Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1927 Cases
376 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. S. S. White Dental Manufacturing Co.
UNITED STATES v. S. S. WHITE DENTAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 291. Argued April 22, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. Under § 234 of the Revenue Act of 1918 which authorizes the deduction from gross income i
Ohio ex rel. Clarke v. Deckebach
OHIO ex rel. CLARKE v. DECKEBACH, AUDITOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. No. 272. Argued April 18, 19, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. Construction of the pleadings by the state supreme court as sufficiently drawing in que
Fort Smith Light & Traction Co. v. Board of Improvement of Paving District No. 16
FORT SMITH LIGHT AND TRACTION COMPANY v. BOARD OF IMPROVEMENT OF PAVING DISTRICT NO. 16 OF THE CITY OF FORT SMITH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 269. Submitted March 17, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. Under the po
Fiske v. Kansas
FISKE v. KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 48. Argued May 3, 1926. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. A decision of a state court applying and enforcing a state statute of general scope against a particular transaction as
Whitney v. California
WHITNEY v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE. DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT, DIVISION ONE, OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 3. Argued October 6, 1925; reargued March 18, 1926. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. This Court acquires no juris
Hess v. Pawloski
HESS v. PAWLOSKI. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WORCESTER COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS. No. 263. Argued April 18, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. Massachusetts Gen. Ls., c. 90, as aménded by -Stat. 1923, c. 431, § 2, which declares that use of the St
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY et al. v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF THE STATE OF IDAHO. CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE. STATE OF IDAHO. No. 242. Argued March 17, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. A State cannot requi
Phelps v. United States
PHELPS v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 531. Argued March 3, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. A claim for just compensation for the use of property taken by the Government is.“ founded 'upon the Constitution,” within t
Burns v. United States
BURNS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 135. Argued November 24, 1926. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. The California statute defining and punishing criminal syndicalism ■ is n
Zahn v. Board of Public Works
ZAHN et al. v. BOARD OF PUBLIC WORKS et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP CALIFORNIA. No. 196. Argued March 7, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. A zoning ordinance dividing the City of Los Angeles into five building zones and pres
Baltimore Steamship Co. v. Phillips
BALTIMORE STEAMSHIP COMPANY et al. v. PHILLIPS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 271. Argued April 18, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. A judgment in an action for personal injuries, based on one ground o
United States v. Ludey
UNITED STATES v. LUDEY. certiorari to the court of claims. No. 289. Argued April 21, 22, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. Under the income and excess profits provisions of the Revenue Act of 1916, as amended by Revenue Act of 1917, in determi
Alston v. United States
ALSTON v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 898. Argued April 14, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. Section 9 of the original Harrison Narcotic Act, prescribing that any person who violate
Hope Natural Gas Co. v. Hall, State Tax Commissioner
HOPE NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. HALL, STATE TAX COMMISSIONER, et al. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP APPEALS OP THE STATE OP WEST VIRGINIA. No. 815. Argued April 21, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. ISA state court’s construction of a state statute is
Deal v. United States
DEAL et al. v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF,.APPEARS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 344. Submitted April 25, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. A postmaster is not liable as an insurer under Rev. Stats. § 3846 for the loss of a
United States v. Sisal Sales Corp.
UNITED STATES v. SISAL SALES CORPORATION et al. APPEAL PROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 200. Argued March 9, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. I.. A combination, entered into by parties within the U
United States v. Alford
UNITED STATES v. ALFORD. J3RROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF- FLORIDA. No. 983. Argued April 28, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927.
United States v. Sullivan
UNITED STATES v. SULLIVAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 851. Argued April 27, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. Gains from illicit traffic ,in liquor are subject to the income tax. P. 263. 2. The Fifth
Westfall v. United States
WESTFALL v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 766. Argued March 8, 9, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. Section 9 of the Federal Reserve Act, "ag amended June 21, 1917, is constitutional in
Zimmermann v. Sutherland, Alien Property Custodian
ZIMMERMANN et al. v. SUTHERLAND, ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, et al. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 180. Argued March 1, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. In a suit under the Trading with the Enemy Act to satisf
United States v. Stone & Downer Co.
UNITED STATES v. STONE & DOWNER COMPANY et al. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CUSTOMS APPEALS. No. 150. Argued February 24, 1927. Decided May 16, 1927. 1. A judgment of the Court of Customs Appeals deciding the classification of g
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Spiller
ST. LOUIS & SAN FRANCISCO RAILROAD COMPANY et al. v. SPILLER et al. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT pF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. ’ No. 577. Argued April 12, 1927. Decided May 15, 1927. 1. Assuming that a shipper’s claim for moneys col
Midland Oil Co. v. Ball
No. 308. Midland Oil Company v. Benjamin Ball. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oklahoma. Argued April 29, 1927. Decided May 2, 1927. Mr. Samuel N. Hawkes, with whom Mr. Hayes McCoy was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Messrs
Fife v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners
No. 880. Joseph B. Fife and Walter W. Fife v. Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners; No. 881. Joseph B. Fife and Walter W. Fife v. State of Louisiana; and No. 882. Joseph B. Fife and Walter W. Fife v. State of Louisiana. Error to the S
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.