Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1956 Cases
423 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Watwood v. District of Columbia
No. 263. Watwood v. District of Columbia. Carl L. Shipley for petitioner. Vernon E. West, Chester H. Gray and Hubert B. Pair for respondent.
Sexton v. Barry
No. 242. Sexton v. Barry et al. Petitioner pro se. Thomas O. Nevi-son for Barry, respondent.
Grunewald v. United States
No. 183. No. 184. No. 186. Grunewald v. United States; Halperin v. United States; and Bolich v. United States.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad
No. 313. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad Co. et al. William C. Wines for petitioners. Kenneth F. Burgess and Walter J. Cummings, Jr. for respondents.
National Labor Relations Board v. Textile Workers Union
No. 35. National Labor Relations Board v. Textile Workers Union of America, CIO, et al. Solicitor General Rankin, Theophil C. Kammholz and Dominick L. Manoli for petitioner. Arthur J. Goldberg, David E. Feller and Benjamin Wyle for the Text
A A A Dental Laboratories, Inc. v. Illinois ex rel. Chicago Dental Society
No. 311. A A A Dental Laboratories, Inc., et al. v. Illinois ex rel. Chicago Dental Society et al. Werner W. Schroeder for appellants. Owen Rail for appellees.
Mesarosh v. United States
October 10, 1956. No. 20. Mesarosh, alias Nelson, et al. v. United States. Argued and decided October 10, 1956. Solicitor General Rankin argued in support of the Government’s motion to remand. Assistant Attorney General Tompkins was with hi
Mesarosh v. United States
MESAROSH, alias NELSON, et al. v. UNITED STATES. No. 20. Argued and decided October 10, 1956. Opinions delivered November 5, 1956. Solicitor General Rankin argued in support of the Government’s motion to remand. Assistant Attorney General T
In re Flasphaler
No. 594, No. 621, No. 696, No. 703, No. 716, No. 726, No. 733, No. 773, No. 783, No. 787, No. 791, Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., Misc., October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. Octo
Johnston v. United States
No. 643, No. 704, No. 722, No. 773, No. 809, No. 820, No. 851, No. 854, No. 860, No. 901, No. 928, October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. October Term, 1955. O
Moyle v. Teets
No. 165, Misc. Moyle v. Teets, Warden.
Jackson v. Texas
No. 26, Misc. Jackson v. Texas.
Mullen v. Schneckloth
No. 175, Misc. Mullen v. Schneckloth, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.
Kenney v. Hatfield
No. 140, Misc. Kenney v. Hatfield et al. Petitioner pro se. Charles W. Core for respondents.
Stapleton v. Teets
No. 114, Misc. Stapleton v. Teets, Warden, et al.
Rhyce v. Cummings
No. 90, Misc. Rhyce v. Cummings, Warden.
Strong v. Blake
No. 73, Misc. Strong v. Blake et al. Petitioner pro se. Oscar H. Davis, then Acting Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Samuel D. Slade for respondents.
Bayless v. Missouri
No. 55, Misc. Bayless v. Missouri et al.
Sprouse v. Missouri
No. 43, Misc. Sprouse v. Missouri.
Gregory v. United States
No. 27, Misc. Gregory v. United States. Petitioner pro se. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Fuhs v. Randolph
No. 2, Misc. Fuhs v. Randolph, Warden. Petitioner pro se. Latham Castle, Attorney General of Illinois, for respondent.
United States v. California Eastern Line, Inc.
No. 104. United States et al. v. California Eastern Line, Inc. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Doub and Melvin Richter for petitioners. Robert E. Kline, Jr. and Louis J. Gusmano for respondent.
Carpentero v. Hogan
No. 217. Carpentero, alias Llanos, v. Hogan, Officer in Charge, Immigration and Naturalization Service. Hyman M. Greenstein for petitioner. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Olney and Beatrice Rosenberg f
Mondakota Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
No. 157. Mondakota Gas Co. et al. v. Federal Power Commission et al. James R. Browning and Ellis Lyons for petitioners. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Melvin Richter, Willard W. Gatchell and Jose
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.