Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1948 Cases
336 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Burns v. Illinois
No. 570, Misc. Burns v. Illinois.
Jones v. Missouri
No. 556, Misc. Jones v. Missouri.
Peters v. United States
No. 256. Peters v. United States. Norman L. Meyers for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Philip Elman, Robert S Erdahl and Irving S. Shapiro for the United States.
Ott v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.
Nos. 818 and 823. Nos. 819 and 825. Nos. 820 and 822. Nos. 821 and 826. No. 824. Henry B. Curtis for petitioners. Arthur A. Moreno for respondents. Ott, Commissioner of Public Finance, v. Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co.; Montgomery, State
Marzani v. United States
No. 816. Marzani v. United States. Osmond K. Fraenkel and Allan R. Rosenberg for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Irving 8. Shapiro for the United States.
Shotkin v. Kaplan
No. 561, Mise. Shotkin v. Kaplan et al.
Woods v. Hills
No. 437. Woods, Housing Expediter, v. Hills.
Wisconsin v. Illinois
No. —, Original. Wisconsin v. Illinois. John E. Martin, Attorney General of Wisconsin, and George I. Haight for complainant. George F. Barrett, Attorney General of Illinois, and William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant.
Hilliard v. United States
No. 320, Misc. Hilliard v. United States.
Farnsworth v. Maryland
No. 542, Misc. Farnsworth v. Maryland.
McElligott v. Burke
No. 530, Misc. McElligott v. Burke, Warden.
Cole v. New Jersey
No. 500, Misc. Cole et al. v. New Jersey. David W. Louisell, Carl McGowan, A. Warren Littman and Henry F. Schenk for petitioners. Duane E. Minará for respondent.
Dixon v. Illinois
No. 476, Misc. Dixon v. Illinois.
Kill v. Ragen
No. 450, Misc. Kill v. Ragen, Warden.
Bennett v. Stewart
No. 379, Misc. Bennett v. Stewart, Warden. Petitioner pro se. J. E. Taylor, Attorney General of Missouri, and Tyre W. Burton, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Romney v. United States
No. 753. Romney v. United States. William H. Collins for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
Anderson v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance
No. 798. Nos. 799 and 800. Anderson v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.; and Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. C. Granville Wyche and Alfred F. Burgess for petitioners. /. A. Chambliss and C. F. Hayns-
National Garment Co. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 785. National Garment Co. v. National Labor Relations Board. Charles H. Houston and Victor Packman for petitioner. Solicitor General Perlman, David P. Findling and Mozart G. Ratner for respondent.
Stein v. United States
No. 772. Stein et al. v. United States. Morris Lavine for petitioners. Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Quinn, Robert S. Erdahl and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Estate of Nathan v. Commissioner
No. 77. Estate of Nathan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Myron E. Wisch and Louis R. Kupfer for petitioner. George T. Washington, then Acting Solicitor General, Sewall Key, Helen R. Carloss and L. W. Post for respondent.
Didato v. Shaw
No. 243, No. 507, No. 509, No. 541, No. 544, No. 548, No. 566, Misc. Didato v. Shaw, Director; Tate v. Heinze, Warden; Baker v. Utecht, Warden; Ruthven v. Overholser, Superintendent; Gallaway v. Michigan; Stoker v. Ragen, Warden; and Petro
Hedgebeth v. North Carolina
HEDGEBETH v. NORTH CAROLINA. No. 674. Argued April 27,1948.' Decided June 14,1948. By special leave of Court, Wilford L. Whitley, Jr., pro hac vice, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Ralph Moody, Assistant Attorney General
Loftus v. Illinois
LOFTUS v. ILLINOIS. No. 59. Argued April 26, 1948. Decided June 14, 1948. Henry H. Fowler argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. William C. Wines, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him
Lichter v. United States
LICHTER et al., doing business as SOUTHERN FIREPROOFING CO., v. UNITED STATES. NO. 105. Argued November 20-21, 1947. Decided June 14, 1948. Paul W. Steer argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners in No. 105. Leo R. Friedman argued
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.