Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Verner v. United States
No. 222. William R. Verner, Executor, v. United States. October 10, 1927. Messrs. James C. Peacock and John W. Townsend for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway and Mr. Aléxander H. McCormick for the U
Austin v. United States
No. 427. J. D. Austin v. United States. October 10, 1927. Mr. J. D. Austin, pro se. Solicitor, General) .Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Luhring and Mr. Harry S. Ridgely for the United States.
Alaska Packers Ass'n v. Industrial Accident Commission
No. 266. Alaska Packers Association v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California and John Peterson. October 10, 1927. Mr. Allen L. Cbickering for petitioner. Messrs. H. W. Hutton and G. C. Faulkner for respondents.
Ex parte Turner
No. —, original, Ex parte Turner. October 10, 1927.
Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Middlesex Water Co.
No. 101. Board of Public Utility Commissioners v. Middlesex Water Company. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. Motion to dismiss submitted October 3, 1927. Decided October 10, 1927. Mr. Frank
Mammoth Oil Co. v. United States
MAMMOTH OIL COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 140. Argued April 12, 13, 1927. Decided October 10, 1927. 1. The lease and contract in this case — which involve inter, alia
United States ex rel. Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. McCarl
UNITED STATES ex rel. SKINNER & EDDY CORPORATION v. McCARL, COMPTROLLER GENERAL. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 30. Argued April 14, 18, 1927. Decided October 10, 1927. 1. Claims arising out of' contract
Hudson Coal Co. v. Pennsylvania
No. 136. Hudson Coal Company v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. October 3, 1927. Messrs. John H. Barnes, William S. Snyder and H. T. Newcomb for plaintiff in error. Messrs. George W. Woodruff and John R. Jones for defendant in error.
Vought v. Kanne
No. 51. Andrew P. Vought v. K. K. Kanne, Trustee. October 3, 1927. Dismissed with costs on motion of Mr. Charles Bunn for petitioner. Mr. Charles B. Elliott for respondent.
Adams v. United States
No. 15. Thomas M. Adams v. United States. October 3, 1927. Dismissed per stipulation of counsel, on motion of Solicitor. General Mitchell, Attorney General Galloway, and Mr. A. W. Gregg, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, for the
United States v. Arnold
No. 123. United States v. David R. J. Arnold, Admr. July 5, 1927. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General* Galloway and Mr. Fred K. Dydr for the .United States. Mr. T. Ludlow Chrystié for respondent.
In re Fairbanks, Morse & Co.
No. —, original. Ex Parte: In the Matter of Fairbanks, Morse & Co. and Sheffield Car Company. June 6, 1927. Messrs. Fred L. Chappell and Dwight B. Cheever for petitioners.
United States v. International Harvester Co.
UNITED STATES v. INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER COMPANY et al. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 254. Argued October 26, 1926. Decided June 6, 1927. 1. In a suit under the Anti-Trust Act, against a cor
Twist v. Prairie Oil & Gas Co.
TWIST et al. v. PRAIRIE OIL & GAS COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 301,302. Argued April 28, 29, 1927. Decided June 6, 1927. 1. When a suit, begun in a state court, on a cause of action at law
Mayor of Vidalia v. McNeely
MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF VIDALIA v. McNEELY, ADMINISTRATRIX. McNEELY, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. MAYOR AND BOARD OF ALDERMEN OF THE TOWN OF VIDALIA. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIA
Weedin v. Bow
WEEDIN, COMMISSIONER OF IMMIGRATION, v. CHIN BOW. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT No. 237. Argued March 16, 1927. Decided June 6, 1927. 1. Under Rev. Stats. § 1993, which provides: "All children heretofore b
Angelo v. City of Winston-Salem
No. 996. E. J. Angelo, Harry Phillips, and C. E. Wall, trading, etc., et al. v. City of Winston-Salem, Thos. Barber, Mayor, and J. A. Thomas, etc. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of North Carolina. Motion to dismiss or affirm submit
State v. Fasken
No. 749. State of Texas v. David Fasken, A. Fasken, Robert Fasken, et al. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas. Motion to dismiss submitted May 16, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. Mr. Charles L.
Fox River Paper Co. v. Railroad Commission
FOX RIVER PAPER COMPANY et al. v. RAILROAD COMMISSION OF WISCONSIN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 492. Argued April 11, 12, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. 1. The jurisdiction of this Court to review a judgment of a
Independent Coal & Coke Co. v. United States
INDEPENDENT COAL & COKE COMPANY et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 300. Argued April 26, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. 1. A bill in the nature of a supplemental bill is approp
Portneuf-Marsh Valley Canal Co. v. Brown
PORTNEUF-MARSH VALLEY CANAL COMPANY v. BROWN et al., TRUSTEES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 252. Argued March 18, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. 1. The Act of Congress known as the Carey Act, as amended
Federal Trade Commission v. Eastman Kodak Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY et al. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 215. Argued March 10, 11, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. . 1. The Federal Trade Commission can exercise only the ad
Stewart & Co. v. Rivara
STEWART & COMPANY v. RIVARA. ERROR to the supreme court op the STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 290. Argued April 22, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. Section 65 of the New York Personal Property Law, provides that, whenever articles sold on condition tha
Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co. v. United States
MERRITT & CHAPMAN DERRICK & WRECKING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. EEEOE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTBICT COUET FOE THE SOUTHEEN DISTBICT OF NEW YORK. No. 214. Argued March 10, 1927. Decided May 31, 1927. The aid or benefit to a ship resulting inc
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.