Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Frost v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
No. 375. W. A. Frost, Doing Business Under the Name of Mitchell Gin Company v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma, Fred Caphaw, et al., etc. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma. Argued Ap
Pierce v. Barker
No. 294. Henry Clay Pierce v. W. J. Barker, J. W. Tartar, and Industrial Commission of Wisconsin. Error to the Supreme . Court of the State of Wisconsin. Argued April 25, 1927. Decided May 2, 1927. (Messrs. Clarence J. Hartley and J. A. Fow
Ex parte Saunders
No. —, original. Ex parte: Joseph G. Saunders. May 2, 1927. Mr. Joseph G. Saunders, pro se.
Kercheval v. United States
KERCHEVAL v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 705. Argued January 19, 1927. Decided May 2, 1927. A plea of guilty withdrawn by leave of court is not admissible against the defendant on th
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. United States
LIGGETT & MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 362. Argued March 3, 1927. Decided May 2, 1927. ■1. A continuing order for naval supplies made during the late war by direction of the President, under
Burnrite Coal Briquette Co. v. Riggs
BURNRITE COAL BRIQUETTE COMPANY v. RIGGS et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 227. Argued March 11, 14, 1927. Decided May 2, 1927. 1. The objection to the bringing of a suit, dependent on diversity of
Buck v. Bell
BUCK v. BELL, SUPERINTENDENT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP VIRGINIA. No. 292. Argued April 22, 1927. Decided May 2, 1927. 1. The Virginia statute providing for the sexual sterilization of inmates of institutions sup
Schuman Bros. v. First National Bank
No. 278. Schuman Brothers, a Copartnership, Consisting of Morris Schuman and Joseph M. Schuman, v. First National Bank of Skiatook. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Argued April 19, 1927. Decided April 25, 1927. Mr. C. L
Mellon v. Gray
No. 280. Andrew W. Mellon, Director General of Railroads, v. Leah M. Gray, Administratrix of the Estate of Glen E. Gray. Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. Submitted April 19, 1927. Decided April 25, 1927. Mes
State v. State
No. 6, original. State of Oklahoma v. State of Texas, United States, Intervener. April 25, 1927.
Duignan v. United States
DUIGNAN v. UNITED STATES et al. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No, 101. Argued February 21, 1927. Decided April 25, 1927. 1. Case held properly reviewable by appeal under Jud. Code § 241, before amendment,
Gould-Mersereau Co. v. Williams Bros. Aircraft Corp.
No. 283. Gould-Mersereau Company v. Williams Bros. Aircraft Corporation. Certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Argued April 21, 1927. Decided April 21, 1927. Mr. William S. Pritchard, with whom Mr. Ernest G. Met
Pinkerton v. Wengert
No. 246. Allan Pinkerton, doing business as Pinkertons’ National Detective Agency, and Corporations Auxiliary Company v. Eugene Wengert, John W. Woller, George Page, and Charles Reichenbach. Appeal from the District Court of the United Stat
In re Barber Asphalt Co.
No. —, original. Ex parte: In the matter of Barber Asphalt Company. April 18, 1927. Messrs. John W. Davis, Charles Neave, Samuel E. Hibben, Henry N. Paul, and Edward L, Patterson for petitioner.
Road Improvement District No. 1 v. Missouri Pacific Railroad
ROAD IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 1 OF FRANKLIN COUNTY, ARKANSAS, et al. v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 38. Argued April 19, 1926. Decided April 18, 1927. 1. A legislat
Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. GOODBODY, RECEIVER, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT- OF THE -UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. Nos. 168, 178. Argued February 25, 1
Kadow v. Paul
KADOW et al. v. PAUL et al. COMMISSIONERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 241. Argued March 16, 1927. Decided April 18, 1927. 1. Section 4439-6 of the Laws of Washington, 1923, which provides a supplemental asses
Federal Trade Commission v. Claire Furnace Co.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al. v. CLAIRE FURNACE COMPANY et al. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 1. Argued December 6, 1923; reargued November 24, 1925. Decided April 18, 1927. 1. An order of the Federal Tr
Federal Trade Commission v. Klesner
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. KLESNER. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 211. Argued March 10, 1927. Decided April 18, 1927. . The provision of the Federal Trade Commission Act, § 5, conferring jurisdiction o
Morris v. Duby
MORRIS et al. v. DUBY et al., COMMISSIONERS. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 372. Argued October 29, 1926. Decided April 18, 1927. 1. The power of the States to make reasonable regulations
Fidelity National Bank & Trust Co. v. Swope
FIDELITY NATIONAL BANK & TRUST COMPANY OF KANSAS CITY et al. v. SWOPE et al. appeal from the circuit court of appeals for the EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 46. Argued April 29, 30, 1926. Decided April 11, 1927. 1. Where jurisdiction of the District C
New York Dock Co. v. Steamship Poznan
NEW YORK DOCK COMPANY v. STEAMSHIP POZNAN, etc., et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 229. Argued March 15, 1927. Decided April 11, 1927. 1. Wharfage service rendered to an arrested ship with the app
Louis Pizitz Dry Goods Co. v. Yeldell
LOUIS PIZITZ DRY GOODS COMPANY, INC. v. YELDELL, ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP ALABAMA. No. 171. Argued February 25, 28, 1927. Decided April 11, 1927. A state law allowing punitive damages to be assessed in actio
United States ex rel. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United States Tariff Commission
UNITED STATES ex rel. NORWEGIAN NITROGEN PRODUCTS COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES TARIFF COMMISSION. EEBOE TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 91. Argued March 3, 4, 1927. Decided April 11, 1927. 1. Under Jud. Code § 250
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.