Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1930 Cases
326 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Carley & Hamilton, Inc. v. Snook Chief of the Division of Motor Vehicles
CARLEY & HAMILTON, INC., et al. v. SNOOK CHIEF OF THE DIVISION OF MOTOR VEHICLES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. COTTINGHAM et al. v. SAME. Nos. 86 and 267. Submitted January 9, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Messrs. W. R. Crawford and Edwin C. Ewi
Illinois Central Railroad v. Crail
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. CRAIL, DOING BUSINESS AS P. McCOY FUEL COMPANY. No. 75. Argued January 10, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. See also 2 F. (2d) 287; 13 id. 459. Mr. Edward C. Craig, with whom Messrs. Edwin C. Brown and R
Collie v. Fergusson
COLLIE et al. v. FERGUSSON et al. No. 423. Argued January 13, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Jacob L. Morewitz, with whom Mr. Percy Carmel was on the brief, for petitioners. Messrs. Leon T. Seawell and Henry Bowden, with whom Messrs.
District of Columbia v. Fred
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. FRED. No. 229. Argued January 24, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Richmond B. Keech, Assistant Corporation Counsel, District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. William W. Bride, Corporation Counsel, and Edward W. Th
Lindgren v. United States
LINDGREN, ADMINISTRATOR, v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 25. Argued October 25, 28, 1929. Decided February 24, 1930. Messrs. D. Arthur Kelsey, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, and Jacob L. Morewitz, with whom Messrs. L. B. Cox and R. Ar
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Guenther
UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY v. GUENTHER. No. 179. Argued January 23, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Clinton M. Horn, with whom Mr. Fred J. Perkins was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. William M. Byrnes, with whom Messrs
District of Columbia v. Thompson
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. THOMPSON. No. 44. Argued December 4, 1929. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Alexander H. Bell, Jr., Assistant Corporation Counsel, with whom Mr. William W. Bride, Corporation Counsel, District of Columbia, was on the b
Moore v. Mitchell
MOORE, TREASURER OF GRANT COUNTY, INDIANA, v. MITCHELL, et al., EXECUTORS. No. 79. Argued January 14, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Henry M. Dowling, with whom Mr. Bussell H. Robbins was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Louis Connic
Chicago & North Western Railway Co. v. Lindell
CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. LINDELL. No. 193. Argued January 23, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Nelson Trottman, with whom Messrs. Samuel H. Cady and Aaron M. Sargent were on the brief, for the Chicago & North Western R
Lucas v. North Texas Lumber Co.
LUCAS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. NORTH TEXAS LUMBER COMPANY. No. 92. Argued January 15, 16, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Solicitor General Hughes, with whom Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Messrs. Randolph C. Shaw and
Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. Guardian Trust Co.
KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY et al. No. 22. Argued January 15, 16, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. See also 210 Fed. 696; 240 U. S. 166; 146 Fed. 337; 171 id. 43. Mr. Samuel W. Moore, with whom Messrs. Fra
White v. Sparkill Realty Corp.
WHITE et al. v. SPARKILL REALTY CORPORATION et al. No. 336. Argued January 7, .1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Walter H. Poliak, with whom James Gibson, Second Assistant Attorney General of New York, Carl S. Stem and Ruth I. Wilson wer
Early v. Richardson
EARLY, RECEIVER, v. RICHARDSON. No. 133. Argued January 21, 22, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. B. E. Whiting, with whom Mr. D. E. Ellerbe was on the brief, for Early. • Mr. A. C. Hinds, with whom Mr. H. E. Davis was. on the brief, for
Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. Carroll
BALTIMORE & OHIO SOUTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. CARROLL, ADMINISTRATRIX. No. 87. Argued January 15, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. William A. Eggers, with whom Messrs. Morison B. Waite, Harry B. McMullen and Cassius W. McMullen were
New York Central Railroad v. Ambrose
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. AMBROSE, ADMINISTRATRIX. No. 73. Argued January 10, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. William H. Carey argued the cause, and Messrs. Albert C. Wall and John A. Hartpence were on the brief, for petitio
United States v. Guaranty Trust Co.
UNITED STATES v. GUARANTY TRUST COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al. No. 402. Argued January 6, 7, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Assistant to the Attorney General O’Brian, with whom Solicitor General Hughes and Messrs. Claude R. Branch, Charles H.
Piedmont & Northern Ry. Co. v. United States
PIEDMONT & NORTHERN RY. CO. et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 164. Argued January 22, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Messrs. Charles E. Hughes, Cameron Morrison,, H. J. Haynsworth, and W. S. O’B. Robinson, Jr., on behalf of the Piedmont
Florsheim Bros. Drygoods Co. v. United States
FLORSHEIM BROTHERS DRYGOODS COMPANY, LTD., v. UNITED STATES. WHITE, COLLECTOR, v. HOOD RUBBER CO. Nos. 118 and 414. Argued January 13, 14, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. James Craig Peacobk, with whom Messrs. Allen Rendall, A. B. Frey
Lucas v. American Code Co.
LUCAS, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. AMERICAN CODE COMPANY, INC. No. 67. Argued January 8, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Solicitor General Hughes, with whom Attorney General Mitchell, Assistant Attorney General Willebrandt, Messrs
Tagg Bros. & Moorhead v. United States
TAGG BROS. & MOORHEAD et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 45. Argued .October 23, 1929. Decided February 24, 1930. Messrs. Francis A. Brogan and James M. Beck, with whom Messrs. Alfred G. Ellick, Anan Raymond, J. 8. Boyd, and Challen B. Elli
United States v. American Can Co.
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN CAN COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. MISSOURI CAN COMPANY. UNITED STATES v. DETROIT CAN COMPANY. Nos. 128; 129, 130. Argued January 21, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. See also, Aluminum Castings Co. v. Routzahn, 31 F. (
Cooper v. United States
COOPER v. UNITED STATES. No. 93. Argued January 15, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. Wayne Johnson for petitioner. Solicitor General Hughes, with whom Assistant Attorneys General Youngquist and Galloway, Messrs. Sewall Key, J. Louis Mon
Davis v. Preston
DAVIS, FEDERAL AGENT, et al. v. PRESTON, ADMINISTRATRIX. No. 188. Argued January 23, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. W. L. Cook, with whom Mr. Sidney F. Andrews was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Robert L. Cole, with whom Mr. James
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Bryant
CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. BRYANT, ADMINISTRATOR. No. 113. Argued January 16, 17, 1930. Decided February 24, 1930. Mr. J. M. Perry for petitioner. Mr. Charles Curry, with whom Messrs. R. B. Stephenson and Curry Carter were on the
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.