Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1928 Cases
188 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New York ex rel. Bryant v. Zimmerman
NEW YORK ex rel. BRYANT v. ZIMMERMAN et al. No. 2. Submitted October 11, 1927. Decided November 19, 1928. Messrs. John H. Connaughton, Wm. F. Zumbrunn, and Wm. B. Brown submitted for plaintiff in error! Messrs. Albert Ottinger, Attorney Gen
United States v. Lenson
UNITED STATES v. LENSON. No. 48. Argued, October 24, 1928. Decided November 19, 1928. Solicitor General Mitchell, with whom Assistant Attorney General Galloway was on the brief, for the United States. Mr. George A. King, with whom Messrs. W
United States v. Cambridge Loan & Building Co.
UNITED STATES v. CAMBRIDGE LOAN AND BUILDING COMPANY. No. 46. Argued October 23, 24, 1928. Decided November 19, 1928. Mr. T. H. Lewis, Jr., Attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue with whom Solicitor General Mitchell and Assistant Attorney Gen
Boston Sand & Gravel Co. v. United States
BOSTON SAND AND GRAVEL COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. No. 15. Argued February 28, 29, 1928. Reargued October 18, 1928. Decided November 19, 1928. Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Mr. Foye M. Murphy was on the brief, for petitioner: Assistant Attorne
Lehigh Valley Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS et al. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 24 and 54. Argued October 10, 11, 1928. Decided November 19, 1928. Messrs. Duane E. Minará and George S. Hobart, with whom Mr. E. H. Burgess w
Weiss v. Wiener
No. 482. No. 483. Weiss, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Wiener; and Routzahn, Collector of Internal Revenue, v. Wiener. October 29, 1928. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Mabel Walker Willebrandt, and Mr. Clarence M
Alberto v. Nicolas
No. 364. Alberto v. Nicolas. October 29, 1928. Messrs. Wm. Cattron Rigby, J. A. Hull, and Edward A. Kreger for petitioner. Messrs. Henry J. Richardson, Pedro Queraro, and Harold R Young for respondent.
Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. Tyner
No. 62. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. Co. v. Tyner, Administrator. Argued October 26, 1928. Decided October 29, 1928. Mr. Thomas W. Davis, with whom Mr. Simeon Hyde was on the brief, for petitioner. Messrs. Lionel Legge and John P. Grace for re
State Road Commission v. Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co.
No. 55. No. 56. No. 57. State Road Commission et al. v. Monongahela West Penn Public Service Co. et al.; State Road Commission et al. v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. et al.; and State Road Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. et al. Argue
Remington Arms Union Metallic Cartridge Co. v. United States
No. 40. Remington Arms Union Metallic Cartridge Co., Inc., v. United States. Argued October 22, 23, 1928. Decided October 29, 1928. Mr. Wm. Wallace, Jr., for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, and M
United States Printing & Lithograph Co. v. Griggs, Cooper & Co.
No. 372. United States Printing and Lithograph Co. v. Griggs, Cooper & Co. October 22, 1928. Messrs. Frank F. Dinsmore and Waiter F. Murray for petitioner. Messrs. S. Howard Morphy and Oms P. Cobb, for respondent.
Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue
No. 335. Compania General de Tabacos de Filipinas v. Collector of Internal Revenue. October 22, 1928. Messrs. Clyde A. DeWitt, E. Arthur Perkins, F. W. Clements, and Lawrence H. Cake for petitioner. Messrs. Wm. Cattron Rigby, Edward A. Kreg
Craine v. Virginia
No. 38. Craine v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al. Argued October 19, 1928. Decided October 22, 1928. Mr. A. W. Patterson for petitioner. Mr. Leon M. Bazile, with whom Mr. E. Warre7i Wall was on the brief, for respondents.
Doucet v. Fontenot
No. 113. Doucet et al. v. Fontenot, Sheriff, et al. Motion submitted October 15, 1928. Decided October 22, 1928. Mr. Joseph George Medlenka for defendants in error in support of the motion.- Mr. Harry P. Sneed for plaintiff in error in oppo
Maney v. United States
MANEY v. UNITED STATES. No. 27. Argued October 11, 1928. Decided October 22, 1928. Messrs. Bruno V. Bitker and Louis Marshall, with whom Mr. Edwin S. Mack was on the brief, for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, with whom Assistant Att
Douglas v. New York, New Haven & Hartford R. R.
No. 312. Douglas v. New York, New Haven and Hartford R. R. Co. October 15, 1928. Mr. Thomas J. O’Neill for petitioner. Mr. John M. Gibbons for respondent.
Wallace v. Motor Products Corp'n
No. 261. Wallace v. Motor Products Corp’n et al. October 15, 1928. Messrs. Alfred Lucking and Howell Van Aulcen for petitioner. Messrs. Charles B,.Warren and Sherwin A. Hill for respondents.
Gonzalez v. Roman Catholic Archbishop
No. 226. Gonzalez v. The Roman Catholic Archbishop of Manila. October 15, 1928. Messrs. Howard Thayer Kingsbury, Frederic R. Coudert, and Allison D. Gibbs for petitioner. Messers.. George J. Gillespie and William D. Guthrie for respondent.
Carson Petroleum Co. v. Vial
No. 306. Carson Petroleum Co. v. Vial et al. October 15, 1928. Mr. Wm. E. Leahy for plaintiff in error and appellant. Mr. Harry P. Sneed for. defendant in error and appellee. See post, p. 595.
Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Muegge
No. 30. The Consolidated Flour Mills Co. v. Muegge et al. Argued October 12, 1928. Decided October 15, 1928. Messrs. Edward F. Colladay and John R. Beeching for plaintiff in error. Messrs. Lucas P. Loving and L. L. Hamner for defendants in
Standard Pipe Line Co. v. Commissioners of Index Sulphur Drainage District
No. 11. Standard Pipe Line Company, Inc., et al. v. Commissioners of Index Sulphur Drainage District. Argued October 8,^ 9, 1928. Decided October 15, 1928. Messrs. William H. Arnold and David C. Arnold for petitioners.
Johnson v. Haydel
JOHNSON, JR., et al. v. HAYDEL et al. No. 69. Argued April 18, 1928. Decided October 15, 1928.
Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel
FOSTER-FOUNTAIN PACKING COMPANY et al v. HAYDEL. No. 68. Argued April 18, 1928. Decided October 15, 1928. Messrs. William H. W\atkins and W. Lee Guice, with whom Mr. Gustave Lemle was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Michael M. Irwin a
Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergecy Fleet Corp.
No. 220. Johnson v. United States Shipping Board Emergecy Fleet Corporation. October 8, 1928. Messrs. Silas B.. Axtel and Charles A. Ellis for petitioner. Solicitor General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Farnum¡ and Messrs. J. Frank-S
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.