Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1956 Cases
423 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Home Utilities Co. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
No. 266. Home Utilities Co., Inc., v. Eastman Kodak Co. Melvin J. Sykes for petitioner. David R. Owen for respondent.
Curcio v. United States
No. 260. Curcio v. United States. Samuel Mezansky for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Isabelle Cappello for the United States.
Mitchell v. Bekins Van & Storage Co.
No. 122. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, v. Bekins Van & Storage Co. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Solicitor General Rankin, Stuart Rothman and Bessie Margolin for petitioner. Homer D. Crotty and Luden Shaw for respondent.
Radovich v. National Football League
No. 94. Radovich v. National Football League et al. Maxwell Keith for petitioner. Marshall E. Leahy and John F. O’Dea for the National Football League et al., respondents. Simon E. Sobeloff, then Solicitor General, Assistant Attorney Genera
Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc.
No. 125. No. 224. Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.; and United States et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al. J. T. Suggs for the Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et
American Trucking Associations v. United States
No. 101. No. 110. American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al. v. United States et al.; and Railway Labor Executives' Association et al. v. United States et al. Peter T. Beardsley for the American Trucking Associations, Inc., Roland Rice an
Lang v. Halbert
No. 57, No. 103, No. 120, No. 124, No. 146, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Lang v. Halbert, U. S. District Judge; Dobbs v. Krause, Recorder's Court Judge, et al.; In re Fletcher; In re Wallace; and Janowicz v. Fox, Circuit Court Judge.
Spriggs v. United States
No. 46, No. 56, No. 66, No. 88, No. 106, No. 137, No. 138, No. 142, No. 156, No. 166, No. 178, No. 181, No. 187, Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Misc. Spriggs v. United States; In re Howard; Farnum v.
Ginsburg v. Gregg
No. 929, October Term, 1955. Ginsburg v. Gregg, Guardian Ad Litem, et al.,
Alberts v. California
No. 61. Alberts v. California.
Lightfoot v. United States
No. 32. Lightfoot v. United States.
Mesarosh v. United States
No. 20. Mesarosh, alias Nelson, et al. v. United States. Solicitor General Rankin and Assistant Attorney General Tompkins for the United States. Frank J. Donner, Arthur Kinoy, Marshall Perlin and Hubert T. Delany, for petitioners, filed a m
Hatchett v. Michigan
No. 92, Misc. Hatchett v. Michigan.
Garlington v. Wasson
No. 115. Garlington et al. v. Wasson et al. Elmer McClain for appellants.
Goodwin v. State Tax Commission
No. 170. Goodwin v. State Tax Commission. Charles Goodwin, Jr., pro se. Jacob K. Javits, Attorney General of New York, James 0. Moore, Jr., Solicitor General, and Robert W. Bush and John R. Davison, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee
Edwards v. New York
October 5, 1956. No. 23, Misc. Edwards v. New York. Curtis F. McClane was on the motion to dismiss. With him on the petition was John F. Finerty.
Leslie v. Houston Natural Gas Corp.
October 4, 1956. No. 146. Leslie et al. v. Houston Natural Gas Corp. Fred W. Moore was on the stipulation for petitioners. With him on the petition was Dan Moody. Leon Jaworski was on the stipulation for respondent. With him on a brief in o
Anchor Rome Mills, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
No. 229. Anchor Rome Mills, Inc., v. National Labor Relations Board. September 26, 1956. Frank A. Constangy, Thomas E. Shroyer and Milton G. Denbo were on the stipulation for petitioner. With them on the petition was John W. Maddox. Solicit
Peck v. Broadview Savings & Loan Co.
No. 139. Peck, Tax Commissioner of Ohio, v. Broadview Savings & Loan Co. et al. June 29, 1956. C. William O’Neill, Attorney General of Ohio, was on the stipulation for petitioner. With him on the petition was William E. Herron, Assistant At
Preferred Insurance v. United States
No. 222. Preferred Insurance Co. et al. v. United States,
Gichner Iron Works, Inc. v. Hanna
No. 950. Gichner Iron Works, Inc., v. Hanna et vir. Richard W. Galiher and William E. Stewart, Jr. for petitioner. Paul R. Connolly for respondents.
French v. Texas
No. 739. French v. Texas. Charles E. Heidings-f elder, Jr. for petitioner. John Ben Shepperd, Attorney-General of Texas, and John A. Wild, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Sansone v. United States
No. 728, Misc. Sansone v. United States. David du Vivier for petitioner. Solicitor General Sobeloff, Assistant Attorney General Olney, Beatrice Rosenberg and Julia P. Cooper for the United States.
Williams v. Michigan
No. 515, Misc. Williams v. Michigan. Petitioner pro se. Thomas M. Kavanagh, Attorney General of Michigan, Edmund E. Shepherd, Solicitor General, and Daniel J. O’Hara, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.