Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1941 Cases
431 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Roeser & Pendleton, Inc. v. Commissioner
No. 191. Roeser & Pendleton, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. October 13, 1941. Mr. George Thompson, Jr. for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. J. Louis Monarch and Joseph M.
Estate of Wilder v. Commissioner
No. 135. Estate of Wilder v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. October 13, 1941. Mr. W. W. Spalding for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key, Arnold Ramn, and Joseph M. Jones
Hemler v. Hope Producing Co.
No. 127. Hemler v. Hope Producing Co. October 13, 1941. Mr. G. P. Bullís for petitioner. Mr. Henry P. Dart, Jr. for respondent.
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Mistrot
No. 116. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. Mistrot. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Frederic D. McKenney, John 8. Flannery, G. Bow-doin Craighill, R. Aubrey Bogley, and E. B. Dubuisson for petitioner. Mr. Wade 0. Martin, Jr. for respondent.
Burdick v. Commissioner
No. 109. Burdick et al., Trustees, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Dallas 8. Townsend and Gardner D. Howie for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewal
M. Jacobson & Sons Trust v. Bomeisler
No. 93. M. Jacobson & Sons Trust v. Bomeisler et al. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Francis P. Garland and Frank P. Ryan for petitioner. Mr. Marcien Jenckes for respondents.
Coca-Cola Co. v. Dixie-Cola Laboratories, Inc.
No. 87. Coca-Cola Company v. Dixie-Cola Laboratories, Inc., et al. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Harry D. Nims and Edward S. Rogers for petitioner. Mr. W. Hamilton Whitejord for respondents.
Lewis v. Illinois
No. 77. Lewis v. Illinois. October 13, 1941. Mr. Ode L. Rankin for petitioner. Messrs. George F. Barrett, Attorney General of Illinois, and Thomas J. Courtney for respondent.
Hemphill v. United States
No. 525. Hemphill v. United States. October 13, 1941. Mr. Melville Monheimer for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and Louis B. Schwartz for the United States.
Harvey Coal Corp. v. United States
No. 355. Harvey Coal Corp. v. United States. October 13, 1941. Mr. 3. Nelson Anderson for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Miss Helen B. Carloss and Mr. William L. Cary for the United State
Pike v. Walker
No. 285. Pike et al. v. Walker, Postmaster General, et al. October 13, 1941. Mr. Horace J. Donnelly, Jr. for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost for respondents.
United States ex rel. Fletcher v. Fahey
No. 226. United States ex rel. Fletcher v. Fahey et al. October 13, 1941. Edmond C. Fletcher, pro se. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney, Harold Lee, E. K. Neumann, and Neil Thomps
Simon v. United States
No. 193. Simon v. United States. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Arthur Garfield Hays and Sidney Struble for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost for the United States.
Pelley v. Colpoys
No. 150. Pelley v. Colpoys, U. S. Marshal. October 13, 1941. Mr. T. Edward O’Connell for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost and Edward M. Curran for respondent.
Pirtle v. Brown
No. 117. Pirtle v. Brown et al., Judges of Election, et al. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Cramp-ton Harris and Lee Pressman for petitioner. Messrs. Nat Tipton and W. F. Barry for respondents.
Katzberg v. United States
No. 97. Katzberg et al. v. United States. October 13, 1941. Mr. David Stockier for petitioners. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Melvin H. Siegel for the United States.
Crockett v. United States
No. 65. No. 66. Crockett v. United States; and Crockett v. McElroy et al. October 13, 1941. Messrs. Joseph M. Sanders and Oliver M. Loomis for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Melvin H. Siegel f
Detroit Edison Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission
No. 349. Detroit Edison Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission. October 13, 1941. Messrs. John Foster Dulles and Oscar C. Hull for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Arnold Raum, Chester T. Lane, Christopher M. Jenks,
Leche v. United States
No. 169. Leche v. United States. October 13, 1941. Mr. Martin W. Littleton, Jr. for petitioner. Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Oscar A. Provost, Louis B. Schwartz, and W. Marvin Smith for the
Bailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
No. 217. Bailey v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. October 13, 1941. Mr. John F. Reilly for petitioner. Messrs. Stephen H. Philbin and Clyde A. Norton for respondent.
Identification Devices, Inc. v. United States
No. 108. Identification Devices, Inc. v. United States. October 13, 1941. James M. Rulong, pro se.
Farren v. Mahoney
No. 546. Farren v. Mahoney, Acting Warden. October 13, 1941. Patrick Farren, pro se.
Fenzel v. Fensterwald
No. 345. Fenzel, Trustee, v. Fensterwald et al. October 13, 1941. Maud L. Fenzel, pro se.
Willey v. Maine Central Railroad
No. 235. Willey et al. v. Maine Central Railroad Co. October 13, 1941. Mr. Henry F. Butler for petitioners. Mr. Edward W. Wheeler for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.