Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Segurola v. United States
SEGUROLA et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 195. Argued October 12, 1927. Decided November 21, 1927. 1. Under the Organic Act of Porto Rico an accused person is entitled to have a
Wickwire v. Reinecke
WICKWIRE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX, v. REINECKE, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. CERTIORARI TO THE' CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 149. Submitted October 3, 1927. Decided November 21, 1927. 1. A decision of the Com
Compañía General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue
COMPAÑÍA GENERAL DE TABACOS DE FILIPINAS v. COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME -COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 42. Argued October 18, 19, 1927. Decided November 21, 1927. 1. A foreign corporation which has proper
Gong Lum v. Rice
GONG LUM et al. v. RICE et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 29. Submitted October 12, 1927. Decided November 21, 1927. A child of Chinese blood, born in, and a citizen of, the United States, is not denied the
Fairmont Creamery Co. v. Minnesota
FAIRMONT CREAMERY COMPANY v. MINNESOTA. MOTION-TO EETAX COSTS. No. 725, October Term, 1926. Submitted October 17, 1927. Decided November 21, 1927. 1. A clause imposing' costs inserted in a final judgment of this Court by the clerk and- appr
Kay v. Snyder
No. 444. Maurice Kay and Benjamin Kay v. Edgar C. Snyder, United States Marshal. October 31, 1927. Messrs. J. S. Easby-Smith, David A., Pine, A. L. Newmyer and Milton W. King for petitioners. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney G
Pearlman v. United States
No. 438. Barney Pearlman v. United States. October 31, 1927. Messrs. Hall S. Lusk and Barney Pearlman, pro se, for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt and Mr. Lawrénce J. Kosters for the United Sta
Arkansas & Memphis Railway Bridge & Terminal Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Attorney General
No. 429. Arkansas & Memphis Railway Bridge & Terminal Company v. Arkansas ex rel. Attorney General. October 31, 1927. Mr. J. W. Canada for petitioner. Messrs. H. W. Applegate, Joe T. Robinson, J. W. House and C. H. Moses for respondent.
Modern Workmen of World v. Hartmann
No. 422. Modern Workmen of the World et al. v. Charles A. Hartmann et al. October 31, 1927. Messrs. W. Bissell Thomas, Walter H. Newton and J. K. M. Norton for petitioners. No appearance for respondents. .
Pittsburgh Hotels Co. v. United States
No. 406. Pittsburgh Hotels Company v. United States. October 31, 1927. Mr. George R. Bene-man for petitioner. • Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway and Mr. Alexander H. McCormick for the United States.
Willett v. Herrick
No. 396. George F. Willett et al. v. Robert F. Herrick et al. October 31, 1927. Messrs. Sherman L. Whipple, Joseph Wiggin and Boyd B. Jones for petitioners. Messrs. Thomas Hunt, Malcolm Donald, Lowell A. Mayberry, George L. Mayberry, Hugh D
City of Gainesville v. Brown-Crummer Investment Co.
No. 433. City of Gainesville v. Brown-Crummer Investment Company et al. October 31, 1927. Mr. W. 0. Davis for petitioner. Messrs. F. C. Dillard, Rice Maxey, Rhodes S. Baker, H. 0„ Head and James G. Martin for respondents.
Draxton v. Fitch
No. 77. Gunder Draxton et al. v. C. P. Fitch et al. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. Argued October 27, 1927. Decided October 31, 1927. Mr. James Manahan for plaintiffs in error, submitted. Mr. Victor E. Anderson, with
Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad v. Texas
No. 36. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company v. Texas. On writ of certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals, Third Supreme Judicial District, State of Texas. Argued October 17, 1927. Decided October 31, 1927. Mr. Aléx H. Mc-Kniaht, with wh
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Goodman
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. GOODMAN, ADMINISTRATRIX. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COÚRT OP APPEALS- FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 58. Argued October 20, 1927. Decided October 31, 1927. 1. One who drives upon a railroad track relying upon
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Southwell
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. SOUTHWELL, ADMINISTRATRIX. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NORTH CAROLINA. No. 41. Argued October 18, 1927. Decided October 31, 1927. Assuming that a railroad company could be held lia
Morris v. United States
No. 379. Monty Morris v. United States. October 24, 1927. Mr. James P. Gilmore for petitioner. Solicitor' General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt and Mr. Mahlon D. Kiefer for the United States.
Truman v. Thalheimer
No. 369. George E. Truman, County Treasurer, J. C. Callaghan, Treasurer, et al. v. Walter J. Thalheimer, Trustee. October 24, 1927. Messrs. John W. Murphy and Earl Anderson for petitioners. Mr. Henderson Stockton for respondent.
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. United States
No. 362. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company v. United States. October 24, 1927. Messrs. F. W. Clements and Lawrence H. Cake for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway and Mr. Lisle A. Smith fo
Gulf & Ship Island Railroad v. Curtis
No. 357. The Gulf and Ship Island Railroad Company v. Mrs. Rubie Curtis, Administratrix. October 24, 1927. Messrs. T. J. Wills ,and R. V. Fletcher for petitioner. Mrs. Ruble Curtis, pro. se.
Stearn v. United States
No. 353. George Westcott Stearn et al. v. United States. October 24, 1927. Mr. T. F. Railsback for petitioners. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for the United States.
Patterson v. New York Central Railroad
No. 339. Minnie E. Patterson, Administratrix, v. New York Central Railroad Company, sued as New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company. October 24, 1927. Mr. Walter A: Fullerton for petitioner. Mr. Sherman A. Murphy for respondent.
Mitchell v. United States
No. 376. John J. Mitchell et al., Executors, v. United States. October 24, 1927. Messrs. Milward W. Martin and A. L. Humes for petitioners. Solicitor General Mitchell^ Assistant Attorney General Galloway- and Mr. Alexander H. McCormick for
Finkelstein & Kommel v. United States
No. 346. Finkelstein & Kommel v. United States. October 24, 1927. Mr. Frederick W. Brooks, Jr., for petitioners. Solicitor General Mitchell and Mr. Cyril S. Lawrence for the United States..
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.