Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1948 Cases
336 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Kruszewski
No. 526. United States v. Kruszewski. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. Julius L. Kabaker for respondent.
Illinois v. Wisconsin
No. —, Original. Illinois v. Wisconsin et al. Massachusetts v. Missouri, 308 U. S. 1. George F. Barrett, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for complainant. John E. Martin, Attorney General of Wi
Anderson v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
ANDERSON, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY CO. No. 620. Decided April 26, 1948. Clifton Hildebrand filed a brief for petitioner. Frank B. Belcher filed a brief for respondent.
United States v. Scophony Corp. of America
UNITED STATES v. SCOPHONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al. No. 41. Argued January 12-13, 1948. Decided April 26, 1948. Sigmund Timberg argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Atto
United States v. South Buffalo Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. SOUTH BUFFALO RAILWAY CO. et al. No. 198. Argued February 2, 1948. Decided April 26, 1948. Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Assistant Attorney General Sonnett, Rob
Andres v. United States
ANDRES v. UNITED STATES. No. 431. Argued February 5, 1948. Decided April 26, 1948. O. P. Soares argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Vincent A. Kleinfeld argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solic
Federal Trade Commission v. Cement Institute
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v. CEMENT INSTITUTE et al. NO. 23. Argued October 20-21,1947. Decided April 26, 1948. Charles H. Weston and Walter B. Wooden argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, As
King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America
No. 171. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America,
Eason v. Turner
No. 376, Misc. Eason v. Turner, Warden.
Gahagan Construction Corp. v. Armao
No. 673. Gahagan Construction Corp. v. Armao. Paul R. Frederick for petitioner. Samuel B. Horovitz for respondent.
Herren v. Farm Security Administration
No. 662. Herren v. Farm Security Administration, Department of Agriculture. DuVal L. Purkins for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney, Harry I. Rand and Melvin Richter for respondent.
Edgerton v. Kingsland
No. 652. Edgerton v. Kingsland, Commissioner of Patents. David Riñes and Frank W. Dahn for petitioner. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Paul A. Sweeney, Alvin O. West and W. W. Cochran for respondent.
Frazier v. United States
No. 213, Misc. Frazier v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Josephine H. Klein for the United States.
Ex parte Kasper
No. 339, Misc. Ex parte Kasper.
McCann v. Clark
No. 266, Misc. McCann v. Clark, Attorney General, et al. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for respondents.
Bute v. Illinois
BUTE v. ILLINOIS. No. 398. Argued February 12, 1948. Decided April 19, 1948. Victor Brudney argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With h
Massachusetts v. United States
MASSACHUSETTS et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 157. Argued December 10, 1947. Decided April 19, 1948. Alfred E. LoPresti, Assistant Attorney General of Massachusetts, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Clarence A. Barn
General Motors Corp. v. Kesling
No. 558. General Motors Corp. v. Kesling,
Howell v. Ragen
No. 353, Misc. Howell v. Ragen, Warden.
Estate of Collins v. Commissioner
No. 627. Estate of Collins et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Weston Vernon, Jr. for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Sewall Key and Melva M. Graney for respondent.
Lovelady v. Texas
No. 415, Misc. Lovelady v. Texas. Sam W. Davis for petitioner.
Penn v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.
No. 600. Penn v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. Royal W. Irwin for petitioner. Lowell Hastings for respondent.
Commissioner v. Sunnen
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SUNNEN. No. 227. Argued December 17, 1947. Decided April 5, 1948. Arnold Raum argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Hele
Shade v. Downing
SHADE v. DOWNING et al. No. 448. Argued February 11, 1948. Decided April 5, 1948. Kelly Brown argued the cause for Shade, urging an affirmative answer. Forrester Brewster argued the cause for Downing et ah, urging a negative answer.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.