Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1948 Cases
336 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Parker v. Illinois
PARKER v. ILLINOIS. No. 270. Argued February 13, 1948. Decided April 5, 1948. Petitioner argued the cause and filed a brief pro se. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the b
Ohio Oil Co. v. United States
No. 516. Ohio Oil Co. v. United States,
O'Connell v. United States
No. 625. O'Connell et al. v. United States. Sol Gelb and Herbert Zelenko for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Philip R. Monahan for the United States.
Matlaw Corp. v. War Damage Corp.
No. 624. Matlaw Corporation v. War Damage Corporation. James E. Watson, Orin deM. Walker, Walter Myers, Jr. and Jay E. Darlington for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, H. G. Morison and Paul A. Sweeney for respondent.
Bangs v. Fogel
No. 601. Bangs, Trustee, v. Fogel. U. S. Lesh for petitioner.
Garland v. United States
No. 579. Garland v. United States. Henry Klepak for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Son-nett, Edward Dumbauld and James A. Murray for the United States.
National Mutual Insurance v. Tidewater Transfer Co.
No. 640. National Mutual Insurance Co. v. Tidewater Transfer Co., Inc. Alvin L. Newmyer, David O. Bress and Sheldon E. Bernstein for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman filed a brief for the United States, as amicus curiae, urging that th
Davis v. Beeler
No. 636. Davis et al. v. Beeler, Attorney General, et al. Weldon B. White for appellants. Nat Tipton for appellees.
Moore v. New York
MOORE et al. v. NEW YORK. No. 485. Argued February 12, 1948. Decided March 29, 1948. John F. Wilkinson argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief was Isidore Ehrman. George Tilzer argued the cause for respondent. With him on th
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Moore
CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO. et al. v. MOORE, COMPTROLLER OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 337. Argued December 19, 1947. Decided March 29, 1948. Ganson J. Baldwin and Buist Murfee Anderson argued the cause and filed a brief for appel
Winters v. New York
WINTERS v. NEW YORK. No. 3. Argued March 27, 1946. Reargued November 19, 1946. Reargued November 10,1947. Decided March 29, 1948. Arthur N. Seiff argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant. With him on the original argument and the
Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SOUTH TEXAS LUMBER CO. No. 384. Argued January 14, 1948. Decided March 29, 1948. Lee A. Jackson argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney Ge
Carr v. Martin
No. 336, Misc. Carr v. Martin, Warden.
Richetsky v. New York
No. 198, Misc. Richetsky v. New York.
Trust Co. of Georgia v. Allen
No. 578. Trust Company of Georgia, Successor Trustee, v. Allen, Collector of Internal Revenue. Dan MacDougald and Robert S. Sams for petitioner. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Caudle, Sewall Key, Lee A. Jackson and M
General Motors Corp. v. Kesling
No. 558. General Motors Corp. v. Kesling. Horace Dawson, Casper W. Ooms, Edwin S. Booth and Joseph J. Gravely for petitioner. Edmund C. Rogers and Estill E. Ezell for respondent.
Hunter v. Martin
No. 643. Hunter, Warden, v. Martin. Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner.
Takahashi v. Fish & Game Commission
No. 533. Takahashi v. Fish and Game Commission et al. A. L. Wirin, Dean Acheson, Charles A. Horsky, Saburo Kido and Fred Okrand for petitioner. Fred N. Howser, Attorney General of California, for respondents. Briefs of amici curiae in suppo
King v. Priest
No. 630. King et al. v. Priest et al. S. D. Flanagan and E. D. Franey for appellants. J. C. Taylor, Attorney General of Missouri, for appellees.
Brunson v. North Carolina
March 15, 1948. No. 292. No. 293. No. 294. No. 295. No. 296. Brunson v. North Carolina; King v. North Carolina; Jones v. North Carolina; James et al. v. North Carolina; and Watkins et al. v. North Carolina. Argued February 3, 1948. Decided
United States v. Evans
UNITED STATES v. EVANS. No. 15. Argued February 3, 1948. Decided March 15, 1948. David Reich argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were George T. Washington, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General
Woods v. Stone
WOODS, HOUSING EXPEDITER, v. STONE. No. 392. Argued February 4, 1948. Decided March 15, 1948. Stanley M. Silverberg argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Irving M. Gruber and Ed Dupree. James
Francis v. Southern Pacific Co.
FRANCIS et al. v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC CO. No. 400. Argued February 5, 1948. Decided March 15, 1948. Parnell Black argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Calvin W. Rawlings and Harold E. Wallace. Paul H. Ray argued the cau
Bakery Sales Drivers Local Union No. 33 v. Wagshal
BAKERY SALES DRIVERS LOCAL UNION NO. 33 et al. v. WAGSHAL, trading as WAGSHAL’S DELICATESSEN. No. 225. Argued December 17-18, 1947. Decided March 15, 1948. Herbert S. Thatcher argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were J.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.