Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1929 Cases
235 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Texas & New Orleans R. v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks
No. 469. Texas & New Orleans R. Co. et al. v. Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks et al. Messrs. H. M. Garwood and J. H. Tallichet for petitioners. Messrs. Donald R. Richberg and John'H. Crooker for respondents. December 9, 1929.
Ortega v. Magma Copper Co.
No. 429. Ortega v. Magma Copper Co. Mr. Norman B. Landreau for appellant. No appearance for appellee. Jurisdictional statement submitted December 2, 1929. Decided December 9, 1929.
First Addition to the Rattle Snake Drainage District v. Bodeman
No. 58. First Addition to the Rattle Snake Drainage District et al. v. Bodeman et al. Messrs. Charles E. Buell, Frank Lucas, H. L. Butler, and R. M. Rieser submitted for appellants. Mr. Frank W. Hall,, with whom Messrs. Wm, R. Bagley, John
Anglo & London - Paris Nat'l Bank v. Consolidated Nat'l Bank
No. 46. Anglo & London - Paris Nat’l Bank v. Consolidated Nat’l Bank. Mr. Frederic R. Coudert, with whom Mr. Mahlon B. Doing was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. John W. Davis, with whom Mr. Samuel L. Kingan was on the brief, for responden
Blind v. Brockman
No. 34. Blind et al. v. Brockman et al. Mr. Ernest F. Oakley, Jr., with whom Messrs. Edward G. Davidson and Lena Frank Oakley were on the brief, for Blind et al. Messrs. Julius T. Muench and Oliver Senti were on the brief for Brockman et al
Ex parte Hobbs
EX PARTE HOBBS, COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, et al. No. 20, Original. Argued November 25, 26, 1929. Decided December 9, 1929. Mr. John G. Egan, Assistant Attorney General of Kansas, with whom Messrs. Wm. A. Smith, Attor
Tyson v. Hartley
No. 41. Tyson v. Hartley, Governor, et al. Mr. Thomas Mannix submitted for appellant. Mr. Edward P. Donnelly, Assistant Attorney General of Washington, with whom Mr. John H. Dunbar, Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellees. Mr. J.
Morris v. Pavia
No. 487. Morris, Trustee, et al. v. Pavia. Mr. Edwin L. Garvin for petitioners. Mr. Samuel J. Rosensohn for respondent. December 2, 1929.
Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill
No. 464. Brinkerhoff-Faris Trust & Savings Co. v. Hill, Treasurer. Mr. Roy W. Rucker for petitioner. Mr. Lieutellus Cunningham for respondent. See ante, p. 550. December 2, 1929.
Jacobs v. Lucas
No. 453. Jacobs et al. v. Lucas, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Mr. David Goldsmith for petitioners. Solicitor General Hughes, Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Sewall Key, and W. Marvin Smith and Helen R. Carloss for respondent. December 2, 192
De Leon v. Ignacio
No. 396. De Leon et al. v. Ignacio. Messrs. Felix De Leon and Vincente Sotto, pro se, for petitioners. No appearance for respondent. December 2, 1929.
Richbourg Motor Co. v. United States
No. 452. Richbourg Motor Co. v. United States. Messrs. Joseph G. Myerson and R. R. Williams for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Mahlon D. Kiefer, and W. Marvin Smith for the United States. December 2, 192
Railroad Commission v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.
RAILROAD COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al. v. LOS ANGELES RAILWAY CORPORATION. No. 60. Argued October 22, 1929. Decided December 2, 1929. Mr. Arthur T. George, with whom Messrs. Ira H. Rowell and Roderick B. Cassidy' were on the brief, for th
Ex parte Northern Pacific Railway Co.
EX PARTE NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY et al. No. 21, Original. Return to rule presented November 25, 1929. Decided December 2, 1929. Messrs. Bruce Scott, H. H. Field, F. G. Dorety, M. S. Gunn, and Dennis F. Lyons were on the brief for p
Southwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. United States
No. 441. Southwestern Oil & Gas Co. v. United States. Mr. James Walton for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, apd Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Sewall Key, and Millar E. McGilchrist for the United States. November 25, 1929.
Pollock v. United States
No. 432. Pollock v. United States. Mr. John Philip Hill for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch and Barham R. Gary for the United States. November 25, 1929.
Ex parte Atwood
No. —, original. Ex parte Atwood et al. Mr. Lyman K. Clark, Jr., for petitioners. Motion submitted November 4, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929.
Bromley v. McCaughn
BROMLEY v. McCAUGHN, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 27. Argued October 31, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. . Mr. Ira Jewell Williams, with whom Messrs. Ira Jewell Williams, Jr., and Francis Skunk Brown were on the brief, for Bromley. S
Silver v. Silver
SILVER v. SILVER. No. 24. Argued October 25, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Mr. Thomas R. Robinson, with whom Messrs. David M. Reilly, Herman Levine, and Arthur B. O’Keefe were on the brief, for appellant. Messrs. David E. Fitzgerald, Wm.
Herbring v. Lee
HERBRING v. LEE, INSURANCE COMMISSIONER OF OREGON. No. 17. Argued October 23, 24, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Mr. Thomas MacMahon presented the oral argument, and Messrs. Karl Herbring, pro se, and Guy E. Kelly filed a brief for appell
Wick v. Chelan Electric Co.
WICK v. CHELAN ELECTRIC COMPANY. No. 29. Argued November 1, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Messrs. Joseph D. Sullivan and Adrien W. Vollmer for appellant. Mr. Edwin C. Matthias, with whom Messrs. F. G. Dorety, Thomas Balmer, Charles S. Al
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Mihas
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. MIHAS. No. 21. Argued October 24, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Mr. David H. Leake, with whom Mr. Wm. G. Wise was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Joseph D. Ryan, with whom Mr. John P. Bramhall was o
United States v. Erie Railroad
UNITED STATES et al. v. ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY et al. No. 30. Argued November 1, 1929 Decided November 25, 1929. Solicitor General Hughes, Assistant to the Attorney General O’Brian, and Messrs, George C. Butte and Elmer B. Collins, Special A
Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Virginia
SAFE DEPOSIT AND TRUST COMPANY OF BALTIMORE v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA. No. 20. Argued October 24, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Mr. Littleton M. Wickham, with whom Messrs. J. Jordan Leake, A. S. Buford, Jr., Wm. P. Constable, and Josep
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.