Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1926 Cases
356 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Claude P. Street Piano Co. v. City of Nashville
No. 580. Claude P. Street Piano Company, Roy Warden, Katherine D. Street, et al. v. City of Nashville, George J. Tompkins, J. W. Bauman, and Hilary E. House, etc. December 13, 1926.
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Hill
No. 467. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Company v. Sherman D. Hill, Administrator of the Estate of Thomas J. Hill, Deceased. December 13, 1926. Messrs. William A. Eggers, C. W. McMullen, and Morrison R. Waite for petitioner. Mr. Tho
Chin Wey v. Wixon
No. 66. Chin Wey v. Irving F. Wixon, Acting Commissioner of Immigration. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. Argued December 9, 1926. Decided December 13, 1926. Mr. Warren Ozro Kyle for ap-
Damon ex rel. Fong Hang Leong v. Johnson
No. 59. Everett Flint Damon ex rel. Fong Hang Leong v. John B. Johnson, Commissioner of Immigration. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Massachusetts. Argued December 7, 1926. Decided December 13, 1926.
Stege v. City of Richmond
No. 41. Edith Stege, William C. Dohrman (sometimes called W. C. Dohrman), Teresa L. Dohrman, etc., et al. v. City of Richmond and G. W. Cushing. Error to. the Supreme Court of the State of California. Argued December 1, 1926. Decided Decemb
Virginian Railway Co. v. United States
VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES et al. UNITED STATES et al. v. VIRGINIAN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. Nos. 281, 282. Argued October 29, 1926. Decided D
Dysart v. United States
DYSART v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 102. Submitted November 23, 1926. Decided December 13, 1926. Letters advertising a home for the care and protection of pregnant unmarried women a
United States v. Storrs
UNITED STATES v. STORRS et al. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE • DISTRICT OP UTAH. No. 95. Argued November 24, 1926. Decided December 13, 1926. A plea to abate an indictment because of the presence of a court stenographer
Wright v. Ynchausti & Co.
WRIGHT v. YNCHAUSTI AND COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 316. Argued October 28, 1926. Decided December 13, 1926. 1. A decision of the Insular Collector of Customs, of the Philippine Islands, ordering
Pacific Power & Light Co. v. Bayer
No. 84. Pacific Power and Light Company v. L. D. Bayer, Pearl Durst, William H. Bucher, et al. Argued December 7, 1926. Decided December 7, 1926. Mr. Henry S. Gray, with whom Messrs. Roger S. Greene and Will R. King were on the brief, for p
Seif ex rel. Seif v. Nagle
No. 707. Max Seif, on behalf of Nathan Seif, his brother v. John D. Nagle, Commissioner of Immigration. December 6, 1926. Messrs. C. A. A. McGee for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhñng, and Mr. Harry S.
United States v. McElvain
UNITED STATES v. McELVAIN et al. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 266. Submitted October 21, 1926. Decided December 6, 1926. 1. An indictment, under § 37 of the Criminal Code, for a conspi
Murphy v. United States
MURPHY et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 443. Argued November 24, 1926. Decided December 6, 1926. It is declared by the National Prohibition Act, Tit. II, § 21, that any room,
Marblehead Land Co. v. County of Los Angeles
No. 50. Marblehead Land Company v. County of Los Angeles, Prescott F. Cogswell, J. H. Bean, et al., etc. Error to the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, of the State of California. Argued December 2, 1926. Decided December
Lamborn v. Steamship Texas Maru
No. 704. Arthur H. Lamborn et al., surviving partners doing business under the firm name and style of Lamborn and Company v. Steamship Texas Maru, Kokusai Kisen Kabushiki Kaisha. November 29, 1926. Mr. Louis 0. Van Doran for petitioners. Mr
United States v. Arkell & Douglas, Inc.
No. 696. United States v. Arkell and Douglas, Inc., et. al., and Thomas G. Plant Company. November 29, 1926. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Letts, and Mr. J. Frank Staley for the United States. Mr. D. Roger Englar fo
Johnson v. Whitney Co.
No. 689. Ranghild Johnson v. Whitney Company. November 29, 1926. Mr. Arthur I. Moulton for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Fajardo v. Philippine Islands
No. 678. Rodolfo A. Fajardo v. Philippine Islands. November 29, 1926. Mr. Gabriel La O for petitioner. Mr. William 0. Rigby. for respondent.
Standard Transportation Co. v. United States
No. 616. Standard Transportation Company v. United States. November 29, 1926. Messrs. Gold-thwaite H. Dorr, Peter M. Speer, and Bussell H. Robbins for petitioner.' Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney Galloway, and Mr. J. Frank St
Qualsett v. Kattenburg
No. 309. Olaf Qualsett v. Reinold Kattenburg and Augusta Anderson. Error to the Supreme Court of the State-of Nebraska. Motion to dismiss submitted November 23, 1926. Decided November 29, 1926. Mr. F. D. Williams for defendants in error, in
Fasulo v. United States
FASULO v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 251. Argued October 13, 14, 1926. Decided November 29, 1926. A scheme for obtaining money, by means of intimidation through threats of murder and
Duffy v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
DUFFY, FORMER COLLECTOR, v. MUTUAL BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. . No. 108. Argued October 21, 22, 1926. Decided November 29, 1926. 1. The legal reserve of a mutual life in
Napier v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
NAPIER v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY. CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DI
Lambert v. Yellowley
LAMBERT v. YELLOWLEY et al. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 47. Argued April 30, 1926. Decided November 29, 1926. 1. The, provision of the National Prohibition Act. that. ‘‘ Not. move than a pint of spir
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.