Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1948 Cases
336 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gray v. United States
No. 554, Mise., October Term, 1947. Gray v. United States,
Wilson v. Illinois
No. 447, Mise., October Term, 1947. Wilson v. Illinois,
Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. Aaron
No. 366, No. 367, October Term, 1947. October Term, 1947. Bay Ridge Operating Co., Inc. v. Aaron et al., Huron Stevedoring Corp. v. Blue et al.,
Alexander Wool Combing Co. v. United States
No. 95, October Term, 1947. Alexander Wool Combing Co. v. United States,
Merrymood v. Ragen
No. 105, Mise. Merrymood v. Ragen, Warden.
Frazier v. Ragen
No. 82, Mise. Frazier v. Ragen, Warden.
Sanner v. Maryland
No. 65, Misc. Sanner v. Maryland.
Townsend v. Duffy
No. 45, Misc. Townsend v. Duffy, Warden.
Blaha v. Ragen
No. 31, Misc. Blaha v. Ragen, Warden.
Touhy v. Ragen
No. 14, Misc. Touhy v. Ragen, Warden.
Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Smith
No. 155. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Smith. Harlan Hobart Grooms for petitioner. James A. Simpson for respondent.
Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Tape Corp.
No. 230. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Industrial Tape Corp. George I. Haight, Harold J. Kinney and M. K. Hobbs for petitioner. Drury W. Cooper for respondent.
United Services Life Insurance v. Boye
No. 216. United Services Life Insurance Co. v. Boye et al. Neil Bur-kinshaw for petitioner. Thomas M. Raysor for respondents.
Paris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
No. 203. Paris et al. v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. et al. Louis B. Boudin for petitioners. Burton A. Zorn and Eugene Eisenmann for the Metropolitan Life Insurance Co., respondent.
Hart v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance
No. 186. Hart et al. v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Co. Lawrence R. Condon for petitioners. James M. Snee for respondent.
United States v. Silliman
No. 174. United States v. Silliman. Solicitor General Perlman for the United States. Frederic M. P. Pearse, Sherwood D. Sil-liman and Reuben D. Silliman for respondent.
Johnson v. Smith
No. 166. Johnson et al. v. Smith, County Treasurer, et al. Harold J. Hinman for petitioners. Neile F. Towner and Robert E. Whalen for Smith, County Treasurer; and Jack Goodman for Sandler et al., respondents.
Pacific Coast Wholesalers Ass'n v. Clover Leaf Freight Lines, Inc.
No. 159. Pacific Coast Wholesalers Association v. Clover Leaf Freight Lines, Inc. et al. David J. Shipman for petitioner. J. Glenn Shehee for respondents.
Texas State Life Insurance v. Houghton
No. 146. Texas State Life Insurance Co. et al. v. Houghton. O. M. Street for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Samuel D. Slade and Morton Liftin for respondent.
Nemours v. Hickey
No. 139. Nemours v. Hickey et al. /. L. London for petitioner.
Fitzsimmons v. Michigan
No. 131. Fitzsimmons v. Michigan. Eugene L. Garey, Wm. Henry Gallagher and Abraham Hornstein for petitioner. Eugene F. Black, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorney General,
Reagon v. D'Antonio
No. 122. Reagon v. D’Antonio. Lewis R. Graham for petitioner. Moses C. Scharff for respondent.
Gentry v. North Carolina
No. 112. Gentry v. North Carolina. W. H. Strickland for petitioner. Harry McMullan, Attorney General of North Carolina, T. W. Bruton and Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorneys General, for respondent.
McElroy v. Pegg
No. 99. McElroy v. Pegg et al. James W. Bounds for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Vanech and Roger P. Marquis for the United States; and Jeff Bushy for Pegg et al., respondents.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.