Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1956 Cases
423 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Griffin v. Illinois
GRIFFIN et al. v. ILLINOIS. No. 95. Argued December 7, 1955. Decided April 23, 1956. Charles A. Horsky, acting under appointment by the Court, 349 U. S. 949, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. William C. Wines, Assistant At
Squire v. Capoeman
SQUIRE, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. CAPOEMAN et ux. No. 134. Argued January 19, 1956. Decided April 23, 1956. Charles F. Barber argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney
United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America v. Goodman Manufacturing Co.
April 18, 1956. No. 775. United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America (UE) et al. v. Goodman Manufacturing Co. et al. David Scribner and Basil R. Pollitt for petitioners. Solicitor General Sobeloff for the National Labor Relation
Mas v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.
No. 547, Misc. Mas et al. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co. Petitioners pro se. Ward J. Herbert for respondent.
Bramblett v. United States
No. 703. Bramblett v. United States. Edward Bennett Williams and Murdaugh Stuart Madden for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Deskin v. Pazan
No. 715. Deskin v. Pazan, doing business as Pazan Motor Freight, et al. David Previant and Abraham L. Zwerdling for petitioner.
Dunn v. United States
No. 577, No. 598, No. 638, Misc. Misc. Misc. Dunn v. United States; Gordon v. United States; and Wulsch v. Illinois et al.
Rothwell v. Linzell
No. 675. Rothwell et al. v. Linzell, Director of Highways. John Caren, William S. Evatt and Robert L. Barton for appellants. C. William O’Neill, Attorney-General of Ohio, and Hugh E. Kirkwood, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
United States v. White Bear Brewing Co.
April 9, 1956. No. 699. United States v. White Bear Brewing Co., Inc. et al. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Acting Assistant Attorney General Rice and Harry Baum for the United States. Kenneth F. Burgess, Edward P. Saltiel and William H. Avery
Armstrong v. Armstrong
ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG et al. No. 38. Argued November 15, 1955. Decided April 9, 1956. Robert N. Gorman argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were James N. Hengelbrok and Julius R. Samuels. Walter K. Sibbald argued the caus
Slochower v. Board of Higher Education
SLOCHOWER v. BOARD OF HIGHER EDUCATION OF NEW YORK CITY. No. 23. Argued October 18-19, 1955. Decided April 9, 1956. Ephraim London argued the cause and filed a brief for appellant. Daniel T. Scannell argued the cause for appellee. With him
International Harvester Credit Corp. v. Goodrich
INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER CREDIT CORP. et al. v. GOODRICH et al., CONSTITUTING THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF NEW YORK. No. 82. Argued January 17-18, 1956. Decided April 9, 1956. John Lord O’Brian argued the cause for appellants. With him on the
Archawski v. Hanioti
ARCHAWSKI et al. v. HANIOTI. No. 351. Argued March 5, 1956. Decided April 9, 1956. Harry D. Graham argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. Israel Convisser argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Collins v. American Buslines, Inc.
COLLINS et al. v. AMERICAN BUSLINES, INC. et al. No. 523. Argued March 29, 1956. Decided April 9, 1956. John P. Frank argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioners. John F. Franks argued the cause and filed a brief for the Industrial C
Schulz v. Pennsylvania Railroad
SCHULZ, ADMINISTRATRIX, v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD CO. No. 282. Argued March 27-28, 1956. Decided April 9, 1956. Nathan Baker argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner. Joseph P. Allen argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent
Ortega v. Ragen
No. 544, Misc. Ortega v. Ragen, Warden.
Kramer v. Alvis
No. 392, Misc. Kramer v. Alvis, Warden. Petitioner pro se. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, and Roger B. Turrell, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Efco Manufacturing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 717. Efco Manufacturing, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board. Benjamin H. Dorsey for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Dominick L. Manoli and Nancy M. Sherman for respondent.
Sale v. United States
No. 696. Sale v. United States. Harry Gershenson for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Acting Assistant Attorney General Rice and Harry Baum for the United States.
Nilva v. United States
No. 702. Nilva v. United States. Eugene Gressman and John W. Graff for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Robert G. Maysack for the United States.
Rogers v. Thompson
No. 625. Rogers v. Thompson, Trustee.
In re Burwell
IN RE APPLICATION OF BURWELL. NO. 736. Decided April 2, 1956.
Pennsylvania v. Nelson
PENNSYLVANIA v. NELSON. No. 10. Argued November 15-16, 1955. Decided April 2, 1956. Frank F. Truscott, Special Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and Harry F. Stambaugh argued the cause for petitioner. With them on the brief were Fran
Maloy v. City of Mulberry
No. 505. No. 379, Misc. Maloy v. City of Mulberry, Lipscomb v. United States,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.