Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1956 Cases
423 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Tishler v. Englander Co.
May 18, 1956. No. 818. Tishler et al. v. Englander Co., Inc. Victor Rabinowitz for petitioners. James P. Durante for respondent.
Blakeney v. Mississippi
No. 609, Misc. Blakeney v. Mississippi. William W. Pierce for petitioner.
Roosa v. New York
No. 632, Misc. Roosa, alias Jones, v. New York.
Whitsell v. Alexander
No. 811. Whitsell v. Alexander et al. John J. Yowell for petitioner. Albert E. Jenner, Jr. for Alexander et al., and John T. Chadwell and Richard M. Keck for the American Optical Co., respondents.
Shafer v. United States
No. 797. Shafer et al. v. United States. Wilson K. Barnes for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Barnes, Daniel M. Friedman, Robert L. Farring-ton, Neil Brooks and Donald A. Campbell for the United States.
Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board
No. 48. Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board, John J. Abt and Joseph Forer for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff for respondent.
Cahill v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
CAHILL v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD CO. No. 436. Decided May 14, 1956. William T. Griffin and Herbert Bur stein for movant. Randolph J. Seifert in opposition.
MacKay v. Boyd
No. 248. MacKay v. Boyd, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service, et al.,
Brogan v. Martin
No. 664, Misc. Brogan v. Martin, Warden.
Brophy v. United States
No. 763. Brophy v. United States. Allan K. Perry for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Rankin and William H. Veeder for the United States.
Dulien Steel Products, Inc. v. Connell
No. 805. Dulien Steel Products, Inc. v. Connell. Irwin Geiger, Paul R. Harmel and Michael A. Schuchat for petitioner. Philip H. Mecom for respondent.
Corrado v. United States
No. 784. Corrado v. United States. Jack Wasserman for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Felicia Dubrovsky for the United States.
Liakas v. Nebraska
No. 768. Liakas v. Nebraska. Eugene D. O’Sullivan for petitioner.
San Diego Building Trades Council v. Garmon
No. 785. San Diego Building Trades Council et al. v. Garmon et al. Charles P. Scully, Mathew Tobriner and John C. Stevenson for petitioners. J. Sterling Hutcheson for respondents.
Board of the Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League Club
No. 732. Board of the Black River Regulating District v. Adirondack League Club. Arthur E. Sutherland for appellant. Charles H. Tuttle for appellee. Paul E. Brown filed a brief for the City of Watertown, New York, as amicus curiae, supporti
Hatahley v. United States
HATAHLEY et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 231. Argued March 26-27, 1956. Decided May 7, 1956. Norman M. Littell argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Marvin J. Sonosky and Frederick Bernays Wiener. Roger P. Marquis argued
General Box Co. v. United States
GENERAL BOX CO. v. UNITED STATES. No. 383. Argued March 28, 1956. Decided May 7, 1956. Edward Donald Moseley and Ross R. Barnett argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief with Mr. Moseley was Fred G. Benton. P. Z. Jones and Carl A. Chad
National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. TRUITT MANUFACTURING CO. No. 486. Argued March 29, 1956. Decided May 7, 1956. David P. Findling argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Theophil C. Kafnmholz,
Covey v. Town of Somers
COVEY, COMMITTEE, v. TOWN OF SOMERS. No. 380. Argued March 29, 1956. Decided May 7, 1956. Samuel M. Sprafkin argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Adolph I. King and Mandel Matthew Einhorn. Otto E. Koegel argued the cau
Mallonee v. Federal Home Loan Bank
No. 611. No. 69, No. 329, No. 557, Misc. Misc. Misc. Mallonee et al., Shareholders' Protective Committee, et al., v. Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco et al., Norman v. New York, Lawrence v. California, Collins v. Heinze, Warden,
Beaumont Broadcasting Corp. v. Enterprise Co.
No. 770. Beaumont Broadcasting Corp. v. Enterprise Company et al. George S. Smith, Edwin S. Nail, Paul M. Segal and Philip J. Hennessey, Jr. for petitioner. Leonard H. Marks and Paul Dobin for the Enterprise Company, respondent.
Wagner v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 776. Wagner, doing business as Wagner Transportation Co., v. National Labor Relations Board. Willis C. Moffatt for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Nancy M. Sherman
Armstrong v. United States
No. 754. Armstrong v. United States. Charles M. Trammell for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Rice and Joseph M. Howard for the United States.
Sterling v. Local 438
No. 345. Sterling v. Local 438, Liberty Association of Steam & Power Pipe Fitters & Helpers Association, et al. Louis R. Milio for petitioner.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.