Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1944 Cases
404 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Dixon
No. —, October Term, 1943. Ex parte Allen Dixon. October 9, 1944.
Miner v. Ragen
No. 284. Miner v. Ragen, Warden. October 9, 1944.
Brown v. Ragen
No. 199. No. 249. No. 250. No. 258. No. 327. No. 366. No. 375. Brown v. Ragen, Warden; Buckhalter v. Ragen, Warden; Turner v. Ragen, Warden; Wood v. Ragen, Warden; Parker v. Ragen, Warden; Fife v. Ragen, Warden; and Schroers v. Nierstheimer
Duncan v. Ragen
No. 389. Duncan v. Ragen, Warden. October 9, 1944.
Maloney v. Missouri
No. 306. Maloney v. Missouri. October 9, 1944.
Ravenscroft v. Casey
No. 282. Ravenscroft v. Casey et al. October 9, 1944. Lillian E. Ravenscroft, pro se. Messrs. William A. Davidson and Francis J. Morgan for respondents.
Way v. Nierstheimer
No. 236. Way v. Nierstheimer, Warden. October 9, 1944.
Audett v. Johnston
No. 190. Audett v. Johnston, Warden. October 9, 1944. Theodore James Audett, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Messrs. Robert S. Erdahl and Leon Giman for respondent.
Webb v. Ragen
No. 158. Webb v. Ragen, Warden. October 9, 1944.
Minnesota v. Trustees of Hamline University
Nos. 358 and 359. Minnesota v. Trustees of Hamline University. October 9, 1944. Mr. Frank J. Williams for petitioner in No. 358, and Messrs. James F. Lynch and Andrew R. Bratter for petitioner in No. 359. Messrs. G.A. Youngquist, D. E. Brid
Baker v. Hunter
No. 151. Baker v. Hunter, Warden. October 9, 1944. Messrs. A. G. Bush and James J. Laughlin for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy for respondent.
Denicke v. Anglo California National Bank
No. 155. No. 196. No. 197. Denicke et al. v. Anglo California National Bank et al.; Denicke v. Brigham et al.; and Doble v. Buck et al. October 9, 1944. Messrs. Allen L. Chickering, Walter C. Fox, Jr., and Vincent I. Compagno for Anglo Cali
Borak v. Biddle
No. 135. Borak v. Biddle, Attorney General. October 9, 1944. Stanley H. Borak, pro se. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Mr. Joseph B. Goldman for respondent.
Groesbeck v. Goldstein
No. 101. Groesbeck et al. v. Goldstein. October 9, 1944. Messrs. John F. MacLane, Louis Connick, and Whitney North Seymour for petitioners. Mr. Nathan Witt for respondent. Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Chester T. Lane and Roger S. Fost
McGrew v. Harbison
No. 383. No. 384. McGrew v. Harbison; and McGrew v. Simmons. October 9, 1944.
Albright v. Pennsylvania Railroad
No. 348. Albright v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. October 9, 1944. Messrs. Paul Berman and Hamilton O’Dunne for petitioner. Mr. Edward E. Hargest, Jr. for respondent.
Hutchinson v. Board of Education
No. 332. Hutchinson et al. v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al. October 9, 1944. Mr. Floyd E. Thompson for petitioners. Messrs. Richard 8. Folsom, Frank 8. Righeimer, and Frank R. Schneberger for respondents.
Kieferdorf v. Commissioner
No. 325. Kieferdorf v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. October 9, 1944. Mr. G. D. Schilling for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Messrs. Sewall Key, Walter J. Cummings, Jr., Miss Helen R
Rockefeller v. Commissioner
No. 317. Rockefeller v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. October 9, 1944. Mr. Louis Laval Hamby for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Mr. Sewall Key, and Miss Helen Carloss for respondent.
Texas v. Tabasco Consolidated Independent School District
No. 309. Texas et al. v. Tabasco Consolidated Independent School District. October 9, 1944. Messrs. Grover Sellers, Attorney General of Texas, Gaynor Kendall and Geo. W. Barcus, Assistant Attorneys General, for petitioners.
Peyton Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 298. Peyton Packing Co., Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. October 9, 1944. Mr. Eugene T. Edwards for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Mr. Alvin J. Rockwell, and Miss Ruth Weyand for respondent.
Smith v. United States
No. 289. Smith v. United States. October 9, 1944. Messrs. Charles P. Moriarity and Stanley J. Padden for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Tom C. Clark, and Mr. Leon Ulman for the United States.
Compania Trasatlantica v. Manuel Arnus
No. 278. Compania Trasatlantica (formerly Compania Trasatlantica Administrada por el Estado) v. The Manuel Arnus et al. October 9, 1944. Mr. Geo. Whitefield Betts, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea,
Bankers Mortgage Co. v. Commissioner
No. 267. Bankers Mortgage Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. October 9, 1944. Mr. Wright Matthews for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Samuel O. Clark, Jr., and Messrs. Sewall Key and Robert N. Anderson f
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.