Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1954 Cases
312 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Allen v. Grand Central Aircraft Co.
ALLEN, CHAIRMAN, TWELFTH REGION WAGE STABILIZATION BOARD, et al. v. GRAND CENTRAL AIRCRAFT CO. No. 450. Argued March 11-12, 1954. Decided May 24, 1954. Robert L. Stern argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief were Solicitor Ge
Galvan v. Press
GALVAN v. PRESS, OFFICER IN CHARGE, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE. No. 407. Argued January 11-12, 1954. Decided May 24, 1954. Harry Wolpin and A. L. Wirin argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Morris L. Ernst
Thomas v. California
No. 397, No. 398, No. 447, No. 483, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Thomas v. California et al., Smith v. Overlade, Warden, Vanderwyde v. Denno, Warden, Reed v. Kentucky,
Allen v. United States
No. 546, Misc. Allen v. United States.
Dusseldorf v. Teets
No. 462, Misc. Dusseldorf v. Teets, Warden. Victor E. Cappa for petitioner.
Aerovox Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 670. Aerovox Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board. Harold D. Cohen and Michael Waris, Jr. for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff and George J. Bott for respondent.
National Manufacturing Co. v. United States
No. 660. National Manufacturing Co. et al. v. United States. Clay C. Rogers and Byron Spencer for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Paul A. Sweeney and Morton Hollander for the United States.
Valentine v. Lamont
No. 637. Valentine v. Lamont et al. Louis G. Morten for petitioner. Theodore Rabinowitz for Lester Lamont et ux.; Robert H. Doherty for the Board of Education of Jersey City, New Jersey; and Edmund S. Johnson for Anthony J. Lamont, responde
Alton v. Alton
No. 531. Alton v. Alton.
United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States
UNITED SHOE MACHINERY CORP. v. UNITED STATES. No. 394. Argued April 26-27, 1954. Decided May 17, 1954. John L. Hall, Robert Proctor and Claude R. Branch argued the cause for appellant. With them on the brief were Walter Powers, John B. Reig
United States v. Borden Co.
UNITED STATES v. BORDEN COMPANY et al. No. 464. Argued April 27, 1954. Decided May 17, 1954. Assistant Attorney General Barnes argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, John F. Davis and
United States v. Gilman
UNITED STATES v. GILMAN. No. 449. Argued March 10-11, 1954. Decided May 17, 1954. Paul A. Sweeney argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Robert L. Stern, then Acting Solicitor General, and Assistant Attorney Gene
Capital Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
CAPITAL SERVICE, INC. et al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. No. 398. Argued April 6, 1954. Decided May 17, 1954. Carl M. Gould argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. Philip Elman argued the cause for respondent. With him on
Bolling v. Sharpe
BOLLING et al. v. SHARPE et al. No. 8. Argued December 10-11, 1952. Reargued December 8-9, 1953. Decided May 17, 1954. George E. C. Hayes and James M. Nabrit, Jr. argued the cause for petitioners on the original argument and on the reargume
Brown v. Board of Education
BROWN et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOPEKA et al. NO. 1. Argued December 9, 1952. Reargued December 8, 1953. Decided May 17, 1954. Robert L. Carter argued the cause for appellants in No. 1 on the original argument and on the reargument. T
Sell v. Pennsylvania
No. 515, Misc. Sell v. Pennsylvania et al.
Bird v. Murphy
No. 496, Misc. Bird v. Murphy, Warden.
Lipscomb v. United States
No. 442, Misc. Lipscomb v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Clokey v. Looney
No. 338, Misc. Clokey v. Looney, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Carl H. Imlay for respondent.
Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. v. Kendall
No. 631. Northwest Steel Rolling Mills, Inc. et al. v. Kendall, Assistant Administrator, Economic Stabilization Agency. De Witt Williams for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Burger, Samuel D. Slade and Mor
Crandall v. Cranor
No. 507, Misc. Crandall v. Cranor, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.
Hernandez v. Texas
HERNANDEZ v. TEXAS. No. 406. Argued January 11, 1954. Decided May 3, 1954. Carlos C. Cadena and Gus C. Garcia argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Maury Maverick, Sr. and John J. Herrera. Horace Wimberly, Assistant A
Dayton v. Bennett
No. 506, Misc. Dayton v. Bennett.
Pult v. United States
No. 477, Misc. Pult v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Edward S. Szukelewicz for the United States.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.