Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1928 Cases
188 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Williams
Ex parte WILLIAMS, TAX COMMISSIONER. No. 16, Original. Return to Rule submitted April 9, 1928. Decided May 21, 1928. Messrs. O. S. Spillman, Attorney General of Nebraska, George L. Basye, and Hugh LaMaster, Assistant Attorneys General, were
Jenkins v. National Surety Co.
JENKINS, RECEIVER, et al. v. NATIONAL SURETY COMPANY. No. 424. Argued April 11, 12, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Messrs. Paul H. Ray and John Jensen, with whom Messrs. Emmett M. Bagley, Robert' L. Judd, A. M. Cheney, and Harold M• Stephens w
Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.
HOLLAND FURNITURE COMPANY v. PERKINS GLUE COMPANY. No. 285. Argued March 14, 15, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. Charles Evans Hughes, with whom Messrs. Wm. H. Davis, James A. Watson, and R. Morton Adams were on the brief, for petitioner. M
Reinecke v. Gardner
REINECKE, COLLECTOR, v. GARDNER, TRUSTEE. No. 471. Argued April 17, 18, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Assistant Attorney General Mabel Walker Willebrandt, with whom Solicitor General Mitchell and Messrs. Sewall Key and J. Louis Monarch, Attor
United States v. Goldman
UNITED STATES v. GOLDMAN et al. No. 723. Argued April 10, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Assistant to the Attorney General Donovan, with whom Solicitor General Mitchell, and Messrs. Porter R. Chandler, Ralstone R. Irvine, and W. Houston Kenyon
Buzynski v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.
BUZYNSKI v. LUCKENBACH STEAMSHIP COMPANY, INCORPORATED, et al. No. 534. Argued March 19, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. W. E. Price, with whom Mr. James W. Wayman was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. J. Newton Rayzor, with whom Mr. Mart H
Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi ex rel. Knox
PANHANDLE OIL COMPANY v. MISSISSIPPI ex rel. KNOX, ATTORNEY GENERAL. No. 288. Argued March 5, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. George Butler for plaintiff in error. The Acts in question, as construed, are void in that they impose a direct bu
Federal Intermediate Credit Bank v. Mitchell
FEDERAL INTERMEDIATE CREDIT BANK OF COLUMBIA, SOUTH CAROLINA, v. MITCHELL et al. No. 456. Argued .March 13, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr.D. W. Robinson, with whom Messrs. R. H. Welch and Randolph Murdaugh were on the briefs, for petitione
Springer v. Government of Philippine Islands
SPRINGER et al. v. GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. AGONCILLO v. SAME. Nos. 564 and 573. Argued April 10, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Messrs. José A. Santos, James Ross, Quintín Paredes, and Claro M. Recto
Nectow v. City of Cambridge
NECTOW v. CITY OF CAMBRIDGE et al. No. 509. Argued April 19, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Messrs. Judson Hannigan and John E. Hannigan for plaintiff in error. Mr. Peter J. Nelligan, with, whom Messrs. J. Edward Nally and Joseph P. Lyons were
Great Northern Railway Co. v. United States
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 612. Argued April 27, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. F. G. Dorety, with whom Messrs. Thomas Balmer and Fletcher Rockwood were on the brief, for appellant. The Commission’s certifi
Sprout v. City of South Bend
SPROUT v. CITY OF SOUTH BEND. No. 208. Submitted January 20, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. Dudley M. Shively, with whom ¡ Messrs. Isaac K. Parks, Frank Gilmer, and Walter R. Arnold were on the brief, submitted for plaintiff in error. If t
Standard Pipe Line Co. v. Miller County Highway & Bridge District
STANDARD PIPE LINE COMPANY v. MILLER COUNTY HIGHWAY & BRIDGE DISTRICT No. 577. Argued April 20, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. Wm. H. Arnold, with whom Messrs. T. M. Milling, W. H. Arnold, Jr., and David C. Arnold were on the brief, for pe
St. Louis & Southwestern Railway Co. v. Nattin
ST. LOUIS & SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. NATTIN, TAX COLLECTOR. No. 263. Argued March 2, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. John D. Wilkinson, with whom Messrs. J. R. Turney, C. Huffman Lewis, and William Scott Wilkinson were on the brief,
Plamals v. S. S. "Pinar Del Rio"
PLAMALS v. S. S. “PINAR DEL RIO,” etc. No. 225. Argued February 27, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. .Mr. Charles A. Ellis, with whom Mr. Silas B. Axtell was on the brief, for petitioner. An American court of admiralty having jurisdiction of a c
Long v. Rockwood
LONG, COMMISSIONER, v. ROCKWOOD. SAME v. SAME. Nos. 201 and 202. Argued January 20, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. F. Delano Putnam, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, with whom Messrs. Arthur K. Reading, Attorney General, and R.
Hamburg-American Line Terminal & Navigation Co. v. United States
HAMBURG-AMERICAN LINE TERMINAL & NAVIGATION COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. ATLAS LINE STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 3, 4, 5. Argued April 25, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. Charles H. Le Fevre for appellants. Solicitor General M
Sultan Railway & Timber Co. v. Department of Labor & Industries
SULTAN RAILWAY & TIMBER COMPANY v. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON et al. ECLIPSE MILL COMPANY v. SAME. Nos. 274 and 275. Argued March 5, 1928 Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. Frederic E. Fuller, with whom Messrs. Jam
King Manufacturing Co. v. City Council of Augusta
KING MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CITY COUNCIL OF AUGUSTA et al. No. 392. Argued March 12, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. Bryan Cumming for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. H. Callaway, with whom Mr. Archibald Black-shear, City Attorney, was on the.
L. P. Larson, Jr., Co. v. Wm. Wrigley, Jr., Co.
L. P. LARSON, JR., COMPANY v. WM. WRIGLEY, JR., COMPANY No. 603. Argued April 26, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Messrs. Charles A. Aldrich and George I. Haight, with whom Messrs. Chester D. Kern, Ralph L. Peck, and Charles R. Aldrich were on
Ferry v. Ramsey
FERRY v. RAMSEY et al. HARRIS, EXECUTOR, v. RAMSEY et al. Nos. 407 to 418, inclusive. Argued April 25, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Messrs. J. B. McKay and L. J. Bond were on the brief for Ferry. Want of knowledge being a defense, the defend
Gaines v. Washington
GAINES v. WASHINGTON. No. 841. Submitted April 23, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Messrs. W. P. Guthrie, G. E. M. Pratt, and Howard T. Ballard were on the brief for plaintiff in error. Mr. Ewing D. Colvin was on the brief for defendant in erro
Compania de Navegacion Interior, S. A. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
COMPANIA de NAVEGACION INTERIOR, S. A., v. FIREMAN’S FUND INSURANCE COMPANY. Nos. 510 to 520, inclusive. Argued April 19, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. John D. Grace with whom Messrs. M. A. Grace and Edwin H. Grace were on the brief, for
Dugan v. Ohio
DUGAN v. OHIO. No. 766. Argued April 10, 1928. Decided May 14, 1928. Mr. F. L. Johnson, with whom Mr. Robert F. Cogswell was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. J. A. Finney, with, whom Mr. Herman E. Werner was on the brief, for defen
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.