERROR TO. THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 187. Argued January 28, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. 1. The power of the States to quarantine against impo
Independent Wireless Telegraph Co. v. Radio Corp. of America
INDEPENDENT WIRELESS TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. RADIO CORPORATION OF AMERICA. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 87. Petition for rehearing; denied March 1, 1926. This Court will not examine a point raised for
Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. Doughton
RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL TRUST COMPANY, EXECUTOR OF GEORGE BRIGGS, DECEASED, v. RUFUS A. DOUGHTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 106. Argued January 11, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926
Interocean Oil Co. v. United States
THE INTEROCEAN OIL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 115. Argued January 12, 1926. Decided March 1, 1926. Where a company, which supplied oil to the Government during the war, moved its storage tanks from the pl
Kelly v. Davis
No. 85. George H. Kelly et al., copartners, etc., v. Dwight F. Davis, Secretary of War, et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. February 1, 1926. Mr. Eugene West in behalf of Mr. W
United States v. Ritcey
No. 340. United States v. Harry Ritcey, Master of the British Schooner Marjorie E. Bachman, etc., et al. Appeal from the District Court' of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. February 1, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell an
United States v. Backman
No. 296. United States v. Arthur L. Backman, Master of the Schooner Frances Louise, etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. February 1, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell and Assistant Attor
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.