Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1929 Cases
235 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bekins Van Lines, Inc. v. Riley
BEKINS VAN LINES, INCORPORATED, et al. v. RILEY, STATE CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA. No. 13. Argued April 18, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Mr. Samuel T. Bush, with whom Mr. William Sea, Jr., was on the brief, for appellants. Mr. Frank L. Gu
Williams v. Riley
WILLIAMS et al. v. RILEY, STATE CONTROLLER OF CALIFORNIA. No. 12. Argued April 18, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Messrs. Edwin C. Ewing' and W. R. Crawford submitted for appellants. Mr. Frank L. Guerena, Deputy Attorney General of Califo
General Insurance Co. of America v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. No. 23. Argued October 25, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Mr. Ralph S. Pierce presented the oral argument, and Messrs. James B. Howe, Donald G. Graham, and James B.
Interstate Commerce Commission v. United States ex rel. Los Angeles
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. UNITED STATES ex rel. LOS ANGELES. No. 54. Argued October 28, 29, 1929. Decided November 25, 1929. Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the Interstate Commerce Commission. Messrs. Max Thelen and Jess E. Stephens, wit
Rosenwald v. Lucas
No. 430. Rosenwald v. Lucas, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Messrs. Robert N. Miller, Charles Lederer, Stuart Chevalier, and Ward Loveless for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, and Messrs. Sewall Key, Barham R. Gary, Clarence M. Char
Sweet v. United States
No. 353. Sweet, Trustee, v. United States. Mr. Theodore B. Benson for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, Assistant Attorney General Galloway, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, George H. Foster, and W. Marvin Smith.for the United States. Nove
Danovitz v. United States
No. 424. Danovitz v. United States. Messrs. John W. Dunkle and Ward Bonsall for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Howard T. Jones, and John J. Byrne for the United States. November 4, 1929.
Moe v. Aberg
No. 403. Moe et al v. Aberg et al., Trustees. Messrs. R. M. Rieser and H. L. Butler for appellants. Messrs. John W. Reynolds, Franklin E. Bump, John B. Sanborn, and Chauncey E. Blake for appellees. Jurisdictional statement submitted October
Wheeler v. Greene
WHEELER v. GREENE, RECEIVER OF THE BANKERS JOINT STOCK LAND BANK OF MILWAUKEE. No. 39. Argued October 22, 23, 1929. Decided November 4, 1929. Messrs. Floyd E. Thompson' and Joseph V. Quarles, with whom Messrs. Conrad H. Poppenhusen, Lawrenc
Colgate v. United States
COLGATE, ADMINISTRATOR, v. UNITED STATES. No. 74. Jurisdictional Statement Submitted October 14, 1929. Decided November 4, 1929. See post, p. 553. Messrs. George A. King, Louis Titus, and C. Bascom Slemp for Colgate. Solicitor General Hughe
Murray v. Monidah Trust
No. 413. Murray et al. v. Monidah Trust et al. Messrs. Alfred Lucking, William Lucking, and Nat Schmulowitz for petitioners. Mr. Edward I. Barry for respondents. October 28, 1929.
King v. United States
No. 70. King v. United States. Messrs. Clarence Wood, S. X. Christensen, and Leon J. Dugan were on the brief for petitioner. Assistant Attorney General Sisson, with whom Solicitor General Hughes, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, Mr. Geor
Vinyard v. North Side Canal Co.
No. 341. Vinyard et al. v. North Side Canal Co. et al. Mr. James B. Eldridge for appellants. Mr. E. A. Walters for appellees. Jurisdictional statement submitted October 14, 1929. Decided October 28, 1929.
Booth v. Clapp
No. 169. Booth et al. v. Clapp et al. Mr. Jonathan Taylor for appellants. No appearance for appellees. Jurisdictional, statement submitted October 14, 1929. Decided October 28, 1929.
Muselin v. Pennsylvania
No. 294. No. 295. No. 296. Muselin v. Pennsylvania; Zima v. Same; and Resetar v. Same. Mr. Thomas M. Henry for appellants. Mr. John G. Frazer for appellee. Jurisdictional statements submitted October 14, 1929. Decided October 28, 1929.
Tremont Lumber Co. v. Police Jury
No. 183. Tremont Lumber Co. v. Police Jury of the Parish of Winn et al. Mr. John C. Them for appellant. No appearance for appellees. Jurisdictional statement submitted October 14, 1929. Decided October 28, 1929.
Harrington v. Sloan
No. 90. Harrington et al. v. Sloan. Messrs. Wymer Dressier and Robert D. Neely for appellants. Messrs. J. A. C. Kennedy and Charles L. McLaughlin for appellee. Jurisdictional statement submitted October 14, 1929. Decided October 28, 1929.
Bamsey v. Iowa
No. 404. Bamsey v. Iowa. Mr. Frank Wisdom for petitioner. Messrs. John Fletcher and Neill Garrett for respondent. October 21, 1929.
Applybe v. United States
No. 394. Applybe et al. v. United States. Mr. Harold C. Faulkner for petitioners. Solicitor General 'Hughes, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, John J. Byrne, John F. Coldiron, and W. Marvin Smith for the United States. October 21, 1929.
Pittsburgh & West Virginia R. Co. v. Wheeling & Lake Erie R.
No. 401. Pittsburgh & West Virginia R. Co. v. Wheeling & Lake Erie R. Co. et al. Mr. C. F. Taplin for petitioner. Messrs. Wm. H. Boyd, Andrew P. Martin, H. H. McKeehan, and George W. Cottrell for respondents. October 21, 1929.
North River Ins. v. Becnel
No. 380. North River Ins. Co. v. Becnel et al. Mr. Walker B. Spencer for petitioner. Mr. A. A. Moreno for respondents. October 21, 1929.
Uniform Printing & Supply Co. v. Lucas
No. 369. Uniform Printing & Supply Co. v. Lucas, Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Mr. Walter H. Eckert for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Sewall Key, and Barham R. Gary for respondent. October 21, 1929.
Federal Electric Co. v. Flexlume Corp.
No. 361. No. 362. Federal Electric Co., Inc., v. Flexlume Corp'n; and Chicago Miniature Lamp Works et al. v. Same. Messrs. Clarence E. Mehlhope and Drury W. Cooper fór petitioners. Messrs. Wallace R. Lane and John S. Powers for respondent.
Leikin v. United States
No. 355. Leikin et al. v. United States. Mr. George W. Cameron for petitioners. Solicitor General Hughes, Assistant Attorney General Luhring, and Messrs. Claude R. Branch and Harry S. Ridgely for the United States. October 21, 1929.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.