Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1954 Cases
312 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Curley v. Wisconsin
No. 288, No. 304, Misc. Misc. Curley v. Wisconsin, Allen v. Smyth, Superintendent of Virginia State Penitentiary,
Malek v. Michigan
No. 395, Misc. Malek v. Michigan.
Cole v. Heinze
No. 367, Misc. Cole v. Heinze, Warden.
Aycock v. North Carolina
No. 347, Misc. Aycock v. North Carolina.
Jones v. United States
No. 546. Jones et ux. v. United States. Roy St. Lewis and Carl L. Shipley for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Paul A. Sweeney and Lester S. Jayson for the United States.
United States v. Douglas
No. 567. United States v. Douglas. Acting Solicitor General Stern for the United States. Dale D. Drain for respondent.
Stoller v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 541. No. 542. Stoller, doing business as Richland Laundry & Dry Cleaners, v. National Labor Relations Board; and Laundry & Dry Cleaners Union, Local 197, v. National Labor Relations Board. Richard S. Munter for petitioner in No. 541. Ge
Washington National Insurance v. Sturm
No. 526. Washington National Insurance Co. v. Sturm, Administrator. Lon Hocker for petitioner.
Martin v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 511. Martin et al., doing business as Nemec Combustion Engineers, v. National Labor Relations Board. R. D. Sweeney and J. E. Simpson for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling and Dominick L. Mano
National Union of Marine Cooks & Stewards v. Arnold
No. 529. National Union of Marine Cooks and Stewards v. Arnold et al. Norman Leonard for petitioner. Samuel B. Bassett for respondents.
Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Ass'n v. National Labor Relations Board
March 8, 1954. No. 438. No. 479. Forest Lawn Memorial-Park Association, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board; and Pierce Brothers v. National Labor Relations Board. Dana Latham, Paul R. Watkins and Richard W. Lund for petitioners. Ugene U
Remmer v. United States
REMMER v. UNITED STATES. No. 304. Argued February 1-2, 1954. Decided March 8, 1954. J. Louis Monarch argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Spurgeon Avakian, John R. Golden and Leslie C. Gillen. Philip Elman argued the
International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 37 v. Boyd
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN’S AND WAREHOUSEMEN’S UNION, LOCAL 37, et al. v. BOYD, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 195. Argued January 6, 1954. Decided March 8, 1954. A. L. Wirin argued the cause for appellants.
Mazer v. Stein
MAZER et al., doing business as JUNE LAMP MANUFACTURING CO., v. STEIN et al., doing business as REGLOR OF CALIFORNIA. No. 228. Argued December 3, 1953. Decided March 8, 1954. Max R. Kraus and Robert L. Kahn argued the cause and filed a brie
United States v. Employing Lathers Ass'n
UNITED STATES v. EMPLOYING LATHERS ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO AND VICINITY et al. No. 439. Argued February 3, 1954. Decided March 8, 1954. Charles H. Weston argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor Gen
United States v. Employing Plasterers Ass'n
UNITED STATES v. EMPLOYING PLASTERERS ASSOCIATION OF CHICAGO et al. No. 440. Argued February 3, 1954. Decided March 8, 1954. Charles H. Weston argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern
Adams v. Maryland
ADAMS v. MARYLAND. No. 271. Argued January 7, 1954. Decided March 8, 1954. J. Francis Ford and George E. C. Hayes argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were James A. Cobb and Joseph H. A. Rogan. W. Giles Parker, Assistant
United States v. Binghamton Construction Co.
UNITED STATES v. BINGHAMTON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. No. 65. Argued December 1, 1953. Decided March 8, 1954. Assistant Attorney General Burger argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern,
Dukes v. Hanna
No. 268, Misc. Dukes v. Hanna, Warden. Jack Green-berg, Thurgood Marshall and Mendon P. Morrill for petitioner. Theodore D. Parsons, Attorney General of New Jersey, for respondent.
Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. v. Pfeifer
No. 507. Cincinnati Butchers' Supply Co. et al. v. Pfeifer et al. Sol Goodman for petitioners. James L. Magrish for respondents.
Epstein v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 210. Epstein et al., doing business as Top Mode Manufacturing Co., v. National Labor Relations Board. Samuel A. Schreckengaust, Jr. for petitioners. Acting Solicitor General Stern, George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli a
General Protective Committee v. Securities & Exchange Commission
No. 184. No. 154. General Protective Committee for the Holders of Option Warrants of the United Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al., Downing et al. v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al.,
White v. Howard
No. 501. White et al. v. Howard et al. Lester E. Wills for appellants. Perry W. Howard, Sr. for appellees.
General Electric Co. v. Washington
No. 335. General Electric Co. et al. v. Washington. Argued February 2, 1954. Decided February 8, 1954. Max Isenbergh argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Stern, Assistant Attorney General Holl
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.