Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1941 Cases
431 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Payne Furnace & Supply Co. v. Williams-Wallace Co.
No. 893. Payne Furnace & Supply Co., Inc. v. Williams-Wallace Company. May 26, 1941.
Augustus v. Commissioner
No. 819. Augustus v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. May 26, 1941. Messrs. Orville Smith and Erwin N: Griswold for petitioner. ■ Solicitor General Biddle for respondent.
Potash v. United States
No. 989. Potash et al. v. United States. May 26, 1941. Mr. Kenneth E. Walser for petitioners. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr. Oscar A. Provost for the United States.
Bowen v. New York Life Insurance
No. 979. Bowen v. New York Life Insurance Co. May 26, 1941. Mr. J. L. London for petitioner.
Kettleman Hills Royalty Syndicate No. 1 v. Commissioner
No. 958. Kettleman Hills Royalty Syndicate No. 1 v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. May 26, 1941. Mr. Robert Holland Eckhoff for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and William L.
Collins v. Mosher
No. 943. No. 944. Collins v. Mosher et al.; and Lount v. Mosher et al. May 26, 1941. Mr. John J. McCullough for petitioners. Mr. J. L. Gust for respondents.
Lane v. Haytian Corp. of America
No. 973. Lane et al. v. Haytian Corporation of America. May 26, 1941. Mr. Sydney Krause for petitioners. Mr. Henry M. Wise for respondent.
Superior Court of California v. Caminetti
No. 950. Superior Court of California v. Caminetti, Insurance Commissioner. May 26, 1941. Mr. U. S. Webb and Hester Webb for petitioner.
Nalder v. Federal Land Bank
No. 914. Nalder v. Federal Land Bank of Berkeley et al. May 26, 1941. Mr. J. D. Skeen for petitioner. Solicitor General Biddle and Messrs. Thomas E. Harris and Robert. K. McCon-naughey for respondents.
Philbrook v. United States
No. 939. Philbrook et al. v. United States. May 26, 1941. Mr. Eugene D. O’Sullivan for petitioners.
District of Columbia v. Murphy
No. 991. No. 992. District of Columbia v. Murphy; and District of Columbia v. DeHart. May 26, 1941. Messrs. Richmond B. Keech, Vernon E. West, and Glenn Simmon for petitioner. Mr. Harry Raymond Turkel for respondents.
Pink v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc.
No. 932. Pink, Superintendent of Insurance, v. A. A. A. Highway Express, Inc., et al. May 26, 1941. Messrs. M. F. Goldstein, Alfred C. Bennett, and Arthur G. Powell for petitioner. Messrs.. Allen Post, A. O. B. Sparks,.and T. Baldwin Martin
Ex parte Williams
No. —. No. —. Ex parte Charles N. Williams; and Ex parte Joseph Poresky. May 26, 1941.
United States v. A. S. Kreider Co.
UNITED STATES v. A. S. KREIDER CO. No. 853. Argued May 7, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. Arnold Raum, with whom Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Mr. Sewull Key and Miss Helen R. Carloss were on the br
Cary v. Commissioner
CARY v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE. No. 734. Argued May 1, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. Boswell L. GiVpatric, with whom Mr. Joseph C. White was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Thomas I. Emerson, with whom Solicitor General Biddl
Helvering v. Reynolds
HELVERING, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. REYNOLDS. No. 684. Argued April 30, May 1, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. Thomas I. Emerson, with whom Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Clark, and Messrs. Sewall Key and N
United States v. Morgan
UNITED STATES et al. v. MORGAN, ADMINISTRATRIX, et al. No. 640. Argued April 10, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Attorney General Jackson, with whom Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Hugh B. Cox, Warner W. Gardner, James C. Wilson,
Marsh v. Buck
MARSH, SECRETARY OF STATE OF NEBRASKA, et al. v. BUCK et al. No. 312. Argued April 29, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. William J. Hotz, with whom Messrs. Walter R. Johnson, Attorney General of Nebraska, John Riddell, Assistant Attorney Gene
Watson v. Buck
WATSON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF FLORIDA, et al. v. BUCK et al. No. 610. Argued April 29, 30, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Messrs. Thomas G. Haight and Frank J. Wideman, with whom Messrs. Louis D. Frohlich, Herman Finkel-stein, and Manley P. Cald
Wood v. Lovett
WOOD et al. v. LOVETT. No. 709. Submitted April 2, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. J. G. Burke submitted for appellants. Mr. Walter G. Riddick submitted for appellee.
Brooks v. Dewar
BROOKS v. DEWAR et al. No. 718. Argued May 1, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. Warner W. Gardner, with whom Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Littell, and Mr. Vernon L. Wilkinson were on the brief, for petitioner. . Mr. Mi
Holiday v. Johnston
HOLIDAY v. JOHNSTON, WARDEN. No. 14, original. Argued May 5, 6, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. Charles A. Horsky for petitioner. Mr. Herbert Wechsler, with whom Assistant Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Mr: Al
United States v. Classic
UNITED STATES v. CLASSIC et al. No. 618. Argued April 7, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. Herbert Wechsler, with whom Solicitor General Biddle, Assistant Attorney General Berge, and Messrs. Warner■ W. Gardner, Alfred'B. Teton, Bene A. Viosca
Royal Indemnity Co. v. United States
ROYAL INDEMNITY CO. v. UNITED STATES. No. 817. Argued May 7, 1941. Decided May 26, 1941. Mr. Harry S. Hall, with, whom Mr. Nathaniel E. Wheeler was on the brief, for petitioner; Mr. Edward J. Ennis, with whom Assistant Solicitor General Fah
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.